• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较七氟醚和丙泊酚对术前有慢性疼痛的全膝关节置换术后疼痛发生率和生活质量的影响。

Comparison of Sevoflurane and Propofol on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty With Chronic Pain Before Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2021 Jan;21(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/papr.12931. Epub 2020 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/papr.12931
PMID:32615020
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol and sevoflurane as frequently used general anesthetics can affect postoperative pain. Our study explored whether the incidence of postoperative pain differed among patients with chronic pain undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) anesthetized with sevoflurane or propofol.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to groups receiving either sevoflurane (Group S, n = 50) or propofol (Group P, n = 47) for anesthesia maintenance during TKA. The incidences of postoperative pain and quality of life (QoL) were measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) scale at 1, 3, and 7 days post-operation (DPO), and 1 and 3 months post-operation (MPO).

RESULTS

At 3 DPO, fewer patients reported moderate pain (P = 0.001) and more patients reported no pain (P = 0.003) in Group S than that in Group P. At 3 MPO, more patients reported no pain (P = 0.04) and fewer patients reported moderate pain (P = 0.04) in Group S than in Group P. No significant differences were found in the incidence of postoperative pain between the 2 groups of patients at the other time points. The EQ-5D scores were higher in Group S than in Group P (P = 0.022), and the difference was 0.15 at most, which was not optimal. The EQ-5D clinical results might be not very significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevoflurane anesthesia may have potential advantages in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing TKA with a preoperative VAS score > 4.

摘要

背景

丙泊酚和七氟醚作为常用的全身麻醉药物,可影响术后疼痛。本研究旨在探讨术前视觉模拟评分(VAS)>4 的行全膝关节置换术(TKA)的慢性疼痛患者,接受七氟醚或丙泊酚麻醉时术后疼痛的发生率是否不同。

方法

患者随机分为七氟醚组(S 组,n=50)和丙泊酚组(P 组,n=47),两组均行 TKA 麻醉维持。采用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)在术后 1、3、7 天(DPO)和术后 1、3 个月(MPO)评估术后疼痛发生率和生活质量(QoL)。

结果

术后 3 DPO,S 组报告中度疼痛的患者比例低于 P 组(P=0.001),报告无痛的患者比例高于 P 组(P=0.003)。术后 3 MPO,S 组报告无痛的患者比例高于 P 组(P=0.04),报告中度疼痛的患者比例低于 P 组(P=0.04)。两组患者在其他时间点的术后疼痛发生率均无显著差异。S 组的 EQ-5D 评分高于 P 组(P=0.022),且差值最高为 0.15,差异无统计学意义。EQ-5D 临床结果可能不是很显著。

结论

对于术前 VAS 评分>4 的行 TKA 的慢性疼痛患者,七氟醚麻醉可能具有减轻术后疼痛的潜在优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Sevoflurane and Propofol on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty With Chronic Pain Before Surgery.比较七氟醚和丙泊酚对术前有慢性疼痛的全膝关节置换术后疼痛发生率和生活质量的影响。
Pain Pract. 2021 Jan;21(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/papr.12931. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
2
Postoperative analgesia in children after propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia.丙泊酚与七氟醚麻醉后儿童的术后镇痛。
Pain Med. 2013 Mar;14(3):442-6. doi: 10.1111/pme.12031. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
3
Suspected periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty under propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.全膝关节置换术后使用异丙酚与七氟醚麻醉后疑似人工关节周围感染:一项回顾性队列研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;65(8):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1139-6. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
4
The effects of anesthetics on chronic pain after breast cancer surgery.麻醉对乳腺癌手术后慢性疼痛的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Mar;116(3):685-93. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ee372. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
5
Presence of Night Pain, Neuropathic Pain, or Depressive Disorder Does Not Adversely Affect Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.夜间疼痛、神经性疼痛或抑郁障碍的存在并不影响全膝关节置换术后的结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Nov 7;37(43):e309. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e309.
6
Propofol and sevoflurane during epidural/general anesthesia: comparison of early recovery characteristics and pain relief.硬膜外/全身麻醉期间丙泊酚与七氟醚的比较:早期恢复特征及疼痛缓解情况
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Jun;17(5):819-32.
7
Open-label, prospective, randomized comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for laryngeal mask anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.丙泊酚与七氟醚用于小儿磁共振成像喉罩麻醉的开放标签、前瞻性、随机对照研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Jan;30(1):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.008.
8
The effect of sevoflurane compared to propofol maintenance on post-surgical quality of recovery in patients undergoing an ambulatory gynecological surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, clinical trial.七氟醚与丙泊酚维持麻醉对行门诊妇科手术患者术后恢复质量的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照、临床试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Dec;43:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
9
The Mark Coventry Award: Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Results in Better Range of Movement and Early Patient-reported Outcomes Than TKA.马克·考文垂奖:与全膝关节置换术相比,髌股关节置换术可带来更好的活动范围和早期患者报告结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000017.
10
The effect of desflurane versus propofol anesthesia on postoperative delirium in elderly obese patients undergoing total knee replacement: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial.七氟醚与丙泊酚麻醉对老年肥胖患者全膝关节置换术后谵妄的影响:一项随机、对照、双盲临床试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Jun;39:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of general anesthesia type on chronic postsurgical pain following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.全身麻醉类型对肺癌电视辅助胸腔镜手术后慢性术后疼痛的影响:一项回顾性倾向匹配队列研究
Korean J Pain. 2024 Oct 1;37(4):354-366. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24173.
2
Factors associated with persistent postsurgical pain after total knee or hip joint replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全膝关节或髋关节置换术后持续性手术疼痛的相关因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Pain Rep. 2023 Jan 10;8(1):e1052. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001052. eCollection 2023 Jan.