Suppr超能文献

糖化间隙与连续血糖监测系统得出的糖化血红蛋白指数的一致性。

Consistency of the Glycation Gap with the Hemoglobin Glycation Index Derived from a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020 Jun;35(2):377-383. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.35.2.377. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discordances between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and glycemic control are common in clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the consistency of the glycation gap with the hemoglobin glycation index (HGI).

METHODS

From 2016 to 2019, 36 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled. HbA1c, glycated albumin (GA), and fasting blood glucose levels were simultaneously measured and 72-hour continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed on the same day. Repeated tests were performed at baseline and 1 month later, without changing patients' diabetes management. The HGI was calculated as the difference between the measured HbA1c and the predicted HbA1c that was derived from CGM. The glycation gap was calculated as the difference between the measured and GA-based predicted HbA1c levels.

RESULTS

Strong correlations were found between the mean blood glucose (MBG)-based HGI and the prebreakfast glucose-based HGI (r=0.867, P<0.001) and between the glycation gap and the MBG-based HGI (r=0.810, P<0.001). A close correlation was found between the MBG-based HGI at baseline and that after 1 month (r=0.729, P<0.001), with a y-intercept of 0 and a positive slope.

CONCLUSION

The HGI and glycation gap were highly reproducible, and the magnitudes of repeated determinations were closely correlated. Patients with similar mean glucose levels may have significantly different HbA1c levels.

摘要

背景

糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平与血糖控制之间的差异在临床实践中很常见。我们旨在研究糖化间隙与血红蛋白糖化指数(HGI)的一致性。

方法

2016 年至 2019 年期间,共纳入 36 例 2 型糖尿病患者。同日同时测定 HbA1c、糖化白蛋白(GA)和空腹血糖水平,并进行 72 小时连续血糖监测(CGM)。在基线和 1 个月后重复检测,不改变患者的糖尿病管理。HGI 计算为 CGM 得出的实测 HbA1c 与预测 HbA1c 之间的差值。糖化间隙计算为实测与基于 GA 的预测 HbA1c 水平之间的差值。

结果

MBG 为基础的 HGI 与早餐前血糖为基础的 HGI 之间存在较强的相关性(r=0.867,P<0.001),糖化间隙与 MBG 为基础的 HGI 之间也存在较强的相关性(r=0.810,P<0.001)。基线时的 MBG 为基础的 HGI 与 1 个月后的 HGI 高度相关(r=0.729,P<0.001),截距为 0,斜率为正。

结论

HGI 和糖化间隙具有高度可重复性,重复测定的幅度密切相关。平均血糖水平相似的患者可能具有显著不同的 HbA1c 水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5598/7386126/6bba38615c08/enm-2020-35-2-377f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验