Aguilar Fernando, Crebelli Riccardo, Di Domenico Alessandro, Dusemund Birgit, Frutos Maria Jose, Galtier Pierre, Gott David, Gundert-Remy Ursula, Lambré Claude, Leblanc Jean-Charles, Lindtner Oliver, Moldeus Peter, Mosesso Pasquale, Parent-Massin Dominique, Oskarsson Agneta, Stankovic Ivan, Waalkens-Berendsen Ine, Woutersen Rudolf Antonius, Wright Matthew, Younes Maged, Ciccolallo Laura, Colombo Paolo, Lodi Federica, Mortensen Alicja
EFSA J. 2017 May 8;15(5):e04784. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4784. eCollection 2017 May.
The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., 2016). Sucralose (E 955) is authorised as a food additive in the EU in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives. According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the full re-evaluation of sucralose shall be completed by December 2020. Taking into consideration the publication from Soffritti et al. (2016), the technical report and additional information provided by the Ramazzini Institute and other information available for sucralose (E 955), the Panel noted: (i) the design of the bioassay that considers exposure from gestation up to natural death of animals implies an increase in background pathology that results in the possibility of misclassifications and a difficult interpretation of data, especially in the absence of both an appropriate concurrent control group and a recent historical database; (ii) the lack of a dose-response relationship between the exposure to sucralose and incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias (combined); (iii) the lack of a mode of action and failure to meet all the Bradford-Hill considerations for a cause-effect relationship between intake of sucralose and the development of tumours in male mice only; (iv) a comprehensive database was available for sucralose and no carcinogenic effect was reported in adequate studies in rats and mice. Moreover, there was no reliable evidence of genotoxicity. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the available data did not support the conclusions of the authors (Soffritti et al., 2016) that sucralose induced haematopoietic neoplasias in male Swiss mice.
应欧盟委员会要求,食品添加剂及添加到食品中的营养源(ANS)专家委员会就拉马齐尼研究所进行的一项关于三氯蔗糖(E 955)致癌潜力的小鼠研究结论的有效性发表声明(索弗里蒂等人,2016年)。根据欧盟关于食品添加剂的第(EC)No 1333/2008号条例附件二,三氯蔗糖(E 955)在欧盟被批准作为食品添加剂。根据欧盟委员会第(EU)No 257/2010号条例,三氯蔗糖的全面重新评估应在2020年12月前完成。考虑到索弗里蒂等人(2016年)的出版物、拉马齐尼研究所提供的技术报告和其他信息以及三氯蔗糖(E 955)的其他可用信息,专家委员会指出:(i)生物测定的设计考虑了从妊娠到动物自然死亡的暴露情况,这意味着背景病理学增加,导致可能出现错误分类和数据解释困难,特别是在没有适当的同期对照组和近期历史数据库的情况下;(ii)三氯蔗糖暴露与淋巴瘤和白血病(合并)发病率之间缺乏剂量反应关系;(iii)缺乏作用模式,并且仅在雄性小鼠中,摄入三氯蔗糖与肿瘤发生之间未能满足所有布拉德福德-希尔因果关系考量;(iv)有一个关于三氯蔗糖的综合数据库,在大鼠和小鼠的充分研究中未报告致癌作用。此外,没有可靠的遗传毒性证据。因此,专家委员会得出结论,现有数据不支持作者(索弗里蒂等人,2016年)关于三氯蔗糖在雄性瑞士小鼠中诱发造血系统肿瘤的结论。