• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑卒中后失语症的治疗剂量:系统范围综述。

Treatment dose in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic scoping review.

机构信息

Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Dec;31(10):1629-1660. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1786412. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1080/09602011.2020.1786412
PMID:32631143
Abstract

Little is known about how the amount of treatment a person with aphasia receives impacts aphasia recovery following stroke, yet this information is vital to ensure effective treatments are delivered efficiently. Furthermore, there is no standard dose terminology in the stroke rehabilitation or aphasia literature. This scoping review aims to systematically map the evidence regarding dose in treatments for post-stroke aphasia and to explore how treatment dose is conceptualized, measured and reported in the literature. A comprehensive search was undertaken in June 2019. One hundred and twelve intervention studies were reviewed. Treatment dose (amount of treatment) has been conceptualized as both a measure of time and a count of discrete therapeutic elements. Doses ranged from one to 100 hours, while some studies reported session doses of up to 420 therapeutic inputs per session. Studies employ a wide variety of treatment schedules (i.e., session dose, session frequency, and intervention duration) and the interaction of dose parameters may impact the dose-response relationship. High dose interventions delivered over short periods may improve treatment efficiency while maintaining efficacy. Person- and treatment-level factors that mediate tolerance of high dose interventions require further investigation. Systematic exploration of dose-response relationships in post-stroke aphasia treatment is required.

摘要

关于一个患有失语症的人接受的治疗量如何影响中风后的失语症康复,目前知之甚少,但这些信息对于确保有效治疗的高效实施至关重要。此外,中风康复或失语症文献中没有标准的剂量术语。本范围综述旨在系统地绘制关于中风后失语症治疗中剂量的证据,并探讨文献中如何概念化、测量和报告治疗剂量。在 2019 年 6 月进行了全面检索。综述了 112 项干预研究。治疗剂量(治疗量)既被概念化为时间的度量,也被概念化为离散治疗元素的计数。剂量范围从 1 到 100 小时,而一些研究报告每次治疗高达 420 个治疗输入的治疗剂量。研究采用了各种各样的治疗方案(即治疗剂量、治疗频率和干预持续时间),剂量参数的相互作用可能会影响剂量反应关系。在短时间内给予高剂量的干预措施可能会提高治疗效率,同时保持疗效。需要进一步研究介导高剂量干预耐受性的个体和治疗水平因素。需要系统地探索中风后失语症治疗中的剂量反应关系。

相似文献

1
Treatment dose in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic scoping review.脑卒中后失语症的治疗剂量:系统范围综述。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Dec;31(10):1629-1660. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1786412. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
Dose effects in behavioural treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.剂量效应对脑卒中后失语症行为治疗的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2548-2559. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1843079. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
3
Efficacy of reading strategies on text-level reading comprehension in people with post-stroke chronic aphasia: A repeated measures study.阅读策略对脑卒中后慢性失语症患者文本层面阅读理解的疗效:一项重复测量研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1066-1089. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12983. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Examining Dose Frameworks to Improve Aphasia Rehabilitation Research.检查剂量框架以改善失语症康复研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 May;104(5):830-838. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
5
An exploration of aphasia therapy dosage in the first six months of stroke recovery.对中风康复头六个月失语症疗法剂量的探索。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Sep;31(8):1254-1288. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1776135. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
6
Does aphasia impact on return to driving after stroke? A scoping review.失语症对中风后恢复驾驶能力有影响吗?一项范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Dec;46(25):5977-6000. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2317989. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
7
A systematic review of rehabilitation interventions to prevent and treat depression in post-stroke aphasia.一项关于预防和治疗中风后失语症患者抑郁症的康复干预措施的系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Aug;40(16):1870-1892. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1315181. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review.非侵入性脑刺激在治疗中风后失语症中的应用:范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Aug;46(17):3802-3826. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
9
What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK?在英国,社区居住的失语症脑卒中幸存者接受了哪些言语和语言治疗?
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0200096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200096. eCollection 2018.
10
Statistical analysis plan for the COMPARE trial: a 3-arm randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of Constraint-induced Aphasia Therapy Plus and Multi-modality Aphasia Therapy to usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia (COMPARE).COMPARE 试验的统计分析计划:一项 3 臂随机对照试验,比较强制性诱导语言疗法加多模态语言疗法与常规护理治疗慢性卒中后失语症的效果(COMPARE)。
Trials. 2021 Apr 23;22(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05238-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of different types of transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke aphasia patients: a network meta-analysis.不同类型经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后失语症患者的疗效:一项网状Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1597504. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1597504. eCollection 2025.
2
Co-Designed Digital Device for Tracking Rehabilitation Dosage in a Clinical Environment After Stroke: Mixed Methods Validity and Feasibility Study.共同设计的用于中风后临床环境中跟踪康复剂量的数字设备:混合方法效度和可行性研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 May 14;12:e68129. doi: 10.2196/68129.
3
Comprehensive quality assessment for aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: protocol for a multicentre, mixed-methods study.
全面质量评估脑卒中后失语症康复:一项多中心混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 21;14(3):e080532. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080532.
4
Clinical outcomes associated with speech, language and swallowing difficulties post-stroke.卒中后言语、语言和吞咽困难的临床转归。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2023 Oct 10;70(1):e1-e15. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v70i1.957.
5
Consistent long-term practice leads to consistent improvement: Benefits of self-managed therapy for language and cognitive deficits using a digital therapeutic.长期坚持练习会带来持续的进步:使用数字疗法进行自我管理治疗对语言和认知缺陷的益处。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Apr 11;5:1095110. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1095110. eCollection 2023.
6
Dosage Frequency Effects on Treatment Outcomes Following Self-managed Digital Therapy: Retrospective Cohort Study.自我管理数字疗法治疗后的剂量频率对治疗结果的影响:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 20;24(7):e36135. doi: 10.2196/36135.
7
A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.一项比较针对命名障碍的分组治疗与随机治疗的随机交叉单病例系列研究。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2023 Jun;33(5):821-848. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2050411. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Is There a Research-Practice Dosage Gap in Aphasia Rehabilitation?在失语症康复中是否存在研究与实践的剂量差距?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Sep 23;30(5):2115-2129. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00257. Epub 2021 Aug 19.