• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较不同剂量超顺磁性氧化铁示踪剂用于乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的随机研究:SUNRISE 研究。

A randomized study comparing different doses of superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: The SUNRISE study.

机构信息

Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain; Universidad de Navarra, Spain.

Breast Center, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;46(12):2195-2201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.018
PMID:32631710
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The non-radioactive method that uses the magnetic tracer (SPIO/Sienna) has shown to be a feasible technique for the SLN detection in breast cancer patients. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of different doses of a new magnetic tracer Sienna XP (Magtrace) compared to Tc-99 m and to evaluate its non-inferiority.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer cT1-3 N0, from October 2016 to August 2018 were eligible and consecutively randomized to three different doses of new SPIO used: group 1 (1 mL), group 2 (1.5 mL) and group 3 (2 mL).

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were included in the study, 45 in each group. Detection of SLNs with the three doses of Sienna XP (1 mL, 1.5 mL and 2 mL) showed non-inferior rates compared to the conventional technique with radiotracer (p = 0.654). Concordance by patients with SLN positive was 100% for all groups. 83 (70.3%) patients reported skin staining at one month postoperatively, significantly lower in group 1 (p = 0.042). At 6 months follow up, group 1 remains with significantly lower skin discoloration (p = 0,01). In multivariate analysis, dose of 2 mL showed statistically significant for the skin staining. The majority of patients (70%) felt that skin discoloration does not represent a problem.

CONCLUSION

The use of the Sienna XP magnetic tracer at 1 mL is not inferior to higher doses of magnetic tracer neither is inferior to radiotracer. 1 mL of magnetic tracer resulted in significantly less skin discoloration compared to higher doses.

摘要

简介

使用磁性示踪剂(SPIO/Sienna)的非放射性方法已被证明是一种可行的技术,可用于检测乳腺癌患者的前哨淋巴结。本研究的目的是评估新型磁性示踪剂 Sienna XP(Magtrace)的不同剂量与 Tc-99 m 相比的功效,并评估其非劣效性。

方法

2016 年 10 月至 2018 年 8 月,符合条件的患者为经组织学证实的早期乳腺癌 cT1-3 N0,连续随机分为三组,分别使用三种不同剂量的新型 SPIO:组 1(1 mL)、组 2(1.5 mL)和组 3(2 mL)。

结果

共有 135 例患者纳入研究,每组 45 例。与放射性示踪剂相比,使用三种剂量的 Sienna XP(1 mL、1.5 mL 和 2 mL)检测 SLN 均显示非劣效率(p = 0.654)。所有组中,SLN 阳性患者的一致性为 100%。83 例(70.3%)患者在术后一个月报告皮肤染色,组 1 显著降低(p = 0.042)。在 6 个月的随访中,组 1 的皮肤变色仍显著较低(p = 0.01)。多变量分析显示,2 mL 剂量与皮肤染色具有统计学意义。大多数患者(70%)认为皮肤变色不是问题。

结论

与较高剂量的磁性示踪剂相比,使用 1 mL 的 Sienna XP 磁性示踪剂不劣于较高剂量的磁性示踪剂,也不劣于放射性示踪剂。与较高剂量相比,1 mL 的磁性示踪剂导致皮肤变色明显减少。

