Diagnostic Radiography, School of Health and Sports Science, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, United Kingdom.
Diagnostic Radiography, School of Dentistry and Health Sciences, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020 Sep;51(3):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
This article explores the application of personalized medicine (PM) within the academic environment in the United Kingdom. There is a growing acceptance of the utility of PM in health care and the role medical imaging can play. In response, this article explored the views and opinions of diagnostic and therapeutic academics and the utilization of PM in education.
This study primarily adopted a quantitative approach using an online survey. However, participants were also encouraged to provide qualitative comments in response to open-ended questions. The survey was distributed to radiography and radiotherapy academic departments, which received a response rate of 29%.
The findings identify some important considerations. On the one hand some participants reported teaching PM on their programmes (24%, n = 16), whereas 30% (n = 20) did not. Importantly, the remaining academics (46%) were either unsure or did not know what PM was. This finding, coincided with qualitative commentary, highlights some discrepancies linked to knowledge and understanding of PM within higher education and highlights areas where academics may need additional support.
This article concludes by recognizing the challenges of delivering PM by some academics. It is noted that although the findings cannot be fully generalized, it does highlight fragmented understanding of PM among academic staff. This is important to reflect upon following the increasing requirements for radiography to become "more personalized."
本文探讨了个性化医学(PM)在英国学术环境中的应用。人们越来越接受 PM 在医疗保健中的实用性,以及医学影像可以发挥的作用。有鉴于此,本文探讨了诊断和治疗学学者的观点和意见,以及 PM 在教育中的应用。
本研究主要采用定量方法,使用在线调查。然而,参与者也被鼓励对开放式问题提供定性评论。该调查分发给放射学和放射治疗学学术部门,回应率为 29%。
研究结果确定了一些重要的考虑因素。一方面,一些参与者报告说在他们的课程中教授 PM(24%,n=16),而 30%(n=20)的参与者没有。重要的是,其余的学者(46%)要么不确定,要么不知道 PM 是什么。这一发现与定性评论相吻合,突显了高等教育中与 PM 相关的知识和理解方面的一些差异,并强调了学者可能需要额外支持的领域。
本文最后认识到一些学者在提供 PM 方面面临的挑战。需要指出的是,尽管这些发现不能完全推广,但它们确实突出了学术人员对 PM 的理解存在零散。在对放射科提出“更加个性化”的要求之后,这一点值得反思。