• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人管理局不稳定型心绞痛患者治疗合作研究。左心室功能异常患者的结果。

Veterans Administration Cooperative Study for treatment of patients with unstable angina. Results in patients with abnormal left ventricular function.

作者信息

Scott S M, Luchi R J, Deupree R H

机构信息

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Asheville, NC 28805.

出版信息

Circulation. 1988 Sep;78(3 Pt 2):I113-21.

PMID:3261647
Abstract

In a prospective randomized trial, 468 patients with unstable angina pectoris who were stratified according to clinical presentation (Type I or Type II angina) and left ventricular function (normal or abnormal) were assigned to medical or surgical treatment groups. Left ventricular function was defined as abnormal if the ejection fraction was less than 0.50, or if the end-diastolic pressure was 16 mm Hg or greater. Left ventricular function was abnormal in 134 patients, 66 of whom were assigned to surgical and 68 to medical treatment groups. The cumulative 3-year mortality for surgical patients was 6.1% and for medical patients, 17.6% (p = 0.039). This 3-year figure represents a 65% reduction in mortality with surgery. Survival was significantly better for surgical patients whose ejection fractions ranged from 0.30 to 0.49 (p = 0.05). Survival of patients whose ejection fractions were greater than 0.69 was better with medical treatment (p = 0.049). Thus, surgery appears to be the treatment of choice for patients with unstable angina pectoris and abnormal left ventricular function.

摘要

在一项前瞻性随机试验中,468例不稳定型心绞痛患者根据临床表现(I型或II型心绞痛)和左心室功能(正常或异常)进行分层,然后被分配到药物治疗组或手术治疗组。如果射血分数小于0.50,或舒张末期压力为16毫米汞柱或更高,则左心室功能被定义为异常。134例患者左心室功能异常,其中66例被分配到手术治疗组,68例被分配到药物治疗组。手术患者的3年累积死亡率为6.1%,药物治疗患者为17.6%(p = 0.039)。这个3年的数据表明手术可使死亡率降低65%。射血分数在0.30至0.49之间的手术患者生存率显著更高(p = 0.05)。射血分数大于0.69的患者药物治疗的生存率更好(p = 0.049)。因此,对于不稳定型心绞痛且左心室功能异常的患者,手术似乎是首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study for treatment of patients with unstable angina. Results in patients with abnormal left ventricular function.退伍军人管理局不稳定型心绞痛患者治疗合作研究。左心室功能异常患者的结果。
Circulation. 1988 Sep;78(3 Pt 2):I113-21.
2
Comparison of medical and surgical treatment for unstable angina pectoris. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.
N Engl J Med. 1987 Apr 16;316(16):977-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198704163161603.
3
Coronary bypass surgery improves survival in high-risk unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative study with an 8-year follow-up. Veterans Administration Unstable Angina Cooperative Study Group.冠状动脉搭桥手术可提高高危不稳定型心绞痛患者的生存率。一项退伍军人管理局合作研究的8年随访结果。退伍军人管理局不稳定型心绞痛合作研究组。
Circulation. 1991 Nov;84(5 Suppl):III260-7.
4
VA Study of Unstable Angina. 10-year results show duration of surgical advantage for patients with impaired ejection fraction.退伍军人事务部不稳定型心绞痛研究。10年结果显示,射血分数受损患者手术优势的持续时间。
Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5 Pt 2):II120-3.
5
Survival predictors in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 10-30% receiving a coronary bypass: analysis of preoperative variables.左心室射血分数为10%-30%的冠状动脉搭桥患者的生存预测因素:术前变量分析
Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Oct;1(5):558-62.
6
[Different clinical and prognostic aspects of angina pectoris in unstable phase].[不稳定型心绞痛的不同临床及预后方面]
G Ital Cardiol. 1985 Jul;15(7):661-5.
7
Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass grafting for patients with low left ventricular ejection fractions, unstable angina pectoris, and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass (the AWESOME Randomized Trial and Registry).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数低、不稳定型心绞痛及旁路手术不良结局危险因素患者的疗效比较(AWESOME随机试验及注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jul 1;94(1):118-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.041.
8
Medical compared with surgical management of unstable angina. 5-year mortality and morbidity in the Veterans Administration Study.不稳定型心绞痛的药物治疗与手术治疗比较。退伍军人管理局研究中的5年死亡率和发病率。
Circulation. 1989 Nov;80(5):1176-89. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.5.1176.
9
Determinants of risk for coronary artery bypass grafting in stable and unstable angina pectoris.稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的风险决定因素。
Can J Surg. 1985 Nov;28(6):505-8.
10
Percutaneous intervention versus coronary bypass surgery for patients older than 70 years of age with high-risk unstable angina.70岁以上高危不稳定型心绞痛患者的经皮介入治疗与冠状动脉搭桥手术对比
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Oct;80(4):1340-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.057.

引用本文的文献

1
Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?药物洗脱支架会取代冠状动脉搭桥手术吗?
Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(3):323-30.
2
Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation. British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Practice Committee and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit.非持续性心电图ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南。英国心脏病学会指南与医学实践委员会及皇家内科医师学院临床疗效与评估单位
Heart. 2001 Feb;85(2):133-42. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.2.133.
3
Review of quality-of-life evaluations in patients with angina pectoris.
心绞痛患者生活质量评估综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Aug;16(2):141-52. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916020-00003.