• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光学频域成像评估超亲水性聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的早期血管反应:EVALUATION 研究。

Early vascular response of ultra-thin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical frequency domain imaging: the EVALUATION study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nagano Municipal Hospital, 1333-1, Tomitake, Nagano, 381-0006, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jul;36(3):281-288. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00689-9. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1007/s12928-020-00689-9
PMID:32621170
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the early vascular response of ultra-thin strut bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP SES) using optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI). Ultra-thin strut BP SES have superior outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety endpoints when compared to other thin strut new-generation stents. However, the factors contributing to the superiority of BP SES over other thin strut new-generation stents are unclear. A total of 32 patients with multivessel disease requiring staged procedures at 1 month were enrolled from 3 cardiovascular institutions; of these, 31 were immediately assessed by OFDI (n = 31). All patients were assessed at 1 month after ultra-thin strut BP SES implantation. The primary endpoint was % of uncovered struts. A total of 1723 cross sections (17,014 struts) were analyzed at baseline and 1 month after percutaneous coronary intervention. The % uncovered struts at 1-month follow-up was 7.7% (4.0, 13.8). Furthermore, the covered strut % (88.4% and 80.4%, P = 0.013) and malapposition rate (2.7% and 4.3%, P = 0.012) were significantly different between the 60-μm and 80-μm stents. Ultra-thin strut BP SES implantation may feasibly achieve early vascular responses due to the ultra-thin struts. This may ultimately lead to lower stent thrombosis and target lesion failure rates.Clinical trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (No. UMIN000033406).

摘要

本研究旨在使用光频域成像(OFDI)评估超亲生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(BP SES)的早期血管反应。与其他薄壁新一代支架相比,超薄壁 BP SES 在疗效和安全性终点方面具有优势。然而,导致 BP SES 优于其他薄壁新一代支架的因素尚不清楚。这项研究共纳入了 3 家心血管机构的 32 名多支血管病变患者,这些患者需要在 1 个月内进行分期手术;其中 31 名患者立即接受 OFDI 评估(n=31)。所有患者在植入超薄壁 BP SES 后 1 个月进行评估。主要终点是未覆盖支架的百分比。基线和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 1 个月后分析了总共 1723 个横截面(17014 个支架)。1 个月随访时未覆盖支架的百分比为 7.7%(4.0,13.8)。此外,在 60μm 和 80μm 支架之间,覆盖支架的百分比(88.4%和 80.4%,P=0.013)和贴壁不良率(2.7%和 4.3%,P=0.012)差异有统计学意义。超薄壁 BP SES 植入可能由于支架超薄而实现早期血管反应。这最终可能导致支架血栓形成和靶病变失败率降低。临床试验注册 大学医院医疗信息网临床试验注册(注册号 UMIN000033406)。

相似文献

1
Early vascular response of ultra-thin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical frequency domain imaging: the EVALUATION study.光学频域成像评估超亲水性聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的早期血管反应:EVALUATION 研究。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jul;36(3):281-288. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00689-9. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
2
Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与永久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架9个月随访时的血管反应:来自CENTURY II试验的光学相干断层扫描子研究
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;17(1):34-40. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev203. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Can an ultrathin strut stent design and a polymer free, proendothelializing probucol matrix coating improve early strut healing? The FRIENDLY-OCT trial. An intra-patient randomized study with OCT, evaluating early strut coverage of a novel probucol coated polymer-free and ultra-thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent compared to a biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent.超薄支架设计和无聚合物、促进内皮化的普罗布考基质涂层能否改善早期支架愈合?FRIENDLY-OCT 试验。一项采用 OCT 的患者内随机研究,评估新型无聚合物、超薄支架雷帕霉素洗脱支架与生物可降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架相比,早期支架覆盖率与普罗布考涂层的关系。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Aug 1;360:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.043. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:随机 BIOFLOW V 试验 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1343-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019.
5
Optical coherence tomography findings: insights from the "randomised multicentre trial investigating angiographic outcomes of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in chronic total occlusions" (PRISON IV) trial.光学相干断层扫描结果:“随机多中心试验研究在慢性完全闭塞病变中使用生物可降解聚合物的杂交西罗莫司洗脱支架与使用永久性聚合物的依维莫司洗脱支架的血管造影结果”(PRISON IV 试验)的见解。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Aug 4;13(5):e522-e530. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00261.
6
Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在钙化或小血管病变中的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009189. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
7
Randomised comparison of vascular response to biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting and permanent polymer everolimus eluting stents: An optical coherence tomography study.随机比较生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱和永久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的血管反应:一项光学相干断层扫描研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 1;258:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.011.
8
Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中比较超薄可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的亚组分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007331.
9
Early Vascular Healing Following Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Placement Compared to That with Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架置入后早期血管愈合与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的比较。
Int Heart J. 2021 May 29;62(3):510-519. doi: 10.1536/ihj.20-627. Epub 2021 May 15.
10
Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.超亲生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 25;72(25):3287-3297. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
[[The ultrathin-strut everolimus-eluting stent in a real-world population: the Everythin multicenter registry]].[真实世界人群中的超薄支柱依维莫司洗脱支架:Everythin多中心注册研究]
REC Interv Cardiol. 2025 Feb 24;7(1):23-28. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000484. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of structural features of very thin stents implanted in unprotected left main or coronary bifurcations on clinical outcomes.非常薄的支架在未保护的左主干或冠状动脉分叉处植入的结构特征对临床结果的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):1-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28667. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
2
The comparison of early healing 1-month after PCI among CoCr-everolimus-eluting stent (EES), biodegradable polymer (BP)-EES and BP-sirolimus-eluting stent: Insights from OFDI and coronary angioscopy.钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)、生物可降解聚合物(BP)-EES和BP-西罗莫司洗脱支架术后1个月早期愈合情况的比较:来自光学频率域干涉术(OFDI)和冠状动脉血管内镜检查的见解
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2018 Aug 17;20:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.