Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Department of Radiology, Wuhan General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuhan, China.
Acad Radiol. 2021 Oct;28(10):e306-e313. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
Deformable registration algorithms (DRA) has been used to detect left ventricular myocardial changes, however, its clinical utility in right ventricular (RV) function has not been evaluated. In this study, we aim to evaluate and compare quantitative RV strain assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance in pulmonary hypertension (PH) using feature tracking (FT) and DRA.
Thirty patients were confirmed to have PH using right heart catheterization, and 16 healthy controls were evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance. Global and segmental RV strain was measured by DRA and FT methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), coefficient of variation, and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess and compare the interobserver and intraobserver variability of the DRA and FT methods.
DRA was more sensitive than FT in the detection of RV circumferential and septal dysfunction. The global longitudinal strain (GLS) obtained by the two methods was reduced in mild-moderate PH patients (mean pulmonary artery pressure≤45 mm Hg), and the GLS and global circumferential strain (GCS) were reduced in severe PH patients (mean pulmonary artery pressure >45 mm Hg). DRA and FT methods demonstrate similar observer agreement in global strain using ICC (ICC greater than 0.90), but RV strain derived from DRA had lower variability using COV ([8%-14%] for DRA versus [11%-39%] for FT).For segmental longitudinal strain, DRA showed higher ICC and lower COV compared with that of the FT method. Correlations between RVEF and RV global strain parameters were strong (p < 0.01):GLS-DRA, r = -0.696; GLS-FT, r = -0.832; GCS-DRA, r = -0.745; and GCS-FT, r = -0.817. GLS-DRA was weakly correlated with mPAP (r = 0.385, p < 0.05).In multiple linear regression analysis, RVEF and mPAP were independent predictors of GLS-DRA (R = 0.57, p < 0.01).
The DRA method is more sensitive and robust for RV myocardial strain measurements than FT method.
变形配准算法(DRA)已被用于检测左心室心肌变化,但尚未评估其在右心室(RV)功能中的临床应用。本研究旨在使用心脏磁共振评估和比较肺动脉高压(PH)患者中 DRA 和特征跟踪(FT)定量 RV 应变。
通过右心导管术确诊 30 例 PH 患者,16 例健康对照者接受心脏磁共振检查。采用 DRA 和 FT 方法测量 RV 整体和节段应变。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、变异系数(COV)和 Bland-Altman 分析评估和比较 DRA 和 FT 方法的观察者内和观察者间的可变性。
与 FT 方法相比,DRA 方法在检测 RV 圆周和间隔功能障碍方面更敏感。两种方法均显示轻中度 PH 患者(平均肺动脉压≤45mmHg)的整体纵向应变(GLS)降低,重度 PH 患者(平均肺动脉压>45mmHg)的 GLS 和整体圆周应变(GCS)降低。DRA 和 FT 方法在整体应变的观察者间一致性方面均表现出较高的 ICC(ICC>0.90),但 DRA 法衍生的 RV 应变的 COV 较低[(8%-14%)比(11%-39%)]。对于节段纵向应变,DRA 法的 ICC 较高,COV 较低。RVEF 与 RV 整体应变参数之间具有较强的相关性(p<0.01):GLS-DRA,r=-0.696;GLS-FT,r=-0.832;GCS-DRA,r=-0.745;GCS-FT,r=-0.817。GLS-DRA 与 mPAP 呈弱相关(r=0.385,p<0.05)。在多元线性回归分析中,RVEF 和 mPAP 是 GLS-DRA 的独立预测因子(R=0.57,p<0.01)。
与 FT 方法相比,DRA 方法对 RV 心肌应变的测量更敏感、更稳健。