• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme aqualysin 1 from a genetically modified (strain LMGS 25520).来自转基因(菌株LMGS 25520)的食品酶嗜热栖热菌蛋白酶1的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05170. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5170. eCollection 2018 May.
2
Safety evaluation of food enzyme xylanase from a genetically modified (strain LMG S-27588).来自转基因(菌株LMG S-27588)的食品酶木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05169. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5169. eCollection 2018 May.
3
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme xylanase from a genetically modified   strain TD160(229).来自转基因菌株TD160(229)的食品酶木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 22;16(1):e05008. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5008. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme maltogenic amylase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-SM).来自转基因(菌株NZYM-SM)的食品酶麦芽ogenic淀粉酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05171. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5171. eCollection 2018 May.
5
Revised safety evaluation of the food enzyme aqualysin 1 from the genetically modified strain LMG S-25520 produced by a modified process.对通过改良工艺生产的转基因菌株LMG S-25520所产食品酶嗜热栖热菌蛋白酶1的安全性评估修订版
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 12;23(3):e9288. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9288. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain LMG S-24584).来自转基因(菌株LMG S - 24584)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Oct 31;16(10):e05447. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5447. eCollection 2018 Oct.
7
Safety evaluation of food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltohydrolase produced with a genetically modified (strain MAM).用转基因(菌株MAM)生产的食品酶1,4-α-麦芽低聚糖苷酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05168. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5168. eCollection 2018 May.
8
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltotetraohydrolase from   (strain DP-Dzf24).来自(菌株DP-Dzf24)的食品酶葡聚糖1,4-α-麦芽四糖水解酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Jun 14;17(6):e05739. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5739. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-CE).来自转基因(菌株NZYM-CE)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 30;17(4):e05685. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5685. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain XEA).来自转基因(XEA菌株)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Apr 27;16(4):e05228. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5228. eCollection 2018 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Revised safety evaluation of the food enzyme aqualysin 1 from the genetically modified strain LMG S-25520 produced by a modified process.对通过改良工艺生产的转基因菌株LMG S-25520所产食品酶嗜热栖热菌蛋白酶1的安全性评估修订版
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 12;23(3):e9288. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9288. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Why can patients with baker's asthma tolerate wheat flour ingestion? Is wheat pollen allergy relevant?为什么患面包师哮喘的患者能耐受摄入小麦粉?小麦花粉过敏与之有关吗?
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2009 Jul-Aug;37(4):203-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
2
Investigation on possible allergenicity of 19 different commercial enzymes used in the food industry.食品工业中使用的19种不同商业酶的潜在致敏性调查。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2006 Nov;44(11):1909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.06.012. Epub 2006 Jul 4.
3
Allergy assessment of foods or ingredients derived from biotechnology, gene-modified organisms, or novel foods.对源自生物技术、基因改造生物或新型食品的食品或成分进行过敏评估。
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2004 Nov;48(6):413-23. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200400029.
4
Baker's asthma.贝克氏哮喘
Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jul;59(7):498-502; quiz 502, 426. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.7.498.
5
Clinical responses to ingested fungal alpha-amylase and hemicellulase in persons sensitized to Aspergillus fumigatus?对烟曲霉致敏者摄入真菌α-淀粉酶和半纤维素酶后的临床反应?
Allergy. 1997 Mar;52(3):346-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb01003.x.

来自转基因(菌株LMGS 25520)的食品酶嗜热栖热菌蛋白酶1的安全性评估。

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme aqualysin 1 from a genetically modified (strain LMGS 25520).

作者信息

Silano Vittorio, Bolognesi Claudia, Castle Laurence, Chipman Kevin, Cravedi Jean-Pierre, Fowler Paul, Franz Roland, Grob Konrad, Gürtler Rainer, Husøy Trine, Kärenlampi Sirpa, Mennes Wim, Milana Maria Rosaria, Pfaff Karla, Riviere Gilles, Srinivasan Jannavi, Tavares Poças Maria de Fátima, Tlustos Christina, Wölfle Detlef, Zorn Holger, Chesson Andrew, Glandorf Boet, Herman Lieve, Jany Klaus-Dieter, Marcon Francesca, Penninks André, Smith Andrew, Želježić Davor, Aguilera-Gómez Margarita, Andryszkiewicz Magdalena, Arcella Davide, Kovalkovičová Natália, Liu Yi, Engel Karl-Heinz

出版信息

EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05170. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5170. eCollection 2018 May.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5170
PMID:32625892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7009595/
Abstract

The food enzyme considered in this opinion is aqualysin 1 (EC 3.4.21.111), produced from the genetically modified strain LMGS 25520 by Puratos NV. The production strain was not detected in the food enzyme. Aqualysin 1 is intended to be used in baking processes. Based on the maximum use level recommended and individual consumption data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 2.13 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests indicated no genotoxic concerns. The allergenicity was evaluated by searching for similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens and 23 matches were found (20 respiratory and 3 dermal allergens). However, the Panel considered that there are no indications for food allergic reactions to the food enzyme. The genetic modifications performed, the manufacturing process, the compositional and biochemical data, the allergenicity and the genotoxicity assessment did not raise safety concerns. The Panel considered the margin of exposure (MOE) calculated from the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) determined from the repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study and the estimated dietary exposure as insufficient to conclude that there is no safety concern for this food enzyme under the intended conditions of use. The Panel noted that recombinant DNA was present in all batches of the food enzyme tested.

摘要

本意见所考虑的食品酶是嗜热栖热菌蛋白酶1(EC 3.4.21.111),由Puratos NV公司的转基因菌株LMGS 25520生产。在该食品酶中未检测到生产菌株。嗜热栖热菌蛋白酶1拟用于烘焙过程。根据欧洲食品安全局综合欧洲食品消费数据库推荐的最大使用水平和个体消费数据,估计欧洲人群通过膳食接触该食品酶的总有机固体(TOS)最高可达每天2.13毫克TOS/千克体重。遗传毒性试验表明不存在遗传毒性问题。通过搜索氨基酸序列与已知过敏原的相似性对致敏性进行了评估,发现有23个匹配项(20种呼吸道过敏原和3种皮肤过敏原)。然而,专家小组认为没有迹象表明对该食品酶会发生食物过敏反应。所进行的基因改造、制造工艺、成分和生化数据、致敏性和遗传毒性评估均未引发安全问题。专家小组认为,根据重复剂量90天经口毒性研究确定的未观察到不良作用水平(NOAEL)计算得出的暴露边际(MOE)以及估计的膳食暴露量,不足以得出在预期使用条件下该食品酶不存在安全问题的结论。专家小组注意到,在所有测试批次的食品酶中均存在重组DNA。