• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

完善客观结构化临床考试中学生表现的全貌:一项关于整合标准化患者评定的混合方法研究。

Completing the picture on student performances in OSCEs: A mixed-methods study on integration of a standardized patient rating.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Health Professions, University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.026
PMID:32631649
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Good physician communication skills increase patient satisfaction and improve healing processes. Although physicians and patients appear to value communicative competencies differently, students are often evaluated solely by physicians. This study examines whether additional assessment of students by 'standardized patients' (SPs) is useful.

METHODS

During their Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) 238 medical students were additionally rated by SPs at 9 stations according to two items that defined the 'physician-patient relationship' and 'communication'. SPs were informed that their assessment was for research purposes only, with no impact on the assessment of the students. SPs also had the opportunity to comment on their rating of the students.

RESULTS

The SPs rated the communicative competencies of students differently than physicians. The two parts of the SP rating are closely related. Inclusion of SP rating in the OSCE would provide higher measurement precision, with more students failing. SPs considered five factors relevant in their rating: 'human connection', 'information flow', 'professionalism', 'competence', and 'exam situation'.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests inclusion of SP rating as additional assessment of student communication skills.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Addition of SP rating in assessments is worthwhile, as it appears to complete the picture of the student performance in their OSCEs.

摘要

目的

良好的医患沟通技巧能提高患者满意度并改善治疗效果。尽管医患双方对沟通能力的重视程度似乎有所不同,但学生的评估往往仅由医生进行。本研究旨在探讨是否可以通过“标准化患者”(SP)对学生进行额外评估。

方法

在他们的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中,238 名医学生在 9 个站点根据两个定义“医患关系”和“沟通”的项目接受 SP 的额外评估。告知 SP 他们的评估仅供研究之用,不会影响对学生的评估。SP 还有机会对他们对学生的评分发表评论。

结果

SP 对学生沟通能力的评估与医生不同。SP 评估的两个部分密切相关。在 OSCE 中纳入 SP 评分将提供更高的测量精度,使更多学生不及格。SP 在其评分中考虑了五个因素:“人际交往”、“信息流”、“专业性”、“能力”和“考试情况”。

结论

我们的研究表明,应将 SP 评分纳入学生沟通技巧的额外评估。

实践意义

增加 SP 评分作为评估的补充是值得的,因为它似乎可以更全面地了解学生在 OSCE 中的表现。

相似文献

1
Completing the picture on student performances in OSCEs: A mixed-methods study on integration of a standardized patient rating.完善客观结构化临床考试中学生表现的全貌:一项关于整合标准化患者评定的混合方法研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Comparison of self and simulated patient assessments of first-year medical students' Interpersonal and Communication Skills (ICS) during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE).在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)期间,对一年级医学生人际沟通技能(ICS)的自我评估与模拟患者评估的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02540-y.
3
Evaluating Medical Spanish Proficiency: A Comparison of Physician Assistant Student Self-Assessment to Standardized Patient and Expert Faculty Member Ratings.评估医学西班牙语水平:医师助理学生自我评估与标准化病人及专家教师评分的比较
J Physician Assist Educ. 2018 Sep;29(3):162-166. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000211.
4
Accuracy of portrayal by standardized patients: results from four OSCE stations conducted for high stakes examinations.标准化患者的描绘准确性:在四项高风险考试中进行的 OSCE 站的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 May 19;14:97. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-97.
5
The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills.使用虚拟患者来教授医学生病史采集和沟通技巧。
Am J Surg. 2006 Jun;191(6):806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.03.002.
6
Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?医学生对虚拟病人会做出共情反应吗?
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.021.
7
Do Standardized Patients Have Concerns About Students Not Captured by Traditional Assessment Forms?标准化病人是否对传统评估表未涵盖的学生问题有所担忧?
Teach Learn Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):395-405. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1176573. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
Comparison of Resident Self-Evaluation to Standardized Patient Evaluators in a Multi-Institutional Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Objectively Measuring Residents' Communication and Counseling Skills.多机构客观结构化临床考试中住院医师自我评价与标准化患者评估者的比较:客观测量住院医师的沟通和咨询技能。
Simul Healthc. 2020 Apr;15(2):69-74. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000404.
9
Communication skills of medical students: survey of self- and external perception in a longitudinally based trend study.医学生的沟通技巧:一项基于纵向趋势研究的自我和外部感知调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 11;20(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02049-w.
10
Assessing medical students' communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients' quality assurance.通过使用标准化病人评估医学生的沟通技巧:强调标准化病人的质量保证。
Acad Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;38(3):354-60. doi: 10.1007/s40596-014-0066-2. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Intelligent virtual case learning system based on real medical records and natural language processing.基于真实病历和自然语言处理的智能虚拟病例学习系统。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 4;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01797-7.