• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何培训患者及非正式照护者以有效促进医疗服务质量提升:关于荷兰“患者即个体学院”发展的行动研究

How patients and informal caregivers can be trained to effectively contribute to improved quality of healthcare services: action research on the development of the Dutch Patient As a Person Academy.

作者信息

Romme Sjim, Hermans Max, Bosveld Matthijs Hugo, Plak Angela, Sehlbach Carolin, van Bokhoven Marloes Amantia

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine at Maastricht University, Universiteit Maastricht Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands

Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e079712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079712.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079712
PMID:39806711
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667340/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patient and public involvement is regarded as vital in fostering high-quality care. While involvement has clear societal advantages, it is still widely viewed as tokenistic and surrounded by issues of representation. This study aims to understand how patients and informal caregivers can be trained to effectively contribute to improved quality of healthcare services.

DESIGN

Using an action research approach, a 15-week training programme for patients and informal caregivers called the Patient As a Person Academy was developed, tested and evaluated in three development cycles. Evaluation methods varied per development cycle and included open-ended questionnaires (N=27) and semistructured interviews (N=35) as well as agile evaluation sessions of all 15 training sessions.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We purposively sampled patients and informal caregivers who had prior experience in patient and public involvement. Patients and informal caregivers who participated as patient and partner educators in health professions education in the Netherlands could participate.

INTERVENTION

Participants followed the Patient As a Person Academy, a 15-week training programme that aims to prepare patients and informal caregivers to become patient partners.

RESULTS

Participants reported that the Patient As a Person Academy's focus on self-management skills, understanding healthcare professionals' perspectives and communication skills helped them to engage in meaningful dialogue with healthcare professionals as patient partners and made them more confident in their roles. However, tailoring towards individual participants' levels of acceptance of illness and reflexivity was needed. Participants reported that, next to the training programme, peer-to-peer coaching and guidance towards roles in quality improvement initiatives would be necessary to optimise their contributions.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiatives like the Patient As a Person Academy may alleviate the problems of tokenism in patient and public involvement. However, extensively preparing patients and informal caregivers raises issues around representation.

摘要

目标

患者和公众参与被视为促进高质量医疗护理的关键因素。尽管这种参与具有明显的社会优势,但仍被广泛视为形式主义,且存在代表性问题。本研究旨在了解如何培训患者和非正式照护者,使其能够有效地为改善医疗服务质量做出贡献。

设计

采用行动研究方法,为患者和非正式照护者开发了一个为期15周的培训项目,称为“患者即个体学院”,并在三个开发周期中进行了测试和评估。每个开发周期的评估方法各不相同,包括开放式问卷(N = 27)和半结构化访谈(N = 35),以及对所有15次培训课程的敏捷评估会议。

背景与参与者

我们有目的地抽取了有患者和公众参与经验的患者和非正式照护者。在荷兰参与卫生专业教育、担任患者和伙伴教育者的患者和非正式照护者可以参加。

干预措施

参与者参加了“患者即个体学院”,这是一个为期15周的培训项目,旨在使患者和非正式照护者做好成为患者伙伴的准备。

结果

参与者报告称,“患者即个体学院”对自我管理技能、理解医疗专业人员的观点以及沟通技能的关注,帮助他们作为患者伙伴与医疗专业人员进行有意义的对话,并使他们对自己的角色更有信心。然而,需要根据个体参与者对疾病的接受程度和反思能力进行调整。参与者报告称,除了培训项目之外,还需要同伴辅导以及在质量改进倡议中担任角色的指导,以优化他们的贡献。

结论

像“患者即个体学院”这样的举措可能会缓解患者和公众参与中的形式主义问题。然而,让患者和非正式照护者做好充分准备会引发代表性方面的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64cd/11667340/13e67fab2bd4/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64cd/11667340/13e67fab2bd4/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64cd/11667340/13e67fab2bd4/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How patients and informal caregivers can be trained to effectively contribute to improved quality of healthcare services: action research on the development of the Dutch Patient As a Person Academy.如何培训患者及非正式照护者以有效促进医疗服务质量提升:关于荷兰“患者即个体学院”发展的行动研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e079712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079712.
2
Patients and informal caregivers in the lead: a qualitative study on the experiences of patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals with involvement in treatment, e-health and self-management programs.患者和非正式照护者为主导:一项定性研究,探讨了患者、非正式照护者和医疗保健专业人员在参与治疗、电子健康和自我管理计划方面的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 10;24(1):713. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11156-z.
3
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
4
The different perspectives of patients, informal caregivers and professionals on patient involvement in primary care teams. A qualitative study.患者、非专业护理人员和专业人员对患者参与初级保健团队的不同看法。一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1171-1182. doi: 10.1111/hex.12824. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
Different views on collaboration between older persons, informal caregivers and care professionals.老年人、非正式照护者和护理专业人员之间合作的不同观点。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14091. doi: 10.1111/hex.14091.
6
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
7
End-of-life care research with bereaved informal caregivers--analysis of recruitment strategy and participation rate from a multi-centre validation study.对丧亲的非正式照料者进行的临终关怀研究——来自一项多中心验证性研究的招募策略与参与率分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 May 2;14:21. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0020-4.
8
Feasibility of an integrated multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation programme for older stroke patients: a process evaluation.老年脑卒中患者综合多学科康复方案的可行性:过程评估。
BMC Neurol. 2020 May 29;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01791-4.
9
A translational approach to design effective intervention tools for informal caregivers of dependent cancer patients.为依赖癌症患者的非正式照护者设计有效干预工具的转化方法。
Public Health. 2019 Mar;168:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.11.013. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Partners in Care: Training Healthcare Professionals in Using Patient Feedback.关爱伙伴:培训医疗保健专业人员如何利用患者反馈
Clin Teach. 2025 Aug;22(4):e70130. doi: 10.1111/tct.70130.

本文引用的文献

1
Seeing the patient as a person in interprofessional health professions education.在跨专业卫生职业教育中视患者为一个完整的人。
J Interprof Care. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):457-463. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2093843. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
2
Effectivity of near-peer teaching in training of basic surgical skills - a randomized controlled trial.近伴教学在基础外科技能培训中的有效性——一项随机对照试验
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02590-2.
3
Making public and patient involvement in clinical trials more than aspirational.
让公众和患者参与临床试验不仅仅是一种理想。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;10(3):188-189. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000786.
4
Patient and public involvement in covid-19 policy making.患者及公众参与新冠疫情政策制定。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2575.
5
Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor-patient communication.工作场所中的学习:医患沟通中非正式反馈线索的运用。
Med Educ. 2020 Sep;54(9):811-820. doi: 10.1111/medu.14148. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
6
"Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems": Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research.“一切完美,我们没有问题”:在定性研究中发现和限制社会期望偏差。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Apr;30(5):783-792. doi: 10.1177/1049732319889354. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Evaluating patient and public involvement in research.评估患者及公众参与研究的情况。
BMJ. 2018 Dec 6;363:k5147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5147.
8
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.患者和公众参与对临床试验入组和保留的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738.
9
Rethinking engagement.重新思考参与度。
BJPsych Bull. 2019 Feb;43(1):4-7. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2018.55. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.参与患者以提高医疗质量:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z.