• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品工业中使用的19种不同商业酶的潜在致敏性调查。

Investigation on possible allergenicity of 19 different commercial enzymes used in the food industry.

作者信息

Bindslev-Jensen Carsten, Skov Per Stahl, Roggen Erwin L, Hvass Peter, Brinch Ditte Sidelmann

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense University Hospital, DK 5000 Odense C, Denmark.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2006 Nov;44(11):1909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.06.012. Epub 2006 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2006.06.012
PMID:16920243
Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the safety to allergic patients of 19 commercially available and authority-approved enzymes used in the food industry. Enzymes produced by genetically modified organisms were included. Four hundred consecutive adult patients with a diagnosed allergy to inhalation allergens, food allergens, bee or wasp were included. All had at least one positive skin prick test to the above allergens. Skin prick testing with the 19 enzymes was performed on the forearm and if positive (in 13 patients), in vitro histamine release from blood basophils were performed. Patients with positive results in skin prick test were subsequently reinvestigated with further purified enzymes and finally challenged orally with the enzymes in a double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol. Only one reaction to a placebo challenge was seen. In some instances a positive skin prick test result or a positive histamine release was seen elicited by the enzymes, but since none of the patients were positive to any of the commercial enzymes in the subsequent oral challenges using exaggerated dosages of the enzymes compared to normal daily intake, the findings are without clinical relevance. A wide variety of enzyme classes and origins was included in the study. Because there were no allergenic findings of clinical relevance it is concluded that ingestion of food enzymes in general is not considered to be a concern with regard to food allergy.

摘要

该研究的目的是调查食品工业中使用的19种市售且经权威机构批准的酶对过敏患者的安全性。其中包括转基因生物产生的酶。纳入了400名连续的成年患者,他们被诊断对吸入性过敏原、食物过敏原、蜜蜂或黄蜂过敏。所有人对上述过敏原的皮肤点刺试验至少有一项呈阳性。在前臂对这19种酶进行皮肤点刺试验,如果呈阳性(13名患者),则进行血液嗜碱性粒细胞的体外组胺释放试验。皮肤点刺试验结果呈阳性的患者随后用进一步纯化的酶进行重新检测,最后按照双盲、安慰剂对照方案口服这些酶进行激发试验。仅观察到1例对安慰剂激发试验的反应。在某些情况下,酶引发了阳性皮肤点刺试验结果或阳性组胺释放,但由于在随后使用与正常每日摄入量相比过量的酶进行口服激发试验时,没有患者对任何一种市售酶呈阳性反应,因此这些发现无临床意义。该研究纳入了多种酶类和来源。由于没有具有临床意义的确认为过敏原的发现,因此得出结论,一般而言,摄入食物酶对于食物过敏来说不被视为一个问题。

相似文献

1
Investigation on possible allergenicity of 19 different commercial enzymes used in the food industry.食品工业中使用的19种不同商业酶的潜在致敏性调查。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2006 Nov;44(11):1909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.06.012. Epub 2006 Jul 4.
2
A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled oral challenge study to evaluate the allergenicity of commercial, food-grade fish gelatin.一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照口服激发试验,以评估商业食品级鱼明胶的致敏性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2004 Dec;42(12):2037-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.08.008.
3
A mutant of the major apple allergen, Mal d 1, demonstrating hypo-allergenicity in the target organ by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge.一种主要苹果过敏原Mal d 1的突变体,通过双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验证明其在靶器官中具有低致敏性。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Dec;35(12):1638-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02390.x.
4
Profilin sensitization detected in the office by skin prick test: a study of prevalence and clinical relevance of profilin as a plant food allergen.通过皮肤点刺试验在门诊检测到的肌动蛋白结合蛋白致敏:关于肌动蛋白结合蛋白作为植物性食物过敏原的患病率及临床相关性的研究
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Jun;38(6):1033-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02980.x. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
5
Specific allergy to Penaeus monodon (seawater shrimp) or Macrobrachium rosenbergii (freshwater shrimp) in shrimp-allergic children.虾类过敏儿童对斑节对虾(海水虾)或罗氏沼虾(淡水虾)的特异性过敏。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Jun;38(6):1038-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02979.x.
6
In vivo assessment with prick-to-prick testing and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge of allergenicity of apple cultivars.通过针刺试验和双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验对苹果品种的致敏性进行体内评估。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Nov;116(5):1080-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
7
Prevalence and relevance of the positivity of skin prick testing in patients with chronic urticaria.慢性荨麻疹患者皮肤点刺试验阳性的患病率及相关性
J Dermatol. 2008 Jun;35(6):330-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2008.00477.x.
8
Wheat allergy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults.小麦过敏:一项针对成年人的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb;117(2):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.10.014.
9
[Food challenges in children with asthma].[哮喘儿童的食物激发试验]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Jul;23(133):22-9.
10
[Clinical usefulness of histamine release test in determining allergens in food hypersensitivity].[组胺释放试验在确定食物过敏中的过敏原方面的临床实用性]
Arerugi. 1993 Aug;42(8):900-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Genotoxicity Evaluation of the Fungal Alpha-Amylase Enzyme on .关于真菌α-淀粉酶酶的遗传毒性评估研究 。 你提供的原文似乎不完整,后面缺少具体的研究对象等相关内容。
Biology (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;14(3):219. doi: 10.3390/biology14030219.
2
Role of commercial enzymes in wine production: a critical review of recent research.商业酶在葡萄酒生产中的作用:近期研究的批判性综述
J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;58(1):9-21. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04489-0. Epub 2020 May 2.
3
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucose oxidase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-KP).
来自转基因(菌株NZYM-KP)的食品酶葡萄糖氧化酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 6;16(7):e05319. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5319. eCollection 2018 Jul.
4
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α-amylase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-AV).来自转基因(NZYM-AV 菌株)的食品酶α-淀粉酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 12;16(7):e05318. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5318. eCollection 2018 Jul.
5
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha-amylase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-AN).来自转基因(菌株NZYM-AN)的食品酶α-淀粉酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 6;16(7):e05317. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5317. eCollection 2018 Jul.
6
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme maltogenic amylase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-SM).来自转基因(菌株NZYM-SM)的食品酶麦芽ogenic淀粉酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05171. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5171. eCollection 2018 May.
7
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme aqualysin 1 from a genetically modified (strain LMGS 25520).来自转基因(菌株LMGS 25520)的食品酶嗜热栖热菌蛋白酶1的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05170. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5170. eCollection 2018 May.
8
Safety evaluation of food enzyme xylanase from a genetically modified (strain LMG S-27588).来自转基因(菌株LMG S-27588)的食品酶木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05169. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5169. eCollection 2018 May.
9
Safety evaluation of food enzyme glucan 1,4-α-maltohydrolase produced with a genetically modified (strain MAM).用转基因(菌株MAM)生产的食品酶1,4-α-麦芽低聚糖苷酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05168. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5168. eCollection 2018 May.
10
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain XEA).来自转基因(XEA菌株)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Apr 27;16(4):e05228. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5228. eCollection 2018 Apr.