Department of Vascular Surgery, Institute of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Institute of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Sep;60(3):347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.04.042. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of open surgery (OS) and endovascular surgery (ES) for extracranial carotid aneurysm (ECCA) in the authors' centre.
Fifty-seven consecutive patients who were diagnosed with ECCA and underwent intervention from January 2005 to July 2019 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, were reviewed retrospectively. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for OS and ES were analysed. ECCAs were divided into three morphological subgroups: subgroup Ⅰ, no severe tortuosity of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or common carotid artery (CCA) proximal to the aneurysm, tortuosity of the aneurysm and 1 cm of peri-aneurysmal carotid artery ≤ 90°; subgroup Ⅱ, severe ICA or CCA tortuosity proximal to the aneurysm, tortuosity of the aneurysm and 1 cm of peri-aneurysmal carotid artery ≤ 90°; subgroup Ⅲ, aneurysm tortuosity and 1 cm peri-aneurysmal carotid artery > 90°.
35 patients underwent OS, 20 patients underwent ES and 2 patients underwent OS after the failure of ES. Thirty-six cases were classified in subgroup Ⅰ, 11 cases in subgroup Ⅱ, and 10 cases in subgroup Ⅲ. ES was achieved successfully in all 18 cases of subgroup I, but failed in three of four cases in subgroups Ⅱ and Ⅲ. With a mean duration of 62.9 ± 44.5 months of follow up, five deaths were recorded in the OS group, two of which were caused by ipsilateral stroke and three were not neurologically related. There was no stroke or death in the ES group during follow up. One case of stroke and two cases of death occurred in symptomatic patients, while one case of stroke and three cases of death occurred in asymptomatic patients.
This series demonstrates that ES may be a safe and durable option for ECCA in subgroup Ⅰ, while in subgroups Ⅱ and Ⅲ, ES alone may be difficult to apply. A 30 day stroke rate around 5% existed in ECCAs with interventions, which should be considered before the intervention.
本研究旨在评估作者所在中心对颅外颈动脉动脉瘤(ECCA)进行开放手术(OS)和血管内手术(ES)的治疗效果。
回顾性分析 2005 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月复旦大学附属中山医院收治的 57 例 ECCA 患者的临床资料。分析 OS 和 ES 患者的临床特征和手术结果。ECCAs 分为三组形态学亚组:亚组Ⅰ,动脉瘤近端颈内动脉(ICA)或颈总动脉(CCA)无严重迂曲,动脉瘤和 1cm 瘤周颈动脉迂曲角度≤90°;亚组Ⅱ,动脉瘤近端 ICA 或 CCA 严重迂曲,动脉瘤和 1cm 瘤周颈动脉迂曲角度≤90°;亚组Ⅲ,动脉瘤迂曲和 1cm 瘤周颈动脉>90°。
35 例行 OS,20 例行 ES,2 例 ES 失败后改行 OS。36 例患者归入亚组Ⅰ,11 例归入亚组Ⅱ,10 例归入亚组Ⅲ。18 例亚组Ⅰ患者 ES 治疗均成功,4 例亚组Ⅱ和 3 例亚组Ⅲ患者 ES 治疗失败。中位随访时间为 62.9±44.5 个月,OS 组有 5 例死亡,其中 2 例为同侧卒中,3 例与神经无关。ES 组随访期间无卒中或死亡。症状性患者中有 1 例卒中、2 例死亡,无症状性患者中有 1 例卒中、3 例死亡。
本研究表明,对于亚组Ⅰ的 ECCA,ES 可能是一种安全且持久的选择,而对于亚组Ⅱ和Ⅲ,单独使用 ES 可能难以实施。ECCA 介入治疗后 30 天卒中发生率约为 5%,介入治疗前应考虑到这一风险。