Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

TOPIC

A meta-analysis comparing mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (eplerenone or spironolactone) versus observation or placebo in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and subretinal fluid (SRF) level data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Central serous chorioretinopathy patients may demonstrate decreased visual acuity, reduced contrast sensitivity, scotomas, and metamorphopsia. Although multiple treatment options for CSCR have been proposed, compelling evidence for any particular method is still lacking.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and BIOSIS) were searched for potentially relevant records as of March 2018. Of 114 unique studies identified, 5 RCTs comparing BCVA with either eplerenone or spironolactone versus observation or placebo were included. The quality of articles was assessed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, with any discrepancies resolved by author consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 145 eyes of patients with CSCR were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo or observation, MR antagonist treatment showed a significant positive effect on BCVA after both 1 month (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to -0.02 logMAR; Z = 3.94; P < 0.0001) and 2 months (WMD, -0.10 logMAR; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.06 logMAR; Z = 4.69; P < 0.00001). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment also significantly reduced SRF height in CSCR at 1 month (WMD, -81.15 μm; 95% CI, -148.25 to -14.05 μm; Z = 2.37; P = 0.02). However, this effect was no longer significant at 2 months (WMD, -58.63 μm; 95% CI, -155.40 to 38.13 μm; Z = 1.19; P = 0.23). None of the patients in the 5 trials withdrew because of adverse effects, and blood electrolyte levels, including potassium, remained normal in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a modest benefit with MR antagonist therapy for CSCR patients in improving BCVA. We anticipate that MR antagonists will be well tolerated by most CSCR patients and that barriers to starting a trial of these medications in nonresolving CSCR should be low.