• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非常薄的支架在未保护的左主干或冠状动脉分叉处植入的结构特征对临床结果的影响。

Impact of structural features of very thin stents implanted in unprotected left main or coronary bifurcations on clinical outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Savigliano, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):1-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28667. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.28667
PMID:31860158
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the independent clinical impact of stent structural features in a large cohort of patients undergoing unprotected left main (ULM) or coronary bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a range of very thin strut stents.

BACKGROUND

Clinical impact of structural features of contemporary stents remains to be defined.

METHODS

All consecutive patients enrolled in the veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life (RAIN) registry were included. The following stent structural features were studied: antiproliferative drugs (everolimus vs. sirolimus vs. zotarolimus), strut material (platinum-chromium vs. cobalt-chromium), polymer (bioresorbable vs. durable), number of crowns (<8 vs. ≥8) and number of connectors (<3 vs. ≥3). For small diameter stents (≤2.5 mm), struct thickness (74 vs. 80/81 μm) was also tested. Target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis, was the primary endpoint. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Out of 2,707 patients, 110 (4.1%) experienced a TLF event after 16 months (12-18). After adjustment for confounders, an increased number of connectors (adjusted hazard ratio [adj-HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.99, p = .04) reduced risk of TLF, driven by stents with ≥2.5 mm diameter (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.93, p = .02). This independent relationship was lost for stents with diameter <2.5 mm, where only strut thickness appeared to impact. Conversely, no independent relationship of polymer type, number of crowns, and the specific limus-family eluted drug with outcomes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Among a range of contemporary very thin stent models, an increased number of connectors improved device-related outcomes in this investigated high-risk procedural setting.

摘要

目的

在接受无保护左主干(ULM)或冠状动脉分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的大样本患者中,评估支架结构特征的独立临床影响,这些患者使用了一系列非常薄的支架。

背景

目前仍需确定支架结构特征的临床影响。

方法

纳入了 veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life(RAIN)登记研究中的所有连续患者。研究了以下支架结构特征:抗增殖药物(依维莫司、西罗莫司、佐他莫司)、支架材料(铂铬、钴铬)、聚合物(可生物吸收、耐用)、冠数(<8 个 vs. ≥8 个)和连接数(<3 个 vs. ≥3 个)。对于小直径支架(≤2.5mm),还测试了支架厚度(74μm 与 80/81μm)。主要终点是靶病变失败(TLF),即靶病变血运重建和支架血栓形成的复合终点。采用 Cox 回归模型进行多变量分析。

结果

在 2707 例患者中,110 例(4.1%)在 16 个月(12-18 个月)后发生 TLF 事件。调整混杂因素后,连接数的增加(调整后的危险比 [adj-HR]0.62,95%置信区间 [CI]0.39-0.99,p =.04)降低了 TLF 的风险,这主要与直径≥2.5mm 的支架有关(HR0.54,95%CI0.32-0.93,p =.02)。对于直径<2.5mm 的支架,这种独立关系消失,只有支架厚度似乎有影响。相反,聚合物类型、冠数以及洗脱药物的特定 limus 家族与结果之间没有独立关系。

结论

在一系列现代非常薄的支架模型中,在这种高风险的治疗环境中,连接数的增加改善了器械相关的结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of structural features of very thin stents implanted in unprotected left main or coronary bifurcations on clinical outcomes.非常薄的支架在未保护的左主干或冠状动脉分叉处植入的结构特征对临床结果的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):1-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28667. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
2
Impact of the metal-to-artery ratio on clinical outcomes in left main and nonleft main bifurcation: insights the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII study (veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life).金属对动脉比在左主干和非左主干分叉病变患者临床结局中的影响:RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究的见解(真实生活中左主干或分叉病变患者使用 veRy 薄支架)。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Sep;21(9):669-674. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001010.
3
Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:随机 BIOFLOW V 试验 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1343-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019.
4
Comparison of bioresorbable vs durable polymer drug-eluting stents in unprotected left main (from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).无保护左主干时生物可吸收 vs 持久聚合物药物洗脱支架比较(来自 RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究)。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 May 15;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01420-5.
5
Safety and efficacy of polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents versus ultrathin stents in unprotected left main or coronary bifurcation: A propensity score analysis from the RAIN and CHANCE registries.聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与超薄支架治疗无保护左主干或冠状动脉分叉病变的安全性和疗效:RAIN 和 CHANCE 注册研究的倾向评分分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):522-529. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28413. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
6
Outcomes in Patients Treated With Thin-Strut, Very Thin-Strut, or Ultrathin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Small Coronary Vessels: A Prespecified Analysis of the Randomized BIO-RESORT Trial.小血管病变患者中应用薄支架、超薄支架或极薄支架药物洗脱支架的临床结局:随机 BIO-RESORT 试验的预设分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;4(7):659-669. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1776.
7
Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable or Durable Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT.薄、极薄或超薄支架,生物可降解或耐用聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架:BIO-RESORT 的 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1650-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.054. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
8
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
9
1-Year Clinical Outcomes of All Comers Treated With 2 Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of the COMBO and Ultrathin-Strut Orsiro Stents.全人群患者接受 2 款生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架治疗 1 年的临床结局:COMBO 和 Ultrathin-Strut Orsiro 支架倾向性评分匹配比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 13;13(7):820-830. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.023.
10
Everolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Versus Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent for Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice.在常规临床实践中,用于冠状动脉血运重建的依维莫司洗脱可生物降解聚合物与依维莫司洗脱永久性聚合物支架的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1665-1675. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.046. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Techniques: Insights From Computational and Bench Testing Studies.冠状动脉分叉支架置入技术的进展:来自计算和台架测试研究的见解
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2025 Mar;41(3):e70000. doi: 10.1002/cnm.70000.
2
Ultrathin Struts Drug-Eluting Stents: A State-of-the-Art Review.超薄支架药物洗脱支架:最新综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 25;12(9):1378. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091378.
3
Contemporary coronary drug-eluting and coated stents: a mini-review.当代冠状动脉药物洗脱和涂层支架:小型综述。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):20-22. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00731-w. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Early vascular response of ultra-thin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical frequency domain imaging: the EVALUATION study.光学频域成像评估超亲水性聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的早期血管反应:EVALUATION 研究。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jul;36(3):281-288. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00689-9. Epub 2020 Jul 3.