• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AOSpine CROST(临床报告的脊柱创伤结局)的制定与信度:一种从临床医生角度评估和预测结局的工具。

Development and reliability of the AOSpine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma): a tool to evaluate and predict outcomes from clinician's perspective.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, HP G05.228, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2020 Oct;29(10):2550-2559. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06518-0. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-020-06518-0
PMID:32632640
Abstract

PURPOSE

To report on the development of AOSpine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) and results of an initial reliability study.

METHODS

The AOSpine CROST was developed using an iterative approach of multiple cycles of development, review, and revision including an expert clinician panel. Subsequently, a reliability study was performed among an expert panel who were provided with 20 spine trauma cases, administered twice with 4-week interval. The results of the developmental process were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the reliability per parameter using Kappa statistics, inter-rater rater agreement using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and internal consistency using Cronbach's α.

RESULTS

The AOSpine CROST was developed and consisted of 10 parameters, 2 of which are only applicable for surgically treated patents ('Wound healing' and 'Implants'). A dichotomous scoring system ('yes' or 'no' response) was incorporated to express expected problems for the short term and long term. In the reliability study, 16 (84.2%) participated in the first round and 14 (73.7%) in the second. Intra-rater reliability was fair to good for both time points (κ = 0.40-0.80 and κ = 0.31-0.67). Results of inter-rater reliability were lower (κ = 0.18-0.60 and κ = 0.16-0.46). Inter-rater agreement for total scores showed moderate results (ICC = 0.52-0.60), and the internal consistency was acceptable (α = 0.76-0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The AOSpine CROST, an outcome tool for the surgeons, was developed using an iterative process. An initial reliability analysis showed fair to moderate results and acceptable internal consistency. Further clinical validation studies will be performed to further validate the tool.

摘要

目的

报告 AOSpine CROST(临床医生报告的脊柱创伤结果)的制定过程和初步可靠性研究的结果。

方法

AOSpine CROST 是通过多次开发、审查和修订周期的迭代方法制定的,包括一个专家临床医生小组。随后,对一个专家小组进行了可靠性研究,他们提供了 20 例脊柱创伤病例,每 4 周进行两次测试。使用描述性统计、每个参数的 Kappa 统计、组内相关系数(ICC)的组间评分者一致性和 Cronbach's α 的内部一致性来分析发展过程的结果。

结果

AOSpine CROST 已开发完成,包括 10 个参数,其中 2 个仅适用于手术治疗患者(“伤口愈合”和“植入物”)。采用二分制评分系统(“是”或“否”响应)来表示短期和长期的预期问题。在可靠性研究中,16 名(84.2%)参加了第一轮,14 名(73.7%)参加了第二轮。两轮的组内评分者可靠性均为中等至良好(κ=0.40-0.80 和 κ=0.31-0.67)。组间评分者可靠性结果较低(κ=0.18-0.60 和 κ=0.16-0.46)。总评分的组间评分者一致性显示为中等结果(ICC=0.52-0.60),内部一致性可接受(α=0.76-0.82)。

结论

AOSpine CROST 是一种针对外科医生的结果工具,它是使用迭代过程开发的。初步可靠性分析显示出中等至良好的结果和可接受的内部一致性。将进一步进行临床验证研究,以进一步验证该工具。

相似文献

1
Development and reliability of the AOSpine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma): a tool to evaluate and predict outcomes from clinician's perspective.AOSpine CROST(临床报告的脊柱创伤结局)的制定与信度:一种从临床医生角度评估和预测结局的工具。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Oct;29(10):2550-2559. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06518-0. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting.验证 AO 脊柱 CROST(临床报告的脊柱创伤结果)在临床环境中的应用。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Apr;33(4):1607-1616. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08145-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
3
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma).荷兰版 AOSpine PROST(患者报告的脊柱创伤结果)的可靠性、有效性和反应性。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Sep;30(9):2631-2644. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06554-w. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Reliability and Validity of the English Version of the AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma).《AOSpine PROST(脊柱创伤患者报告结局)英文版的信度和效度》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 1;45(17):E1111-E1118. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003514.
5
The Need of Validated Disease-Specific Outcome Instruments for Spine Trauma.脊柱创伤中对经过验证的疾病特异性结局指标的需求
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Sep;31 Suppl 4:S33-S37. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000945.
6
Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons.中国脊柱外科医生对AOSpine胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的可靠性和可重复性分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 May;26(5):1477-1482. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4842-4. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeons.由全球一组经验不足的脊柱外科医生对AOSpine胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统进行的可靠性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr;25(4):1082-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3765-9. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
8
Reliability assessment of AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system and Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) for thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a multicentre study.AOSpine胸腰椎损伤分类系统和胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)对胸腰椎损伤的可靠性评估:一项多中心研究的结果
Eur Spine J. 2017 May;26(5):1470-1476. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4663-5. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
A comparative agreement evaluation of two subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems: the AOSpine and the Allen and Ferguson schemes.两种下颈椎损伤分类系统的比较一致性评估:AOSpine系统和艾伦与弗格森方案。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2185-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4498-0. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
10
Inter- and intra-observer agreement using the new AOSpine sacral fracture classification, with a comparison between spine and pelvic trauma surgeons.新的 AOSpine 骶骨骨折分类的观察者间和观察者内一致性,以及脊柱和骨盆创伤外科医生之间的比较。
Injury. 2022 Feb;53(2):514-518. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.041. Epub 2021 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting.验证 AO 脊柱 CROST(临床报告的脊柱创伤结果)在临床环境中的应用。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Apr;33(4):1607-1616. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08145-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
2
Health professionals' perspective on the applicability of AO Spine PROST (patient reported outcome Spine trauma) in people with a motor-complete traumatic or non-traumatic spinal cord injury.健康专业人员对 AO Spine PROST(脊柱创伤患者报告结局)在运动完全性创伤性或非创伤性脊髓损伤患者中的适用性的看法。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):2120-2130. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07676-7. Epub 2023 Apr 8.