• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与干预措施和建议对宫颈癌筛查未参与者进行随访-考虑到女性自身首选的检测方法-一项瑞典随机对照试验。

Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Division of Children's and Women's Health, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235202. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0235202
PMID:32614875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7332065/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is a highly preventable disease. To not attend an organized cervical cancer screening program increases the risk for cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer. The aim was to investigate the participation rate in three different intervention groups for non- attendees in the Swedish national program for cervical screening. The participation in the recommended follow up, and the histology found were also examined.

METHOD

Population-based randomized control trial. It included10,614 women that had not participated in the cervical cancer screening programme during the last six years (ages 30-49) and the last eight years (ages 50-64) were randomised 1:1:1(telephone call from a midwife (offering the choice between a visit for a pap smear or an HPV self-sampling test); an HPV self-sampling test only; or the routine procedure with a yearly invitation).

RESULTS

In the intention to treat analysis the participation rates were 25.5% (N = 803/3146) vs 34.1% (N = 1047/3068) and 7.0% (N = 250/3538) (p<0.001) for telephone, HPV self-test and control groups respectively. In the by protocol analysis including women that answered the phone call the participation rates were 31.7% (N = 565/1784) vs 26.1% (N = 788/3002) and 7.0% (N = 250/3538) (p<0.001) for telephone, HPV self-test and control groups. The corresponding results in the by protocol analysis including women that did not answer the phone call was 19.7% (N = 565/2870) vs 26.1% (N = 788/3002) and 7.0% (N = 250/3538) (p< 0.001). The majority of the women 63,4% (1131/1784) who answered the telephone wanted to participate either by booking a visit for pap smear (38,5%) or to be sent a HPV self- sampling test (24,9%) (p<0.001). Women who chose an HPV self-test were older and gave anxiety/ fear as a reason to decline participation, and they were also less likely to participate in the follow-up if found to be HPV-positive compared to the women who chose a Pap smear. The attendance to the recommended follow-up after abnormality was in total 87%. The non-attendees had a three or eight times higher risk of having a cytology result of HSIL or suspected SCC respectively, in the index sample compared to women screened as recommended (OR 3.3 CI 95% 1.9-5.2, OR 8.6 CI 1.6-30). A total of ten SCC and one adenocarcinoma were found in the histopathology results from the non-attendee group with a study intervention, while there was only one SCC in the non-attendee group without any study intervention (p = 0.02, OR 8.1 CI 95% 1.2-350).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests, according to intention to treat analysis, that the best intervention to get as many non-attendees as possible to participate is to send an HPV self-sampling test together with an invitation letter. Almost 90% of women in the study with an abnormal index sample attended follow-up. This is high enough to indicate that interventions to increase the participation among non-attendees are meaningful.

REGISTRY

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) Registration number ISRCTN78719765.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ca/7332065/c70c28c547d0/pone.0235202.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ca/7332065/c70c28c547d0/pone.0235202.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ca/7332065/c70c28c547d0/pone.0235202.g001.jpg
摘要

背景

宫颈癌是一种高度可预防的疾病。不参加有组织的宫颈癌筛查计划会增加宫颈发育不良和宫颈癌的风险。本研究旨在调查参加瑞典国家宫颈癌筛查计划的三组非参与者的参与率。还检查了他们在推荐的随访中的参与情况以及发现的组织病理学结果。

方法

这是一项基于人群的随机对照试验。共纳入 10614 名过去六年(年龄 30-49 岁)和过去八年(年龄 50-64 岁)未参加宫颈癌筛查计划的女性,将其随机分为 1:1:1 三组(接受助产士的电话访问(提供巴氏涂片检查或 HPV 自我采样检测的选择);仅接受 HPV 自我采样检测;或接受常规程序和每年邀请)。

