• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期胃癌后行根治性胃切除术的手术安全性-1:2 倾向评分匹配分析:一项回顾性单中心研究(队列研究)。

Operative safety of curative gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer - 1:2 propensity score matching analysis: A retrospective single-center study (cohort study).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2020 Aug;80:124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.041
PMID:32622936
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the operative safety and long-term outcomes of additional curative gastrectomy (ACG) after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), as compared with standard gastrectomy (SG) without ESD in patients with early gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 101 patients receiving ACG after non-curative ESD (Post-ESD group) and 1080 patients after SG without ESD (Surgery-only group), between 2009 and 2016, were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between groups, using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, a total of 101 patients in the post-ESD group and 202 patients in the surgery-only group were analyzed. The post-ESD group had shorter operation times than did the surgery-only group (p = 0.005). Estimated blood loss and the incidence of postoperative morbidity did not differ between the two groups, and no differences were observed in pathologic outcomes, including N stage (p = 0.268). In addition, 5-year OS, DSS, and RFS rates were not significantly different between groups (OS; 95.1% vs. 98.2%, p = 0.535, DSS; 98.2% vs. 98.7%, p = 0.956, and RFS; 98.6% vs. 98.9%, p = 0.757, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ACG can be performed safely after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection, with good operative outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)后非治愈性附加根治性胃切除术(ACG)与早期胃癌患者无 ESD 标准胃切除术(SG)相比的手术安全性和长期结果。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 2009 年至 2016 年间接受非治愈性 ESD 后行 ACG(ESD 后组)的 101 例患者和无 ESD 行 SG(单纯手术组)的 1080 例患者的数据。采用倾向评分匹配分析比较两组患者的临床病理特征、总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。

结果

经倾向评分匹配后,ESD 后组共 101 例患者和单纯手术组 202 例患者纳入分析。ESD 后组的手术时间短于单纯手术组(p=0.005)。两组患者的估计出血量和术后发病率无差异,且病理结果包括 N 分期也无差异(p=0.268)。此外,两组患者的 5 年 OS、DSS 和 RFS 率无显著差异(OS:95.1% vs. 98.2%,p=0.535,DSS:98.2% vs. 98.7%,p=0.956,RFS:98.6% vs. 98.9%,p=0.757)。

结论

非治愈性内镜下黏膜剥离术后行 ACG 是安全可行的,且手术效果良好。

相似文献

1
Operative safety of curative gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer - 1:2 propensity score matching analysis: A retrospective single-center study (cohort study).内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期胃癌后行根治性胃切除术的手术安全性-1:2 倾向评分匹配分析:一项回顾性单中心研究(队列研究)。
Int J Surg. 2020 Aug;80:124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Survival Benefit of Additional Surgery After Non-curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.非治愈性内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌后追加手术的生存获益:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(11):3353-3360. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6039-4. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
Propensity score-matched comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for treatment of early gastric cancer in a Western setting.在西方环境中,内镜黏膜下剥离术与手术治疗早期胃癌的短期和长期结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3228-3237. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06609-6. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
Long-term outcomes after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer according to hospital volumes in Japan: a multicenter propensity-matched analysis.日本根据医院容量对早期胃癌非治愈性内镜黏膜下剥离术的长期预后:一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4078-4088. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06710-4. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
Long-term outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection is comparable to that of surgery for early gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的长期疗效与手术相当:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan;21(1):133-143. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0719-4. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
6
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgical resection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study on immediate and long-term outcome over 5 years.早期胃癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术与手术切除的比较:一项关于5年近期和长期结局的回顾性多中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5283-5289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4877-y. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
Noninferiority of additional gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with surgery alone on long-term prognosis: a propensity score matching analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术后追加胃切除术与单纯手术相比对长期预后的非劣效性:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Sep;28(9):1519-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.06.027. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
8
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a comparison study to surgery using propensity score-matched analysis.早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的长期疗效:一项使用倾向评分匹配分析与手术对比的研究
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3762-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4672-1. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
9
Propensity score-matching analysis to compare clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in the postoperative and non-operative stomachs.倾向评分匹配分析,以比较早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术在术后胃和非手术胃中的临床结局。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0855-2.
10
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期胃癌内镜下黏膜下剥离术与手术的长期疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;31(4):418-424. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001352.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and invasion depth in early gastric cancer: Analysis of 210 cases.早期胃癌淋巴结转移及浸润深度的危险因素:210例分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Dec 27;16(12):3720-3728. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3720.
2
Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in node-negative gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.淋巴管浸润对无淋巴结转移胃癌的预后影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec 20;22(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03629-6.
3
Endoscopy First: The Best Choice to Optimize Outcomes for Early Gastrointestinal Malignancy.
内镜优先:优化早期胃肠道恶性肿瘤治疗效果的最佳选择。
Visc Med. 2024 Jun;40(3):107-109. doi: 10.1159/000539178. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
4
Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography in staging gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.增强超声造影对胃癌分期的诊断效能:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 5;24(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12210-z.
5
Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer.早期胃癌患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术与手术的比较。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 24;14(15):3603. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153603.
6
Applicability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with early gastric cancer beyond the expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜黏膜下剥离术在超出内镜黏膜下剥离术适应证的早期胃癌患者中的适用性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8349-8357. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09288-6. Epub 2022 May 11.