• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同种植体设计在非轴向载荷下对应变和应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析。

Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa, 4200-150 Porto, Portugal.

Department of Surgery and Medical-surgical Specialties, University of Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 1;17(13):4738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134738.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17134738
PMID:32630294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7370002/
Abstract

Implant design evolved alongside the development of implant therapy. The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to analyze the influence of different implant designs on the stress and strain distribution to the implants and surrounding bone. Three implant designs with the same length and diameter were used. The three-dimensional geometry of the bone was simulated with a cortical bone of three different thicknesses and two medullar bone densities: low density (150 Hounsfield units) and high density (850 Hounsfield units). A 30° oblique load of 150 N was applied to the implant restoration. Displacement and stress (von Mises) results were obtained for bone and dental implants. The strain and stress distributions to the bone were higher for the tissue-level implant for all types of bone. The maximum principal strain and stress decreased with an increase in cortical bone thickness for both cancellous bone densities. The distribution of the load was concentrated at the coronal portion of the bone and implants. All implants showed a good distribution of forces for non-axial loads, with higher forces concentrated at the crestal region of the bone-implant interface. Decrease in medullar bone density negatively affects the strain and stress produced by the implants.

摘要

种植体设计是伴随着种植体治疗的发展而不断演变的。本有限元分析(FEA)研究的目的是分析不同种植体设计对种植体和周围骨的应力和应变分布的影响。使用了三种长度和直径相同的种植体设计。使用三种不同厚度的皮质骨和两种松质骨密度(低密 150 亨氏单位和高密 850 亨氏单位)模拟了骨的三维几何形状。在种植体修复体上施加了 150N 的 30°斜向载荷。获得了骨和牙种植体的位移和(von Mises)应力结果。对于所有类型的骨,组织水平种植体的骨和种植体的应变和应力分布更高。对于两种松质骨密度,最大主应变和应力随着皮质骨厚度的增加而减小。载荷分布集中在骨和种植体的冠部。所有种植体在承受非轴向载荷时都表现出良好的力分布,在骨-种植体界面的嵴部区域集中了更高的力。骨髓骨密度的降低会对种植体产生的应变和应力产生负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/9d9298b8261c/ijerph-17-04738-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/ec67a2ec8672/ijerph-17-04738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/3156ac4eff74/ijerph-17-04738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/f94ea20c94c2/ijerph-17-04738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/25a37549e227/ijerph-17-04738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/82b4934f26e5/ijerph-17-04738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/c7b0cb14dae7/ijerph-17-04738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/7b64ab503b7e/ijerph-17-04738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/c86a59fca601/ijerph-17-04738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/3e37f83b53ae/ijerph-17-04738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/6a48cbd9ce1b/ijerph-17-04738-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/d76d8a01f024/ijerph-17-04738-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/6d1730ff8f00/ijerph-17-04738-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/95fdd7773460/ijerph-17-04738-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/9d9298b8261c/ijerph-17-04738-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/ec67a2ec8672/ijerph-17-04738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/3156ac4eff74/ijerph-17-04738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/f94ea20c94c2/ijerph-17-04738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/25a37549e227/ijerph-17-04738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/82b4934f26e5/ijerph-17-04738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/c7b0cb14dae7/ijerph-17-04738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/7b64ab503b7e/ijerph-17-04738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/c86a59fca601/ijerph-17-04738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/3e37f83b53ae/ijerph-17-04738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/6a48cbd9ce1b/ijerph-17-04738-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/d76d8a01f024/ijerph-17-04738-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/6d1730ff8f00/ijerph-17-04738-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/95fdd7773460/ijerph-17-04738-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/7370002/9d9298b8261c/ijerph-17-04738-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.不同种植体设计在非轴向载荷下对应变和应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 1;17(13):4738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134738.
2
Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Associated With Different Implant Designs for Different Bone Densities.不同骨密度下不同种植体设计的应力分布有限元分析。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Aug;31(7):614-622. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13539. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
3
[Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].即刻负重种植体生物力学分布的三维有限元分析
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;29(2):121-4.
4
The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体直径和长度对与嵴顶骨几何形状相关的骨结合种植体应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Dec;100(6):422-31. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60259-0.
5
Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.平台转换:使用三维有限元分析的生物力学评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):482-91.
6
Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.三种不同氧化锆牙科种植体的受力评估:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):95-103.
7
Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.平台转换对锥形和圆柱形种植体嵴骨应力影响的评估:有限元分析
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2015 Jan;17(1):2-13.
8
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Osseointegrated Implants Placed in Bone of Different Densities With Cemented Fixed Prosthetic Restoration.采用粘结固定修复体对不同密度骨中植入的骨结合种植体进行三维有限元分析。
