Suppr超能文献

心室按需型起搏器导线拔除——与其他导线的差异及管理中的实用技巧

VDD Lead Extraction-Differences with Other Leads and Practical Tips in Management.

作者信息

Kutarski Andrzej, Jacheć Wojciech, Stefańczyk Paweł, Polewczyk Anna, Kosior Jarosław, Nowosielecka Dorota

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.

2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 30;13(3):800. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030800.

Abstract

VDD (atrial sensing, ventricular sensing/pacing) leads are relatively rarely implanted; therefore, experience in their extraction is very limited. We aimed to investigate whether VDD lead removal may be a risk factor for the increased complexity of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) or major complications. We retrospectively analyzed 3808 TLE procedures (including 103 patients with VDD leads). If TLE included VDD lead removal, procedure duration (lead dilation time) was prolonged, complicated extractions were slightly more common, and more advanced tools were required. This is partly due to longer implant duration (in patients with VDD systems-135.2 months; systems without VDD leads-109.3 months; < 0.001), more frequent presence of abandoned leads (all systems containing VDD leads-22.33% and all systems without VDD leads-10.77%), and partly to the younger age of patients with VDD leads (51.74 vs. 57.72 years; < 0.001, in the remaining patients) at the time of system implantation. VDD lead extraction does not increase the risk of major complications (1.94 vs. 2.34%; = 0.905). The extraction of VDD leads may be considered a risk factor for increased procedure complexity, but not for major complications. However, this is not a direct result of VDD lead extraction but specific characteristics of the patients with VDD leads. Operator skill and team experience combined with special custom maneuvers can enable favorable results to be achieved despite the specific design of VDD leads, even with older VDD lead models.

摘要

VDD(心房感知、心室感知/起搏)导联植入相对较少;因此,其拔除经验非常有限。我们旨在研究VDD导联拔除是否可能是经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)复杂性增加或主要并发症的危险因素。我们回顾性分析了3808例TLE手术(包括103例植入VDD导联的患者)。如果TLE包括VDD导联拔除,手术时间(导线扩张时间)会延长,复杂拔除稍微更常见,并且需要更先进的工具。这部分是由于植入持续时间更长(VDD系统患者为135.2个月;无VDD导联系统患者为109.3个月;<0.001),废弃导线更频繁出现(所有包含VDD导联的系统为22.33%,所有无VDD导联的系统为10.77%),部分还由于植入VDD导联的患者在系统植入时年龄更小(分别为51.74岁和57.72岁;<0.001,其余患者)。VDD导联拔除不会增加主要并发症风险(分别为1.94%和2.34%;P=0.905)。VDD导联拔除可被视为手术复杂性增加的危险因素,但不是主要并发症的危险因素。然而,这并非VDD导联拔除的直接结果,而是VDD导联患者的特定特征所致。尽管VDD导联设计特殊,即使是较旧的VDD导联型号,术者技能和团队经验加上特殊的定制操作仍可取得良好效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d971/10856487/206f9839b369/jcm-13-00800-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验