Suppr超能文献

盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的疗效:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for central serous chorioretinopathy: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Bilei, Chou Yuyu, Zhao Xinyu, Yang Jingyuan, Chen Youxin

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.

Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.9 Dongdansantiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;40(11):2957-2967. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01479-1. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) for patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched up to February 2020, to identify the studies comparing the efficacy of MRA with placebo/observation or photodynamic therapy (PDT) for CSCR. The primary outcomes were maximal subretinal fluid height and central macular thickness (CMT). The secondary outcomes included subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data of interest were extracted and analyzed by R version 3.6.0. The weighted mean difference and their 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the strength of the association.

RESULTS

Ten studies including 284 affected eyes were involved, with 168 undergoing MRA treatment, 60 taking placebo/observation, and 56 receiving PDT. The pooling results showed that MRA was significantly more effective in resolving maximal subretinal fluid height (P < 0.01) and diminishing CMT (P < 0.01) than placebo/observation, while PDT could achieve significantly better CMT reduction than MRA (P = 0.03). For BCVA improvement and SFCT reduction, no statistical difference was detected among the groups of MRA, observation, placebo, or PDT (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MRA is an effective therapy for the management of CSCR, which is only slightly inferior to PDT in terms of CMT reduction. For patients who could not afford PDT, MRA could function as an alternative treatment with acceptable efficacy and safety.

摘要

目的

评估盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)对中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)患者的疗效。

方法

全面检索截至2020年2月的Pubmed、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,以确定比较MRA与安慰剂/观察或光动力疗法(PDT)治疗CSCR疗效的研究。主要结局为最大视网膜下液高度和中心黄斑厚度(CMT)。次要结局包括黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。提取感兴趣的数据并使用R 3.6.0版本进行分析。加权平均差及其95%置信区间用于评估关联强度。

结果

纳入10项研究,共284只患眼,其中168只接受MRA治疗,60只接受安慰剂/观察,56只接受PDT治疗。汇总结果显示,与安慰剂/观察相比,MRA在解决最大视网膜下液高度(P < 0.01)和降低CMT(P < 0.01)方面显著更有效,而PDT在降低CMT方面比MRA显著更好(P = 0.03)。对于BCVA改善和SFCT降低,MRA、观察、安慰剂或PDT组之间未检测到统计学差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

MRA是治疗CSCR的有效疗法,在降低CMT方面仅略逊于PDT。对于无法负担PDT的患者,MRA可作为一种疗效和安全性可接受的替代治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验