Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseaseas, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 6;11(1):3436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17317-y.
The world is entering a new era of the COVID-19 pandemic in which there is an increasing call for reliable antibody testing. To support decision making on the deployment of serology for either population screening or diagnostics, we present a detailed comparison of serological COVID-19 assays. We show that among the selected assays there is a wide diversity in assay performance in different scenarios and when correlated to virus neutralizing antibodies. The Wantai ELISA detecting total immunoglobulins against the receptor binding domain of SARS CoV-2, has the best overall characteristics to detect functional antibodies in different stages and severity of disease, including the potential to set a cut-off indicating the presence of protective antibodies. The large variety of available serological assays requires proper assay validation before deciding on deployment of assays for specific applications.
世界正在进入 COVID-19 大流行的新时代,人们越来越呼吁进行可靠的抗体检测。为了支持基于血清学检测进行人群筛查或诊断的决策,我们详细比较了各种血清学 COVID-19 检测方法。我们发现,在所选择的检测方法中,在不同场景下以及与病毒中和抗体相关联时,检测方法的性能存在很大差异。检测针对 SARS CoV-2 受体结合域的总免疫球蛋白的万泰 ELISA 法,在检测不同疾病阶段和严重程度的功能性抗体方面具有最佳的整体特征,包括设定一个能够表明存在保护性抗体的截断值的潜力。目前有多种血清学检测方法,在决定将这些检测方法用于特定应用之前,需要对其进行适当的检测验证。