Walser Matthias, Hermann Matthias, Hufnagel Markus, Haas Nikolaus A, Fischer Marcus, Dalla-Pozza Robert, Jakob André
From the Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg. Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Oct;39(10):e310-e313. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002810.
Kawasaki disease (KD) patients' resistance to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) places them at high risk for an unfavorable progression of the disease. In these patients, there has been little evidence that alternative treatments are effective. Nevertheless, biologicals such as an interleukin-1-receptor blocker and tumor-necrosis-factor-α inhibitors increasingly have been used. If the patient does not respond to one of these therapeutics, a combination of 2 biologicals might be an alternative, but this is not yet generally accepted due to the potentially increased risk of infection. Here we report on a 3-month-old boy suffering from severe refractory KD. KD diagnosis was delayed due to the misinterpretation of a urinary tract infection and to the short and nonsimultaneous presence of classical KD symptoms. After complete KD later was able to be diagnosed, treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins was administered. However, the disease proved resistant to 2 courses of IVIG, as well as to corticosteroids. The patient developed giant coronary artery aneurysms early during the course of disease. Anakinra was initiated, but even with stepwise higher anakinra dosages, he remained febrile and coronary artery dimensions increased. Therefore, etanercept was added as a second biological. Only under combination treatment with anakinra and etanercept were his inflammation and fever able to be completely resolved. Coronary artery dimensions improved over time.
川崎病(KD)患者对静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)治疗产生抵抗,这使他们处于疾病进展不利的高风险中。在这些患者中,几乎没有证据表明替代疗法有效。尽管如此,白细胞介素-1受体阻滞剂和肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂等生物制剂的使用越来越多。如果患者对其中一种治疗方法无反应,两种生物制剂联合使用可能是一种选择,但由于感染风险可能增加,这尚未被普遍接受。在此,我们报告一名患有严重难治性KD的3个月大男孩。由于对尿路感染的错误解读以及经典KD症状出现时间短且不同时出现,KD诊断被延迟。在后来能够确诊为完全性KD后,给予了静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗。然而,该疾病对两疗程的IVIG以及皮质类固醇均耐药。患者在病程早期就出现了巨大冠状动脉瘤。开始使用阿那白滞素,但即使逐步增加阿那白滞素剂量,他仍持续发热,冠状动脉尺寸增大。因此,添加了依那西普作为第二种生物制剂。仅在阿那白滞素和依那西普联合治疗下,他的炎症和发热才得以完全消退。冠状动脉尺寸随时间有所改善。