Suppr超能文献

青少年关系骚扰与虐待量表(MARSHA)的开发:来自黑人、多族裔、拉丁裔、美国原住民和 LGBTQ+ 青年的意见。

The Development of the Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA): Input From Black and Multiracial, Latinx, Native American, and LGBTQ+ Youth.

作者信息

Rothman Emily F, Paruk Jennifer, Cuevas Carlos A, Temple Jeff R, Gonzales Kelly

机构信息

Boston University School of Public Health, MA, USA.

Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):2126-2149. doi: 10.1177/0886260520936367. Epub 2020 Jul 5.

Abstract

This formative research study was designed to collect opinion data from adolescents historically underrepresented in adolescent dating abuse (ADA) research measure development. Eight in-person focus groups and 7 telephone-based one-on-one interviews were conducted with U.S. youth aged from 11 to 20 years (=48). We conducted two focus groups with Black, Multiracial, Latinx, Native American, and LGBTQ+ youth. Seven LGBTQ+ youth participated in one-on-one telephone-based interviews. Focus group participants and interview subjects were asked the same 11 questions from a semi-structured focus group question guide. Five questions were on the topic of dating behaviors in general. In addition, six questions were asked for reactions to a paper-based list of 75 abusive acts. Youth generated ideas for 10 new possible cyber-ADA items and 14 emotionally abusive items for inclusion on the ADA measurement instrument. They did not generate any new physical or sexual ADA items. Youth identified 14 acts that they felt should not be on the measure, either because the acts were not abusive and too common, because they could not understand the item, or because it seemed unrealistic as an act of ADA. The study faced several limitations and was a good first step toward enriching the cultural inclusivity of ADA measurement instrument. Continued attention to inclusionary research that seeks to understand the cultural milieux of diverse participants is essential for violence prevention scholarship and subsequent health programming and policy that derive from it.

摘要

这项形成性研究旨在从历史上在青少年约会暴力(ADA)研究测量工具开发中代表性不足的青少年那里收集意见数据。我们对11至20岁的美国青少年进行了8次面对面焦点小组访谈和7次电话一对一访谈(=48)。我们与黑人、多族裔、拉丁裔、美洲原住民和 LGBTQ+ 青少年进行了两次焦点小组访谈。7名LGBTQ+ 青少年参与了电话一对一访谈。焦点小组参与者和访谈对象被问及来自半结构化焦点小组问题指南中的相同11个问题。其中5个问题是关于一般约会行为的主题。此外,还就一份包含75项虐待行为的纸质清单询问了6个关于反应的问题。青少年提出了10个新的可能的网络ADA项目和14个情感虐待项目,以纳入ADA测量工具。他们没有提出任何新的身体或性方面的ADA项目。青少年指出了14项他们认为不应纳入该测量工具的行为,要么是因为这些行为不属于虐待行为且过于常见,要么是因为他们无法理解该项目,要么是因为作为ADA行为似乎不现实。该研究存在一些局限性,是朝着丰富ADA测量工具的文化包容性迈出的良好第一步。持续关注旨在理解不同参与者文化背景的包容性研究,对于暴力预防学术研究以及随后从中衍生出的健康项目和政策至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验