Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, IL.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;13(8):e007726. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007726. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
Clinical factors associated with development of intravascular lead adherence (ILA) are unreliable predictors. Because vascular injury in the superior vena cava-right atrium during transvenous lead extraction is more likely to occur in segments with higher degrees of ILA, reliable and accurate assessment of ILA is warranted. We hypothesized that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) could accurately visualize and quantify ILA and degree of ILA correlates with transvenous lead extraction difficulty.
Serial imaging of leads occurred before transvenous lead extraction using IVUS. ILA areas were classified as high or low grade. Degree of extraction difficulty was assessed using 2 metrics and correlated with ILA grade. Lead extraction difficulty was calculated for each patient and compared with IVUS findings.
One hundred fifty-eight vascular segments in 60 patients were analyzed: 141 (89%) low grade versus 17 (11%) high grade. Median extraction time (low=0 versus high grade=97 seconds, <0.001) and median laser pulsations delivered (low=0 versus high grade=5852, <0.001) were significantly higher in high-grade segments. Most patients with low lead extraction difficulty score had low ILA grades. Eighty-six percentage of patients with high lead extraction difficulty score had low IVUS grade, and the degree of transvenous lead extraction difficulty was similar to patients with low IVUS grades and lead extraction difficulty scores.
IVUS is a feasible imaging modality that may be useful in characterizing ILA in the superior vena cava-right atrium region. An ILA grading system using imaging correlates with extraction difficulty. Most patients with clinical factors associated with higher extraction difficulty may exhibit lower ILA and extraction difficulty based on IVUS imaging. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.
与血管内导线黏附(ILA)发展相关的临床因素是不可靠的预测指标。由于在经静脉导线拔除过程中,上腔静脉-右心房段的血管损伤更可能发生在 ILA 程度较高的节段,因此需要对 ILA 进行可靠和准确的评估。我们假设血管内超声(IVUS)可以准确地可视化和量化 ILA,并且 ILA 程度与经静脉导线拔除难度相关。
在经静脉导线拔除前,使用 IVUS 对导线进行连续成像。将 ILA 区域分为高等级或低等级。使用 2 种指标评估拔除难度,并与 ILA 等级相关联。计算每位患者的导线拔除难度,并与 IVUS 结果进行比较。
对 60 例患者的 158 个血管节段进行了分析:141 个(89%)为低等级,17 个(11%)为高等级。高等级段的中位拔除时间(低等级=0 秒,高等级=97 秒,<0.001)和中位激光脉冲数(低等级=0 次,高等级=5852 次,<0.001)明显较高。大多数低导线拔除难度评分的患者都有低 ILA 等级。86%的高导线拔除难度评分的患者都有低 IVUS 等级,且经静脉导线拔除难度与低 IVUS 等级和导线拔除难度评分的患者相似。
IVUS 是一种可行的成像方式,可用于对上腔静脉-右心房区域的 ILA 进行特征描述。一种使用影像学的 ILA 分级系统与拔除难度相关。大多数具有较高拔除难度临床因素的患者,根据 IVUS 影像学检查,可能表现出较低的 ILA 和拔除难度。