• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from (strain XAS).来自(菌株XAS)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Jan 11;17(1):e05550. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5550. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-CE).来自转基因(菌株NZYM-CE)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 30;17(4):e05685. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5685. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain LMG S-24584).来自转基因(菌株LMG S - 24584)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Oct 31;16(10):e05447. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5447. eCollection 2018 Oct.
4
Safety evaluation of food enzyme xylanase from a genetically modified (strain LMG S-27588).来自转基因(菌株LMG S-27588)的食品酶木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 May 2;16(5):e05169. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5169. eCollection 2018 May.
5
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-FA).来自转基因(菌株NZYM-FA)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Nov 16;16(11):e05480. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5480. eCollection 2018 Nov.
6
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme xylanase from the genetically modified Inui strain RF7398.来自转基因犬吠菌株RF7398的食品酶木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2020 Jan 20;18(1):e05971. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5971. eCollection 2020 Jan.
7
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the non-genetically modified strain LYX.来自非转基因菌株LYX的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 12;21(7):e08085. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8085. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the genetically modified strain RF5427.来自转基因菌株RF5427的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2020 Jun 3;18(6):e06127. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6127. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the genetically modified strain NZYM-ER.来自转基因菌株NZYM-ER的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 13;20(6):e07373. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7373. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain DP-Nzd22).来自转基因(菌株DP-Nzd22)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Nov 30;16(11):e05479. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5479. eCollection 2018 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidance on allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants.转基因植物致敏性评估指南。
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 22;15(6):e04862. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4862. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Why can patients with baker's asthma tolerate wheat flour ingestion? Is wheat pollen allergy relevant?为什么患面包师哮喘的患者能耐受摄入小麦粉?小麦花粉过敏与之有关吗?
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2009 Jul-Aug;37(4):203-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
3
The origins of 168, W23, and other Bacillus subtilis legacy strains.168、W23及其他枯草芽孢杆菌传统菌株的起源。
J Bacteriol. 2008 Nov;190(21):6983-95. doi: 10.1128/JB.00722-08. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
4
Allergy assessment of foods or ingredients derived from biotechnology, gene-modified organisms, or novel foods.对源自生物技术、基因改造生物或新型食品的食品或成分进行过敏评估。
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2004 Nov;48(6):413-23. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200400029.
5
Prevalence of sensitisation to cellulase and xylanase in bakery workers.面包店工人对纤维素酶和木聚糖酶的致敏率
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Oct;60(10):802-4. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.10.802.
6
Baker's asthma.贝克氏哮喘
Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jul;59(7):498-502; quiz 502, 426. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.7.498.
7
Baker's asthma due to xylanase and cellulase without sensitization to alpha-amylase and only weak sensitization to flour.由木聚糖酶和纤维素酶引起的贝克哮喘,对α淀粉酶无致敏反应,仅对面粉有微弱致敏反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2001 Apr;124(4):502-5. doi: 10.1159/000053786.
8
Baking additives as new allergens in baker's asthma.烘焙添加剂作为面包师哮喘的新过敏原
Respiration. 1988;54(1):70-2. doi: 10.1159/000195503.

来自(菌株XAS)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from (strain XAS).

作者信息

Silano Vittorio, Barat Baviera José Manuel, Bolognesi Claudia, Brüschweiler Beat Johannes, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro, Crebelli Riccardo, Gott David Michael, Grob Konrad, Lampi Evgenia, Mortensen Alicja, Rivière Gilles, Steffensen Inger-Lise, Tlustos Christina, Van Loveren Henk, Vernis Laurence, Zorn Holger, Herman Lieve, Jany Klaus-Dieter, Aguilera Jaime, Aguilera-Gómez Margarita, Andryszkiewicz Magdalena, Arcella Davide, Gomes Ana, Kovalkovičová Natalia, Liu Yi, Chesson Andrew

出版信息

EFSA J. 2019 Jan 11;17(1):e05550. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5550. eCollection 2019 Jan.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5550
PMID:32626095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7009094/
Abstract

The food enzyme is an endo-1,4-β-xylanase (4-β-d-xylan xylanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.8) produced with the genetically modified strain XAS. Antibiotic resistance genes are present in the production organism on a self-replicative vector. The endo-1,4-β-xylanase is intended to be used in baking processes. Based on the maximum use levels, dietary exposure to the food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.014 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 55 mg TOS/kg bw per day that, compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a sufficiently high margin of exposure (MOE) (of at least 3,600). Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood to occur is considered to be low. Since the absence of viable cells in the food enzyme has not been adequately demonstrated, the Panel cannot conclude on the risks associated with the possible spread of a genetically modified bacterial strain carrying antimicrobial resistance determinants.

摘要

这种食品酶是一种内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶(4-β-D-木聚糖木聚糖水解酶;EC 3.2.1.8),由转基因菌株XAS生产。生产生物体中存在于自我复制载体上的抗生素抗性基因。该内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶拟用于烘焙过程。根据最大使用量,估计欧洲人群通过饮食接触该食品酶的总有机固体(TOS)最高可达每天0.014毫克TOS/千克体重(bw)。遗传毒性试验未引发安全担忧。通过对大鼠进行的重复剂量90天口服毒性研究评估了全身毒性。专家小组确定的无观察到不良反应水平(NOAEL)为每天55毫克TOS/千克bw,与估计的饮食接触量相比,产生了足够高的接触边际(MOE)(至少为3600)。搜索了该氨基酸序列与已知过敏原的氨基酸序列的相似性,未发现匹配。专家小组认为,在预期的使用条件下,不能排除通过饮食接触引起过敏致敏和激发反应的风险,但认为发生的可能性较低。由于尚未充分证明食品酶中不存在活细胞,专家小组无法就与携带抗微生物抗性决定因素的转基因细菌菌株可能传播相关的风险得出结论。