Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架会取代冠状动脉搭桥手术吗?

Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

作者信息

Reul Ross M

机构信息

The Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(3):323-30.

Abstract

Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the treatment of choice for certain types of coronary artery disease (CAD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)--particularly coronary angioplasty with stenting--has become the most popular nonmedical treatment approach to CAD. Some have speculated that, with the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs), PCI will replace CABG entirely. However, the complete disappearance of CABG is both unlikely and unwarranted, for several reasons. Published randomized trials of CABG, PCI, and medical approaches to CAD compared only highly selected subgroups of patients because of strict exclusion criteria that often favored the PCI cohorts. Therefore, their results do not constitute sufficient evidence for the superiority of PCI over CABG in all CAD patients requiring revascularization. As PCI indications broaden to include more complex lesions and more high-risk patients, outcomes will not remain as favorable. In addition, although PCI is less invasive than surgery, CABG offers more complete revascularization and better freedom from repeat revascularization. Furthermore, no long-term patency data on DESs yet exist, whereas excellent 10- and 20-year patency rates have been reported for the left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending artery graft used in most CABG procedures. While PCI has been changing, CABG has not been stagnant; recently, advances in many aspects of the CABG procedure have improved short- and long-term outcomes in CABG patients. Both CABG and PCI technologies will continue to advance, not necessarily exclusive of one another, but no data yet exist to suggest that DESs will render CABG obsolete any time soon.

摘要

尽管冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)仍是某些类型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的首选治疗方法,但经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)——尤其是冠状动脉支架植入术——已成为治疗CAD最流行的非药物治疗方法。一些人推测,随着药物洗脱支架(DES)的出现,PCI将完全取代CABG。然而,由于以下几个原因,CABG完全消失既不太可能,也没有必要。已发表的关于CABG、PCI及CAD药物治疗方法的随机试验仅比较了高度选择的患者亚组,因为严格的排除标准往往有利于PCI队列。因此,它们的结果并不足以证明PCI在所有需要血运重建的CAD患者中优于CABG。随着PCI适应证扩大到包括更复杂的病变和更多高危患者,其治疗效果将不会一直那么理想。此外,尽管PCI的侵入性比手术小,但CABG能提供更完全的血运重建,且再次血运重建的自由度更高。此外,目前尚无关于DES的长期通畅数据,而大多数CABG手术中使用的左乳内动脉至左前降支动脉搭桥术已报告了出色的10年和20年通畅率。在PCI不断发展的同时,CABG也并非停滞不前;最近,CABG手术多个方面的进展改善了CABG患者的短期和长期治疗效果。CABG和PCI技术都将继续发展,不一定相互排斥,但目前尚无数据表明DES会在短期内使CABG过时。

相似文献

4
Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients with diabetes: implications of the FREEDOM trial.
Clin Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.07.427.
6
Current clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Aug;86(2):496-503; discussion 503. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.060.
9
Diabetes and coronary revascularization.
JAMA. 2005 Mar 23;293(12):1501-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.12.1501.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Serial angiographic follow-up beyond 10 years after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Circ J. 2005 Aug;69(8):896-902. doi: 10.1253/circj.69.896.
3
Radial artery conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: current perspective.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jul;130(1):232-3; author reply 233. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.02.033.
4
Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation.
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 26;352(21):2174-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040316.
8
Robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass surgery.
Indian Heart J. 2004 Nov-Dec;56(6):622-7.
9
Is postoperative calcium channel blocker therapy needed in patients with radial artery grafts?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Mar;129(3):532-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.07.054.
10
Computational model of blood flow in the aorto-coronary bypass graft.
Biomed Eng Online. 2005 Mar 4;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-4-14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验