Suppr超能文献

在一项人群调查中,使用社区牙周指数(CPITN)、牙龈出血和牙石指数(GPM/T)以及龋失补指数(DMF/T)评估牙周疾病和龋齿。

Assessment of periodontal disease and dental caries in a population survey using the CPITN, GPM/T and DMF/T indices.

作者信息

Gaengler P, Goebel G, Kurbad A, Kosa W

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Stomatology, Medical Academy of Erfurt, German Democratic Republic.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1988 Aug;16(4):236-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb01762.x.

Abstract

2263 randomly selected subjects, aged 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and greater than 64 yr, were assessed for periodontal status, caries status and treatment needs using the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN), the ratio of Gingivitis: Periodontitis: Missing teeth (GPM/T index) and the DMF/T index. The advantages of full mouth examination were compared to partial recordings. The CPITN underestimated deep pocketing especially in older age groups and in younger groups overestimated the need for scaling. Although the mean GPM/T number of periodontally affected teeth is in the range of 9-13 teeth and stable throughout the age groups there were age-dependent high risk groups for developing shallow pocketing (20-24 yr) and deep pocketing (45-54 yr), whereas adolescents were at high caries risk. The increase in the number of missing teeth was dramatic after the age of 54 yr only one decade after the high risk age for deep pathologic pockets.

摘要

随机选取2263名年龄在15 - 19岁、20 - 24岁、25 - 29岁、30 - 34岁、35 - 44岁、45 - 54岁、55 - 64岁以及64岁以上的受试者,使用社区牙周治疗需求指数(CPITN)、牙龈炎:牙周炎:缺失牙比例(GPM/T指数)和DMF/T指数评估其牙周状况、龋病状况及治疗需求。比较了全口检查与部分记录的优势。CPITN低估了深牙周袋,尤其是在老年人群中,而在年轻人群中高估了洁治需求。尽管牙周受累牙齿的平均GPM/T数在9 - 13颗牙齿范围内且在各年龄组中稳定,但存在与年龄相关的浅牙周袋(20 - 24岁)和深牙周袋(45 - 54岁)高风险组,而青少年患龋风险较高。仅在深病理性牙周袋高风险年龄后的十年,即54岁之后,缺失牙数量急剧增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验