结果

意向治疗分析结果显示,电话组、HPV 自我检测组和对照组的参与率分别为 25.5%(N = 803/3146)、34.1%(N = 1047/3068)和 7.0%(N = 250/3538)(p<0.001)。包括接听电话的女性在内的按方案分析结果显示,电话组、HPV 自我检测组和对照组的参与率分别为 31.7%(N = 565/1784)、26.1%(N = 788/3002)和 7.0%(N = 250/3538)(p<0.001)。包括未接听电话的女性在内的按方案分析结果显示,电话组、HPV 自我检测组和对照组的参与率分别为 19.7%(N = 565/2870)、26.1%(N = 788/3002)和 7.0%(N = 250/3538)(p<0.001)。大多数接听电话的女性(1784 名中的 63.4%,即 1131 名)希望通过预约巴氏涂片检查(38.5%)或接受 HPV 自我采样检测(24.9%)来参与(p<0.001)。选择 HPV 自我检测的女性年龄较大,并且因焦虑/恐惧而拒绝参与,与选择巴氏涂片的女性相比,如果 HPV 检测阳性,她们参与随访的可能性也较低。异常标本的建议随访总参与率为 87%。与按建议筛查的女性相比,非参与者在索引样本中分别有 3 倍和 8 倍更高的风险出现 HSIL 或疑似 SCC 的细胞学结果(OR 3.3,95%CI 1.9-5.2,OR 8.6,95%CI 1.6-30)。在非参与者组中,共发现 10 例 SCC 和 1 例腺癌,其中有研究干预,而在没有任何研究干预的非参与者组中,仅发现 1 例 SCC(p = 0.02,OR 8.1,95%CI 1.2-350)。

结论

根据意向治疗分析,我们的研究表明,让尽可能多的非参与者参与的最佳干预措施是同时发送 HPV 自我采样检测和邀请信。研究中近 90%的异常索引样本女性参加了随访。这足以表明增加非参与者参与度的干预措施是有意义的。

