Otón Teresa, Sastre Carlos, Carmona Loreto
InMusc, Madrid, Spain.
Novartis Farmacéutica SA, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Feb;40(2):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05269-z. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
Explore the perspective of patients and professionals regarding non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and to define the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment in order to identify unmet needs during the process.
A qualitative study was carried out in two phases. In the first part, five focus groups were held with rheumatologists, orthopaedist, physiotherapists, primary care physicians (PCP), radiologists and six narrative interviews with nr-axSpA patients. In the second part, a nominal group meeting was held to detect which needs were not covered in the nr-axSpA (all of whom had collaborated in the previous phase).
The topics discussed with professional groups and patients were the appropriateness of the term and concept of nr-axSpA, the management of low back pain and inflammatory back pain in routine clinical practice, complementary test and the problem of waiting lists and finally the unmet needs both from a practitioner's and a patient's perspective. The final group explored solutions to the problems based on what was discussed in the first part of the project. Some of these solutions were strengthening relations between specialties, implementing high resolution consultations, rethinking the disability scales, offering better information to patients, designing resource maps and using different strategies to promote knowledge of the disease.
Many different perspectives on the same disease have revealed the difficult journey of the patient with suspected nr-axSpA, while identifying problems and solutions. Key Points • Diagnosis of nr-AxSpA among health professionals outside rheumatology may lead to numerous turns and difficulties in the patient's journey. • The impact of delays and complications in the journey to diagnosis is not quantified but directly affects the state of well-being and health of patients. • Multidisciplinary care is far from a reality. Primary care (key specialists in any chronic condition), radiologists, orthopaedists, and non-physicians such as physiotherapists and psychologists are generally excluded from dealing with these patients, and often have to do their work outside of physicians, rather than working together in a truly patient-centred medicine.
探讨患者和专业人员对非放射学中轴型脊柱关节炎(nr-axSpA)的看法,并确定患者从诊断到治疗的过程,以便识别该过程中未满足的需求。
进行了一项分两个阶段的定性研究。第一部分,与风湿病学家、骨科医生、物理治疗师、初级保健医生(PCP)、放射科医生举行了五次焦点小组会议,并对nr-axSpA患者进行了六次叙述性访谈。第二部分,举行了一次名义小组会议,以发现nr-axSpA中未涵盖的需求(所有这些人都参与了前一阶段的合作)。
与专业团体和患者讨论的主题包括nr-axSpA术语和概念的恰当性、常规临床实践中腰痛和炎性背痛的管理、辅助检查以及等候名单问题,最后是从从业者和患者角度来看未满足的需求。最后一组根据项目第一部分讨论的内容探索了解决问题的方法。其中一些解决方案包括加强专科之间的关系、开展高分辨率咨询、重新思考残疾量表、向患者提供更好的信息、设计资源地图以及采用不同策略来促进对该疾病的了解。
对同一疾病的许多不同观点揭示了疑似nr-axSpA患者的艰难历程,同时也识别了问题和解决方案。要点• 风湿病学以外的卫生专业人员对nr-AxSpA的诊断可能会导致患者就医过程中出现诸多波折和困难。• 诊断过程中的延误和并发症的影响虽未量化,但直接影响患者的幸福和健康状况。• 多学科护理远未成为现实。初级保健(任何慢性病的关键专科)、放射科医生、骨科医生以及物理治疗师和心理学家等非医生通常被排除在这些患者的治疗之外,而且往往不得不在医生之外开展工作,而不是以真正以患者为中心的医学方式共同协作。