• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单体位与双体位侧方椎间融合联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术后关节突关节侵犯:两种技术的比较。

Facet joint violation after single-position versus dual-position lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: A comparison of two techniques.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Aug;78:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.06.016
PMID:32616353
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of facet joint violation (FJV) after placement of percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) in 2 cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in a single position or dual position following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (extreme lateral interbody fusion [XLIF]).

METHODS

We reviewed 82 patients who underwent combined XLIF surgery and PPS fixation for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. Patient demographics were compared between 2 groups: those who remained in the lateral decubitus position for PPS fixation (SP group) and those who were turned to the prone position (DP group). Postoperative axial computed tomography scans were evaluated independently for FJV according to the following classification: grade 0, no impingement; grade 1, screw head in contact/suspected to be in contact with the facet joint; and grade 2, screw clearly invaded the facet joint.

RESULTS

A total of 349 screws were graded. Using the consensus grades, the incidence of FJV was 13.2% (46/349), but the incidence of FJV did not differ significantly according to the position of the patient during PPS insertion (SP group; 15.4%, DP group; 10.8%, P = 0.204).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of FJV after PPS insertion did not differ between the prone and lateral decubitus positions, grade 2 FJV was observed only in the SP group. To avoid FJV, the surgeon should pay close attention to the facet joints when inserting PPSs with the patient in a lateral decubitus position.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较后路腰椎间融合术(LLIF)后行单侧或双侧置钉经皮椎弓根螺钉(PPS)固定时,发生小关节突破坏(FJV)的发生率。

方法

我们回顾了 82 例接受联合极外侧腰椎间融合术(XLIF)和 PPS 固定治疗退行性腰椎疾病的患者。将患者分为两组:PPS 固定时保持侧卧位(SP 组)和改为俯卧位(DP 组)。术后行轴向 CT 扫描,根据以下分级独立评估 FJV:0 级,无撞击;1 级,螺钉头接触/疑似接触小关节;2 级,螺钉明确侵犯小关节。

结果

共对 349 枚螺钉进行了分级。采用共识分级,FJV 的发生率为 13.2%(46/349),但患者 PPS 置入时的体位与 FJV 的发生无明显相关性(SP 组:15.4%,DP 组:10.8%,P=0.204)。

结论

虽然俯卧位和侧卧位 PPS 置入后 FJV 的发生率无差异,但仅在 SP 组观察到 2 级 FJV。为避免 FJV,术者应在患者侧卧位时置入 PPS 时密切注意小关节。

相似文献

1
Facet joint violation after single-position versus dual-position lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: A comparison of two techniques.单体位与双体位侧方椎间融合联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术后关节突关节侵犯:两种技术的比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Aug;78:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Incidence and risk factors associated with superior-segmented facet joint violation during minimal invasive lumbar interbody fusion.微创腰椎椎间融合术中与上段关节突关节面侵犯相关的发生率及危险因素。
Spine J. 2022 Sep;22(9):1504-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
3
Risk Factors Related to Superior Facet Joint Violation During Lumbar Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF).微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)中经皮腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定时上关节突关节面破坏的相关危险因素。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e716-e723. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.118. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
4
Comparison of Superior-Level Facet Joint Violations Between Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement and Conventional Open Fluoroscopic-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement.机器人辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉置入与传统开放透视引导椎弓根螺钉置入在上位关节突关节面侵犯的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):850-856. doi: 10.1111/os.12534.
5
Rate and Risk Factors of Superior Facet Joint Violation during Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement: A Comparison of Robot-Assisted Approach with a Conventional Technique.皮质骨轨迹螺钉置入时上关节突关节面破坏的发生率和危险因素:机器人辅助入路与传统技术的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):133-140. doi: 10.1111/os.12598. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Cranial Facet Joint Violation Following Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique.使用皮质骨轨迹技术置入椎弓根螺钉后相邻颅面小关节侵犯的发生率及危险因素
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 15;41(14):E851-E856. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001459.
7
The analysis of percutaneous pedicle screw technique with guide wire-less in lateral decubitus position following extreme lateral interbody fusion.经皮椎弓根螺钉技术在侧卧位极外侧椎间融合术中无导丝分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Sep 5;14(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1354-z.
8
Facet angle and its importance on joint violation in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in lumbar vertebrae: A retrospective study.腰椎经皮椎弓根螺钉固定中关节突关节角及其对关节损伤的重要性:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(22):e10943. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010943.
9
Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation.应用术中三维 CT(O 臂)计算机导航对比开放与经皮椎弓根螺钉置钉时颅面关节突关节面破坏率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):E251-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ecbf1.
10
Accuracy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement after Single-Position versus Dual-Position Insertion for Lateral Interbody Fusion and Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Fluoroscopy.透视引导下经皮椎弓根螺钉置入用于外侧椎间融合及椎弓根螺钉固定时单位置与双位置插入后的准确性
Asian Spine J. 2022 Feb;16(1):20-27. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0526. Epub 2021 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Spinal Robotics in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Key Concepts and Technical Considerations.成人脊柱畸形手术中的脊柱机器人技术:关键概念与技术考量
Asian J Neurosurg. 2025 Mar 31;20(3):448-455. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1806858. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The biomechanical changes of facet joint violation after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion combined with decompression surgery: a finite element study.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术联合减压手术后小关节损伤的生物力学变化:一项有限元研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 1;13:1481719. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1481719. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.
腰椎侧方和斜向椎间融合术的比较性综述:技术、结果及并发症
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 May 12;19(2):246-260. doi: 10.14444/8759.
4
Impact of fixed-point rotational reduction of the spine on pain scores and lower limb motor function in patients with lumbar facet joint disorder.脊柱定点旋转复位对腰椎小关节紊乱症患者疼痛评分及下肢运动功能的影响
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 16;26(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08139-w.
5
Does Robotic Spine Surgery Add Value to Surgical Practice over Navigation-Based Systems? A Study on Operating Room Efficiency.与基于导航的系统相比,机器人脊柱手术是否能为外科手术带来更多价值?一项关于手术室效率的研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 23;60(12):2112. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122112.
6
Efficacy and safety of navigation robot-assisted versus conventional oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A retrospective study.导航机器人辅助与传统斜外侧腰椎体间融合内固定治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 9;103(32):e39261. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039261.
7
The Evolution of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Journey from Past to Present.腰椎侧路椎间融合术的演变:从过去到现在。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 23;60(3):378. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030378.
8
The Utility and Appropriateness of Single-Position Circumferential Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-Arm-Based Navigation in the Novel Oblique Position.在新型斜位使用基于O型臂导航的单位置环形腰椎椎间融合术的实用性和适宜性
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 15;12(22):7114. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227114.
9
Prone position lateral interbody fusion-a narrative review.俯卧位侧方椎间融合术——一篇叙述性综述
J Spine Surg. 2023 Sep 22;9(3):331-341. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-34. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
10
Comparison of Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation and Lateral Fixation in the Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients with Osteopenia or Osteoporosis.骨质疏松或骨量减少的腰椎退变性疾病患者行极外侧椎间融合术中后路椎弓根螺钉固定与侧方固定的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3283-3292. doi: 10.1111/os.13540. Epub 2022 Oct 23.