• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prospective Analysis of Radiology Resource Utilization and Outcomes for Participation in Oncology Multidisciplinary Conferences.参与肿瘤多学科会议的放射学资源利用和结果的前瞻性分析。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1219-1224. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Unreimbursed Costs of Multidisciplinary Conferences to a Radiology Department: A Prospective Analysis at an Academic Medical Center.放射科多学科会议的未报销费用:某学术医疗中心的前瞻性分析。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2024 Apr;21(4):668-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.10.015. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
What is the Value of Radiology Input During a Multidisciplinary Orthopaedic Oncology Conference?放射科在多学科骨科肿瘤学会议中的价值是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Oct 1;481(10):2005-2013. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002626. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
4
Subspecialized radiology review at multidisciplinary pancreas conference: impact on patient management.多学科胰腺会议上的放射科亚专业会诊:对患者管理的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Oct;43(10):2783-2789. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1549-5.
5
Development and Assessment of an Information Technology Intervention to Improve the Clarity of Radiologist Follow-up Recommendations.开发和评估信息技术干预措施,以提高放射科医生随访建议的清晰度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e236178. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6178.
6
Streamlining Radiologist Workflow for Multidisciplinary Conferences: A Web-Based System to Represent Radiology.简化放射科医生的多学科会议工作流程:一种用于表示放射学的基于网络的系统。
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Jun;33(3):602-606. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00317-w.
7
Standardizing Multidisciplinary Case Conferences and Improving Communication Between Referring Physicians and Radiologists: A Quality Improvement Initiative.规范多学科病例讨论会并改善转诊医生与放射科医生之间的沟通:一项质量改进计划。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2025 May;76(2):203-211. doi: 10.1177/08465371241281055. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
8
What is the added value of specialist radiology review of multidisciplinary team meeting cases in a tertiary care center?多学科团队会议病例中专科放射学审查的附加值是什么?
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6460-6465. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10680-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
9
Expert radiologist review at a hepatobiliary multidisciplinary tumor board: impact on patient management.肝胆多学科肿瘤委员会的专家放射科医生审查:对患者管理的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Nov;45(11):3800-3808. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02587-3.
10
Assessing the potential versus the actual earnings of academic radiologists: effects of unequal duty service assignments.评估学术放射科医生的潜在收入与实际收入:不平等值班任务分配的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2001 Aug;8(8):782-91. doi: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80587-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Gallbladder and biliary pathology: lessons learned from multidisciplinary conference.胆囊与胆道病理学:多学科会议的经验教训
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Feb;50(2):916-935. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04533-z. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
The future of academic radiology in Europe: challenges and opportunities.欧洲学术放射学的未来:挑战与机遇。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb;35(2):559-561. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11015-9. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
3
Imaging-Based Disease Assessment and Management Recommendations: Impact of Multidisciplinary Sarcoma Tumor Board.基于影像学的疾病评估与管理建议:多学科肉瘤肿瘤委员会的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;16(15):2674. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152674.
4
How to prepare for a bright future of radiology in Europe.如何为欧洲放射学的光明未来做好准备。
Insights Imaging. 2023 Oct 10;14(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01525-3.

参与肿瘤多学科会议的放射学资源利用和结果的前瞻性分析。

Prospective Analysis of Radiology Resource Utilization and Outcomes for Participation in Oncology Multidisciplinary Conferences.

机构信息

Abdominal Imaging and Intervention Section, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Abdominal Imaging and Intervention Section, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1219-1224. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.036
PMID:32622744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7328639/
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Radiology participation is necessary in oncology multidisciplinary conferences (MDCs), but the resources required to do so are often unaccounted for. In this prospective study we provide an analysis of resource utilization as a function of outcomes for all MDCs covered by an entire radiology section and provide a time-based cost estimate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, prospective data on all MDCs covered by abdominal radiologists at a single tertiary care academic center were obtained over nine weeks. A predefined questionnaire was used by a single observer who attended every imaging review and recorded the total time spent by the radiologists and several outcome measures. The total time recorded was used to provide a time-based cost estimate using a national salary survey.

RESULTS

Six radiologists participated in a total of 57 MDCs, with 577 cases reviewed and discussed. 181 (31%) cases were performed at outside facilities requiring full reinterpretation. Clinically significant revisions to original reports were recorded in 107 (18.5%) cases. Radiologist input directly resulted in alteration of cancer staging in 65 (11%) patients and specific recommendations for follow-up diagnostic workup in 280 (48%) of cases. The mean total time devoted by the staff radiologist per week to MDCs was 18.7 hours/week, nearly a half of full-time effort, or 8% of total effort per radiologist. The total annual projected cost of radiology coverage for each weekly MDC was $26,920.

CONCLUSION

Section-wide radiologist participation in MDCs directly resulted in change in clinical management in nearly half of reviewed cases. This was achieved at a notable time cost, highlighting the need for efficient integration of radiology MDC participation into radiologist workflow and compensation models.

摘要

背景与目的

肿瘤多学科诊疗会议(MDC)中需要放射科的参与,但相关资源往往没有得到充分考虑。在本前瞻性研究中,我们对整个放射科涵盖的所有 MDC 进行了资源利用分析,并提供了基于时间的成本估算。

材料与方法

在获得机构审查委员会批准后,前瞻性地收集了在单一三级学术中心工作的腹部放射科医生涵盖的所有 MDC 的数据,为期 9 周。一名观察者使用预定义的问卷出席了每次影像学审查,并记录了放射科医生的总时间以及几个结果指标。使用全国薪资调查,根据记录的总时间提供基于时间的成本估算。

结果

共有 6 名放射科医生参与了总共 57 次 MDC,共审查和讨论了 577 例病例。其中 181 例(31%)在外部机构进行,需要全面重新解读。记录了 107 例(18.5%)原始报告的临床意义重大修订。放射科医生的建议直接导致 65 例(11%)患者的癌症分期改变,以及 280 例(48%)患者的后续诊断性检查的具体建议。每周用于 MDC 的工作人员放射科医生的平均总时间为 18.7 小时/周,接近全职工作的一半,或每位放射科医生的总工作量的 8%。每周一次 MDC 的放射科覆盖的年度总预计成本为 26920 美元。

结论

放射科的全面参与直接导致了近一半审查病例的临床管理改变。这需要付出大量的时间成本,这突显了需要有效地将放射科 MDC 参与融入放射科医生的工作流程和薪酬模式。