Abdelfatah Mohamed M, Barakat Mohamed, Ahmad Dina, Ibrahim Mariam, Ahmed Yahia, Kurdi Yahia, Grimm Ian S, Othman Mohamed O
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, East Carolina University, Greenville.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;31(4):418-424. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001352.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and gastrectomy with lymph node dissection are considered acceptable treatment modalities for early gastric cancer (EGC). In the last decade, ESD has become more favorable than surgery as it offers faster recovery, lower costs, and a superior quality of life when compared to gastrectomy. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcome of ESD versus surgery in EGC. We performed a systematic and comprehensive search of major reference databases (Medline, Embase, CINHAL) for all studies that compared the outcome of EGC for patients underwent ESD or surgery in the same cohort. A systematic review was conducted through November 2017, using pooled analysis to calculate 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, disease-specific survival (DSS) rate, disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of ESD versus gastrectomy. Five-year OS and DSS were similar between ESD and gastrectomy groups 96 versus 96% and 99.4 versus 99.2%, respectively. Likewise, DFS was similar in both groups 95.9 versus 98.5% odds ratio 1.86 (0.57-6.0) P=0.3. However, ESD had a lower RFS compared to surgery 92.4 versus 98.3% odds ratio 0.17 (0.1-4.9) P=0.001. Overall, there was a higher recurrence rate in patients who underwent ESD compared to surgery [40/2943 (1.4%) vs. 12/3116 (0.4) risk ratio (RR) 2.5 (1.3-4.8) P=0.005]. Moreover, synchronous and metachronous cancers were more prevalent in the ESD group compared to the surgery group [1.5 vs. 0.1% RR 5.7 (1.5-21.9) P=0.01] [16/1082 (1.5%) vs. 1/1485 (0.1%) RR 10.1 (5.9-17.1) P=0.0001]. Five-year OS, DSS and DFS were similar between ESD and surgery groups. However, recurrent, synchronous and metachronous cancers were more prevalent in patients treated by ESD compared to patients treated by surgery, resulting in a lower RFS. Adequate surveillance with upper endoscopy is crucial after ESD to detect early recurrence and metachronous lesions.
内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)和胃癌根治术加淋巴结清扫术被认为是早期胃癌(EGC)可接受的治疗方式。在过去十年中,ESD比手术更受青睐,因为与胃癌根治术相比,它恢复更快、成本更低且生活质量更高。本研究的目的是比较ESD与手术治疗EGC的长期疗效。我们对主要参考文献数据库(Medline、Embase、CINHAL)进行了系统全面的检索,以查找所有在同一队列中比较接受ESD或手术治疗的EGC患者疗效的研究。通过2017年11月进行了一项系统评价,采用汇总分析来计算ESD与胃癌根治术的5年总生存率(OS)、疾病特异性生存率(DSS)、无病生存率(DFS)和无复发生存率(RFS)。ESD组和胃癌根治术组的5年OS和DSS相似,分别为96%对96%和99.4%对99.2%。同样,两组的DFS相似,分别为95.9%对98.5%,优势比为1.86(0.57 - 6.0),P = 0.3。然而,与手术相比,ESD的RFS较低,分别为92.4%对98.3%,优势比为0.17(0.1 - 4.9),P = 0.001。总体而言,接受ESD治疗的患者复发率高于手术患者[40/2943(1.4%)对12/3116(0.4%),风险比(RR)为2.5(1.3 - 4.8),P = 0.005]。此外,与手术组相比,ESD组的同时性和异时性癌更为普遍[1.5%对0.1%,RR为5.7(1.5 - 21.9),P = 0.01][16/1082(1.5%)对1/1485(0.1%),RR为10.1(5.9 - 17.1),P = 0.0001]。ESD组和手术组的5年OS、DSS和DFS相似。然而,与手术治疗的患者相比,ESD治疗的患者复发性、同时性和异时性癌更为普遍,导致RFS较低。ESD术后进行充分的上消化道内镜监测对于检测早期复发和异时性病变至关重要。