相似文献

1
A randomized study comparing different doses of superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: The SUNRISE study.一项比较不同剂量超顺磁性氧化铁示踪剂用于乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的随机研究:SUNRISE 研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;46(12):2195-2201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
The superparamagnetic iron oxide is equivalent to the Tc99 radiotracer method for identifying the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.超顺磁性氧化铁等同于 Tc99 放射性示踪剂方法,可用于乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的识别。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
3
SentimagIC: A Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Versus Technetium-99m and Blue Dye in the Detection of Axillary Sentinel Nodes in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.SentimagIC 试验:比较超顺磁性氧化铁与锝 99m 和蓝染料在检测早期乳腺癌患者腋窝前哨淋巴结中的非劣效性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3510-3516. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07577-4. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Axillary sentinel lymph node identification using superparamagnetic iron oxide versus radioisotope in early stage breast cancer: The UK SentiMag trial (SMART study).超顺磁性氧化铁与放射性同位素用于早期乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结识别:英国SentiMag试验(SMART研究)
Surgeon. 2023 Apr;21(2):128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 9.
5
The Central-European SentiMag study: sentinel lymph node biopsy with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) vs. radioisotope.中欧SentiMag研究:超顺磁性氧化铁(SPIO)与放射性同位素在前哨淋巴结活检中的应用对比
Breast. 2014 Apr;23(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
6
Partial axillary lymph node dissection inferior to the intercostobrachial nerves complements sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer.在临床腋窝淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者中,在肋间臂神经下方进行部分腋窝淋巴结清扫可补充前哨淋巴结活检。
BMC Surg. 2015 Jun 30;15:79. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0067-4.
7
Near Infrared Fluorescent Lymph Node Mapping with Indocyanine Green in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Trial.近红外荧光吲哚菁绿在乳腺癌患者淋巴结示踪中的前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):672-678. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Use of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) Versus Conventional Technique in Sentinel Lymph Node Detection for Breast Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Trial.超顺磁性氧化铁(SPIO)与常规技术在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结检测中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;30(6):3237-3244. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13252-6. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
9
[Comparison of sentinel lymph node detection by methylene blue and carbon nanoparticle suspension injection in early breast cancer].[亚甲蓝与碳纳米颗粒混悬液注射法检测早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Mar;33(3):226-8.
10
Avoiding unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy with the use of superparamagnetic iron oxide mapping agents (Magtrace®) in breast surgery.在乳腺手术中使用超顺磁性氧化铁造影剂(Magtrace®)避免不必要的前哨淋巴结活检。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Jun;94(6):1090-1095. doi: 10.1111/ans.18936. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnetic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer Patients: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Tracer Uptake.早期乳腺癌患者的磁性前哨淋巴结活检:示踪剂摄取的个体患者数据荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2079-2091. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16626-6. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
Recent trends in preparation and biomedical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles.近期氧化铁纳米粒子的制备及生物医学应用的发展趋势。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2024 Jan 8;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12951-023-02235-0.
3
Ultra-Low Dose of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Patients with Breast Cancer.
超小剂量超顺磁性氧化铁纳米颗粒在乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结检测中的应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5685-5689. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13722-x. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Evolution and refinement of magnetically guided sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: meta-analysis.乳腺癌中磁引导前哨淋巴结检测的演变和改进:荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2023 Mar 30;110(4):410-419. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac426.
5
The Application of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.磁性纳米颗粒在临床淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结检测中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 14;14(20):5034. doi: 10.3390/cancers14205034.
6
Exploratory Study of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Dose Optimization in Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Using a Handheld Magnetic Probe and Iron Quantitation.使用手持式磁探针和铁定量技术对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结识别中超顺磁性氧化铁剂量优化的探索性研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;14(6):1409. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061409.
7
Emerging Application of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer.磁性纳米粒子在癌症诊断与治疗中的新兴应用
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Nov 27;13(23):4146. doi: 10.3390/polym13234146.
8
Optimization of SPIO Injection for Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in a Rat Model.大鼠模型中用于前哨淋巴结清扫的超顺磁性氧化铁注射优化
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 8;13(19):5031. doi: 10.3390/cancers13195031.
9
Optimizing Dose and Timing in Magnetic Tracer Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Early Breast Cancers: The Prospective Multicenter SentiDose Trial.优化早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结检测磁示踪技术的剂量和时机:前瞻性多中心SentiDose试验
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;13(4):693. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040693.
10
Re-evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma.黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检的再评估。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021 Feb 9;22(3):22. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00819-2.