• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体间差异在大脑中诱导的电场暴露在 50 Hz 的均匀磁场。

Inter-individual variations in electric fields induced in the brain by exposure to uniform magnetic fields at 50 Hz.

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2020 Oct 22;65(21):215006. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aba21e.

DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/aba21e
PMID:32615544
Abstract

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standard establish safety limits for human exposure to electromagnetic fields. At low frequencies, only a limited number of computational body models or simplified geometrical shapes are used to relate the internal induced electric fields and the external magnetic fields. As a consequence, both standard/guidelines derive the exposure reference levels for the external magnetic field without considering the variability between individuals. Here we provide quantitative data on the variation of the maximum electric field strengths induced in the brain of 118 individuals when exposed to uniform magnetic fields at 50 Hz. We found that individual characteristics, such as age and skull volume, as well as incident magnetic field direction, have a systematic effect on the peak electric field values. Older individuals show higher induced electric field strengths, possibly due to age-related anatomical changes in brain. Peak electric field strengths are found to increase for larger skull volumes, as well as for incident magnetic fields directed along the lateral direction. Moreover, the maximum electric fields provided by the anatomical models used by ICNIRP for deriving exposure limits are considerably higher than those obtained here. On the contrary, the IEEE elliptical exposure model produces a weaker peak electric field strength. Our findings are useful for the revision and harmonization of the current exposure standard and guidelines. The present investigation reduces the dosimetric uncertainty of the induced electric field among different anatomical induction models. The obtained results can be used as a basis for the selection of appropriate reduction factors when deriving exposure reference levels for human protection to low-frequency electromagnetic exposure.

摘要

国际非电离辐射防护委员会 (ICNIRP) 指南和电气和电子工程师协会 (IEEE) 标准为人体暴露于电磁场制定了安全限值。在低频下,仅使用少数计算体模型或简化的几何形状来将内部感应电场与外部磁场联系起来。因此,标准/准则都没有考虑个体之间的差异,而是根据外部磁场推导了暴露参考水平。在这里,我们提供了 118 个人在 50Hz 均匀磁场下暴露时大脑中感应的最大电场强度变化的定量数据。我们发现,个体特征,如年龄和颅骨体积,以及入射磁场方向,对峰值电场值有系统影响。年龄较大的个体显示出更高的感应电场强度,这可能是由于大脑与年龄相关的解剖变化所致。对于较大的颅骨体积以及沿横向方向的入射磁场,峰值电场强度会增加。此外,ICNIRP 用于推导暴露限值的解剖模型提供的最大电场强度明显高于此处获得的值。相反,IEEE 椭圆暴露模型产生的峰值电场强度较弱。我们的研究结果有助于修订和协调当前的暴露标准和准则。本研究降低了不同解剖感应模型中感应电场的剂量不确定性。获得的结果可以用作在推导低频电磁暴露的人体保护暴露参考水平时选择适当的降低因子的基础。

相似文献

1
Inter-individual variations in electric fields induced in the brain by exposure to uniform magnetic fields at 50 Hz.个体间差异在大脑中诱导的电场暴露在 50 Hz 的均匀磁场。
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Oct 22;65(21):215006. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aba21e.
2
Children and adults exposed to low-frequency magnetic fields at the ICNIRP reference levels: theoretical assessment of the induced electric fields.儿童和成人在 ICNIRP 参考水平下暴露于低频磁场:感应电场的理论评估。
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Apr 7;57(7):1815-29. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/1815. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
3
Computational errors of the induced electric field in voxelized and tetrahedral anatomical head models exposed to spatially uniform and localized magnetic fields.体素化和四面体解剖头部模型在空间均匀和局部磁场中感应电场的计算误差。
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Jan 10;65(1):015001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5dfb.
4
Dosimetric Uncertainties: Magnetic Field Coupling to Peripheral Nerve.剂量学不确定性:磁场与周围神经的耦合
Health Phys. 2015 Dec;109(6):556-65. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000351.
5
Analysis of human brain exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields: a numerical assessment of spatially averaged electric fields and exposure limits.人类大脑暴露于低频磁场的分析:空间平均电场及暴露限值的数值评估。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2013 Jul;34(5):375-84. doi: 10.1002/bem.21780. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
6
Physiologic and dosimetric considerations for limiting electric fields induced in the body by movement in a static magnetic field.在静态磁场中运动时限制体内感应电场的生理和剂量学考虑因素。
Health Phys. 2011 Jun;100(6):641-53. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e318202ec7e.
7
Evaluation of Peripheral Electrostimulation Thresholds in Human Model for Uniform Magnetic Field Exposure.均匀磁场暴露人体模型外周电刺激阈值评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 30;19(1):390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010390.
8
Electric field induced in the human body by uniform 50 Hz electric or magnetic fields: bibliography analysis and method for conservatively deriving measurable limits.50赫兹均匀电场或磁场在人体中感应产生的电场:文献分析及保守推导可测量限值的方法
J Radiol Prot. 2016 Sep;36(3):419-436. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/3/419. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Aligning Exposure Limits for Contact Currents with Exposure Limits for Electric Fields.调整接触电流的暴露限值与电场暴露限值。
Health Phys. 2023 May 1;124(5):351-371. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001659. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
10
Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.用于表征低频电场和磁场暴露的不同基本剂量学量以及对实际暴露条件和指南的影响。
Health Phys. 2007 Jun;92(6):515-20. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000265310.91325.80.

引用本文的文献

1
Stimulus effects of extremely low-frequency electric field exposure on calcium oscillations in a human cortical spheroid.极低频电场暴露对人皮质类器官钙振荡的刺激作用。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2025 Jan;46(1):e22521. doi: 10.1002/bem.22521. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
2
Comparison of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Dosimetry between Structured and Unstructured Grids Using Different Solvers.使用不同求解器对结构化和非结构化网格之间的经颅磁刺激剂量测定法进行比较。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 13;11(7):712. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11070712.