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Oct 1;46(5):480-490. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00144.
9
Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.不同直径即刻负重种植体的种植体-骨界面应力分布:三维有限元分析
J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul;18(5):393-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00453.x. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Implant Designs: Influence of Diameter, Length, and Taper on Stress and Strain in the Mandibular Segment-A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.种植体设计的比较评估:直径、长度和锥度对下颌骨段应力和应变的影响——三维有限元分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S347-S354. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_29_19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Implant Macro-geometry in Primary Stability in Low-Density Bone: An Study.种植体宏观几何形状对低密度骨初始稳定性的影响:一项研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2025 Apr 30;15(2):134-143. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_155_24. eCollection 2025 Mar-Apr.
2
Influence of Implant Geometry on the Surface Strain Behavior of Peri-Implant Bone: A 3D Analysis.种植体几何形状对种植体周围骨表面应变行为的影响:三维分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/cid.70003.
3
Finite Element Analysis of Functionally Loaded Subperiosteal Implants Evaluated on a Realistic Model Reproducing Severe Atrophic Jaws.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of extra short implants focusing on implant designs and materials.聚焦种植体设计与材料的超短种植体三维有限元分析
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jan 29;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0202-6.
2
Biological effects of resin monomers on oral cell populations: descriptive analysis of literature.树脂单体对口腔细胞群体的生物学影响:文献描述性分析。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Sep;20(3):224-232. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.03.11.
3
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Endosteal Implants with Different Macro Designs on Stress Distribution in Different Bone Qualities.
在重现严重萎缩性颌骨的真实模型上评估功能负载骨膜下种植体的有限元分析
Methods Protoc. 2025 Jan 18;8(1):8. doi: 10.3390/mps8010008.
4
Application of Ultrashort Implants in Posterior Maxilla With Insufficient Bone Height: A Finite Element Analysis.超短种植体在后牙区骨高度不足的上颌骨中的应用:有限元分析
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun;75(3):2122-2131. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.12.026. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
5
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on different complex macro designs in commercially available implants: An in-vitro study.市售种植体不同复杂宏观设计应力分布的三维有限元分析:一项体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;14(6):761-766. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
6
Design Factors of Ti-Base Abutments Related to the Biomechanics Behavior of Dental Implant Prostheses: Finite Element Analysis and Validation via In Vitro Load Creeping Tests.与牙种植体修复生物力学行为相关的钛基基台设计因素:有限元分析及体外载荷蠕变试验验证
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 29;17(15):3746. doi: 10.3390/ma17153746.
7
Biomechanical Effects of Ti-Base Abutment Height on the Dental Implant System: A Finite Element Analysis.钛基台高度对牙种植体系统的生物力学影响:有限元分析
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Apr 11;15(4):101. doi: 10.3390/jfb15040101.
8
Effect of different implant locations and abutment types on stress and strain distribution under non-axial loading: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.不同种植体位置和基台类型对非轴向加载下应力和应变分布的影响:三维有限元分析
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):607-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
9
Biomechanical Analysis of Axial Gradient Porous Dental Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.轴向梯度多孔牙种植体的生物力学分析:有限元分析
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Nov 23;14(12):557. doi: 10.3390/jfb14120557.
10
Investigating the impact of diameters and thread designs on the Biomechanics of short implants placed in D4 bone: a 3D finite element analysis.研究不同直径和螺纹设计的短种植体在 D4 骨中的生物力学影响:三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03370-8.
不同骨质量内植物不同宏观设计对骨内种植体应力分布影响的三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):e43–e50. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7058. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
4
Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.种植体周围骨的平台转换效应:三维有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jun;121(6):935-940. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.011. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
5
Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.吸收下颌骨中 4 种短种植体的生物力学分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):659-670. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review.部分无牙颌患者种植体的植入和负荷方案:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:106-134. doi: 10.1111/clr.13276.
7
The effect of microthread design on magnitude and distribution of stresses in bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.微螺纹设计对骨应力大小和分布的影响:三维有限元分析。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Sep-Oct;15(5):347-353.
8
Unravelling the effect of macro and microscopic design of dental implants on osseointegration: a randomised clinical study in minipigs.揭示牙种植体宏观和微观设计对骨整合的影响:小型猪的随机临床试验。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018 Jun 26;29(7):99. doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6101-1.
9
Micro finite element analysis of dental implants under different loading conditions.不同加载条件下牙种植体的微有限元分析。
Comput Biol Med. 2018 May 1;96:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
10
Tapered, Double-Lead Threads Single Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Healed Sites of the Posterior Jaws: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial with 1 to 3 Years of Follow-Up.锥形、双螺纹种植体在新鲜拔牙窝和后牙区愈合位点中的应用:一项多中心随机对照研究,随访时间 1 至 3 年。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8017175. doi: 10.1155/2017/8017175. Epub 2017 Sep 13.