Suppr超能文献

抗 SARS-CoV-2 感染的氯喹药理学视角:一种老药对抗新型冠状病毒?

A pharmacological perspective of chloroquine in SARS-CoV-2 infection: An old drug for the fight against a new coronavirus?

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru, and Drug Safety Research Center, Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Hospital Almenara, ESSALUD, Lima, Peru.

Discipline of Medical Gerontology, Mercer's Institute for Successful Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, and Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Sep;56(3):106078. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106078. Epub 2020 Jul 4.

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is having serious consequences on health and the economy worldwide. All evidence-based treatment strategies need to be considered to combat this new virus. Drugs need to be considered on scientific grounds of efficacy, safety and cost. Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are old drugs used in the treatment of malaria. Moreover, their antiviral properties have been previously studied, including against coronaviruses, where evidence of efficacy has been found. In the current race against time triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic, the search for new antivirals is very important. However, consideration should be given to old drugs with known anti-coronavirus activity, such as CQ and HCQ. These could be integrated into current treatment strategies while novel treatments are awaited, also in light of the fact that they display an anticoagulant effect that facilitates the activity of low-molecular-weight heparin, aimed at preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-associated thrombotic events. The safety of CQ and HCQ has been studied for over 50 years, however recently published data raise concerns for cardiac toxicity of CQ/HCQ in patients with COVID-19. This review also re-examines the real information provided by some of the published alarming reports, although concluding that cardiac toxicity should in any case be stringently monitored in patients receiving CQ/HCQ.

摘要

由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 引起的 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 大流行正在对全球的健康和经济造成严重后果。所有基于证据的治疗策略都需要考虑以对抗这种新病毒。药物需要根据疗效、安全性和成本的科学依据来考虑。氯喹 (CQ) 和羟氯喹 (HCQ) 是用于治疗疟疾的老药。此外,它们的抗病毒特性以前也有过研究,包括针对冠状病毒,已经发现了它们的疗效证据。在当前由 COVID-19 大流行引发的争分夺秒的竞赛中,寻找新的抗病毒药物非常重要。然而,应该考虑具有已知抗冠状病毒活性的老药物,如 CQ 和 HCQ。这些药物可以在等待新的治疗方法的同时纳入当前的治疗策略,同时考虑到它们具有抗凝作用,有利于低分子量肝素的活性,旨在预防急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS) 相关的血栓事件。CQ 和 HCQ 的安全性已经研究了 50 多年,但最近发表的数据对 COVID-19 患者 CQ/HCQ 的心脏毒性表示担忧。这篇综述还重新审查了一些发表的令人震惊的报告中提供的真实信息,尽管结论是无论如何都应该在接受 CQ/HCQ 治疗的患者中严格监测心脏毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ff1/7334645/661f8382f9b7/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验