• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农药残留膳食摄入量预测指南。粮农组织/世卫组织联合磋商会议。

Guidelines for predicting the dietary intake of pesticide residues. Joint FAO/WHO consultation.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1988;66(4):429-34.

PMID:3262445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2491174/
Abstract

These guidelines have been developed to describe procedures for predicting the dietary intake of pesticide residues, and will assist national authorities in their considerations of the acceptability of the Codex maximum residue limits (MRLs). The relevant authorities are invited to consider the basic approaches described in these guidelines, which have been designed to provide reasonable assurance that such MRLs would not result in dietary intakes that exceed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of a pesticide.

摘要

制定这些准则旨在描述预测农药残留膳食摄入量的程序,并将协助各国主管当局考虑食品法典委员会最大残留限量(MRLs)的可接受性。请相关主管当局考虑这些准则中所述的基本方法,其目的是提供合理保证,即此类最大残留限量不会导致膳食摄入量超过农药的每日允许摄入量(ADI)。

相似文献

1
Guidelines for predicting the dietary intake of pesticide residues. Joint FAO/WHO consultation.农药残留膳食摄入量预测指南。粮农组织/世卫组织联合磋商会议。
Bull World Health Organ. 1988;66(4):429-34.
2
Chronic dietary risk for pesticide residues in food in Brazil: an update.巴西食品中农药残留的慢性膳食风险:最新情况
Food Addit Contam. 2004 Nov;21(11):1057-64. doi: 10.1080/02652030400009225.
3
[Dietary risk assessment for pesticide residues in food of plant origin during the plant protection product's registration process].[植物保护产品注册过程中植物源食品中农药残留的膳食风险评估]
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2006;57(4):303-15.
4
Codex alimentarius approach to pesticide residue standards.食品法典委员会制定农药残留标准的方法。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1989 May-Jun;72(3):538-41.
5
Acute intake assessment: evolution within the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues. WHO Joint Secretary of the Joint FAO/WHO meeting on pesticide residues JMPR.急性摄入量评估:食品法典农药残留委员会的进展。世卫组织粮农组织/世卫组织农药残留联席会议联合秘书
Food Addit Contam. 2000 Jul;17(7):551-5. doi: 10.1080/026520300412447.
6
Global Harmonization of Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides.全球农药最大残留限量协调
J Agric Food Chem. 2016 Jan 13;64(1):30-5. doi: 10.1021/jf505347z. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
7
Joint FAO/WHO Geneva consultation--acute dietary intake methodology.
Food Addit Contam. 2000 Jul;17(7):557-62. doi: 10.1080/026520300412456.
8
Relevance of integrating agricultural practices in pesticide dietary intake indicator.将农业实践纳入农药膳食摄入量指标的相关性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Oct;46(10):3240-53. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
9
[Consumer risk assessment in case of maximum residue levels (MRLs) violations in food].[食品中最大残留限量(MRLs)违规情况下的消费者风险评估]
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2007;58(2):377-88.
10
Background to the ADI/TDI/PTWI.每日允许摄入量/暂定每日允许摄入量/每日耐受摄入量的背景知识。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1999 Oct;30(2 Pt 2):S109-13. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1999.1335.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk assessment of pesticide residues ingestion in food offered by institutional restaurant menus.机构餐厅菜单提供的食物中农药残留摄入的风险评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 18;19(12):e0313836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313836. eCollection 2024.
2
Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in some personal care products in Nigeria.尼日利亚部分个人护理产品中多环芳烃(PAHs)和有机氯农药(OCPs)的测定
Toxicol Rep. 2018 Oct 5;5:994-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.10.003. eCollection 2018.
3
Magnitude of cyantraniliprole residues in tomato following open field application: pre-harvest interval determination and risk assessment.露天田间施用后番茄中氰虫酰胺残留量:收获前间隔期的确定及风险评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Feb 5;190(3):116. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6496-7.
4
Residue pattern and dietary intake of persistent organochlorine compounds in foodstuffs from Vietnam.越南食品中持久性有机氯化合物的残留模式与膳食摄入量。
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992 May;22(4):367-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00212555.