登记

国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)注册号 ISRCTN78719765。

相似文献

1
Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.参与干预措施和建议对宫颈癌筛查未参与者进行随访-考虑到女性自身首选的检测方法-一项瑞典随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235202. eCollection 2020.
2
Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial.增加宫颈癌筛查参与率:在 RACOMIP(一项瑞典随机对照试验)中,为长期未参与者提供 HPV 自我检测。
Int J Cancer. 2014 May 1;134(9):2223-30. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28545. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
3
A randomized, controlled trial of two strategies of offering the home-based HPV self-sampling test to non- participants in the Flemish cervical cancer screening program.一项关于向弗拉芒宫颈癌筛查计划中未参与者提供基于家庭的 HPV 自我采样检测的两种策略的随机对照试验。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):861-868. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31391. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
4
Increasing participation in cervical screening by targeting long-term nonattenders: Randomized health services study.通过针对长期未参与者来增加宫颈癌筛查的参与度:随机卫生服务研究。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;145(11):3033-3039. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32374. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: telephone contact with long-term non-attendees in Sweden. Results from RACOMIP, a randomized controlled trial.增加宫颈癌筛查参与度:瑞典对长期未就诊者进行电话联系。RACOMIP 随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Jul;133(1):164-71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27985. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
6
Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology.纳入阿尼什纳贝克宫颈癌筛查研究的社区随机对照试验:人乳头瘤病毒自我采样与巴氏细胞学检查对比
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 8;6(10):e011754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754.
7
Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program.CHOiCE试验方案:一项针对未参加有组织宫颈癌筛查项目者的基于家庭的HPV自我采样的三臂随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2859-z.
8
Reasons for non-attendance to cervical cancer screening and acceptability of HPV self-sampling among Bruneian women: A cross-sectional study.文莱女性宫颈癌筛查未到场的原因和 HPV 自我采样的可接受性:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0262213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262213. eCollection 2022.
9
Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial.利用 HPV 自我采样预防宫颈癌:与及时选择加入程序相比,直接邮寄检测试剂盒可更有效地提高筛查参与率——一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4165-4.
10
HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening - a randomised controlled trial.HPV 自我采样作为宫颈筛查不参与者的替代策略 - 一项随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;104(6):915-20. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.48. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of non-medical providers in increasing access to cervical screening: a scoping review.非医疗服务提供者在增加宫颈癌筛查可及性方面的作用:一项范围综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 31;10(8):e019041. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019041.
2
Self-Collection for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Safety-Net Setting: The PRESTIS Randomized Clinical Trial.安全网环境下宫颈癌筛查的自我采样:PRESTIS随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2971.
3
Self-collected vaginal HPV samples for long-term non-attendees in the Swedish organized cervical cancer screening program.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical cancer prevention among long-term screening non-attendees by vaginal self-collected samples for hr-HPV mRNA detection.通过阴道自我采集样本检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒(hr-HPV)mRNA对长期未参加筛查人群进行宫颈癌预防
Infect Agent Cancer. 2020 Feb 13;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s13027-020-00280-0. eCollection 2020.
2
Increasing participation in cervical screening by targeting long-term nonattenders: Randomized health services study.通过针对长期未参与者来增加宫颈癌筛查的参与度:随机卫生服务研究。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;145(11):3033-3039. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32374. Epub 2019 May 10.
3
A randomized, controlled trial of two strategies of offering the home-based HPV self-sampling test to non- participants in the Flemish cervical cancer screening program.
在瑞典有组织的宫颈癌筛查项目中,为长期未参与者自行采集阴道HPV样本。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1181-1189. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15112. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
4
Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling for Unscreened Women Aged 24 Years During the COVID-19 Pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间24岁未筛查女性的人乳头瘤病毒自我采样
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;12(21):2160. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212160.
5
The Acceptability and Feasibility of Self-Collected HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Black and Latinx Women in Chicago: Perspectives from the Community.芝加哥黑人和拉丁裔女性中自我采集HPV检测用于宫颈癌筛查的可接受性和可行性:来自社区的观点
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 30;5(1):735-743. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0102. eCollection 2024.
6
Randomized experimental population-based study to evaluate the acceptance and completion of and preferences for cervical cancer screening.随机实验性基于人群的研究,评估宫颈癌筛查的接受度、完成度和偏好。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 9;19(8):e0306130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306130. eCollection 2024.
7
Evaluating Opt-In Vaginal Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling: Participation Rates and Detection of High-Grade Lesions (CIN2+) among Unscreened Japanese Women Aged 30-39.评估自愿性阴道人乳头瘤病毒自我采样:30-39岁未筛查日本女性的参与率及高级别病变(CIN2+)的检测情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;12(5):599. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050599.
8
Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials.自我采样用于人乳头瘤病毒检测是否有可能增加宫颈癌筛查?观察性研究和随机临床试验的更新荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;10:1003461. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003461. eCollection 2022.
9
Offering HPV self-sampling kits: an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening.提供 HPV 自我采样试剂盒:增加宫颈癌筛查参与度策略有效性的更新荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Mar;128(5):805-813. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02094-w. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
10
Effect of Patient Characteristics on Uptake of Screening Using a Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kit: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.患者特征对邮寄人乳头瘤病毒自我采样试剂盒筛查参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2244343. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44343.
一项关于向弗拉芒宫颈癌筛查计划中未参与者提供基于家庭的 HPV 自我采样检测的两种策略的随机对照试验。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):861-868. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31391. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
4
Association of antiretroviral therapy with high-risk human papillomavirus, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive cervical cancer in women living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗逆转录病毒疗法与人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者的高危型人乳头瘤病毒、宫颈上皮内瘤变和浸润性宫颈癌的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet HIV. 2018 Jan;5(1):e45-e58. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30149-2. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing among Non-Attenders Increases Attendance to the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.非参检者中进行人乳头瘤病毒检测的自我采样可提高挪威宫颈癌筛查计划的参检率。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0151978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151978. eCollection 2016.
6
Age-specific prevalence of HPV16/18 genotypes in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈癌中HPV16/18基因型的年龄特异性患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cancer. 2016 Jun 15;138(12):2795-803. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29959. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Cervical cancer screening in Europe: Quality assurance and organisation of programmes.欧洲的宫颈癌筛查:项目的质量保证与组织
Eur J Cancer. 2015 May;51(8):950-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Vaginal self-sampling is a cost-effective way to increase participation in a cervical cancer screening programme: a randomised trial.阴道自我采样是一种提高宫颈癌筛查项目参与率的经济有效方式:一项随机试验。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Nov 25;111(11):2187-96. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.510. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
Attending cervical cancer screening, opportunities and obstacles: a qualitative study on midwives' experiences telephoning non-attendees in Sweden.参加宫颈癌筛查:机会与障碍——一项关于瑞典助产士给未参加者打电话的经历的定性研究
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Nov;42(7):691-7. doi: 10.1177/1403494814541594. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
10
Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial.增加宫颈癌筛查参与率:在 RACOMIP(一项瑞典随机对照试验)中,为长期未参与者提供 HPV 自我检测。
Int J Cancer. 2014 May 1;134(9):2223-30. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28545. Epub 2013 Oct 31.