Wake Forest Organoid Research Center (WFORCE), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;27(13):4950-4960. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08790-2. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
Chemotherapy dosing duration and perfusion temperature vary significantly in HIPEC protocols. This study investigates patient-derived tumor organoids as a platform to identify the most efficacious perfusion protocol in a personalized approach.
Peritoneal tumor tissue from 15 appendiceal and 8 colon cancer patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC were used for personalized organoid development. Organoids were perfused in parallel at 37 and 42 °C with low- and high-dose oxaliplatin (200 mg/m over 2 h vs. 460 mg/m over 30 min) and MMC (40 mg/3L over 2 h). Viability assays were performed and pooled for statistical analysis.
An adequate organoid number was generated for 75% (6/8) of colon and 73% (11/15) of appendiceal patients. All 42 °C treatments displayed lower viability than 37 °C treatments. On pooled analysis, MMC and 200 mg/m oxaliplatin displayed no treatment difference for either appendiceal or colon organoids (19% vs. 25%, p = 0.22 and 27% vs. 31%, p = 0.55, respectively), whereas heated MMC was superior to 460 mg/m oxaliplatin in both primaries (19% vs. 54%, p < 0.001 and 27% vs. 53%, p = 0.002, respectively). In both appendiceal and colon tumor organoids, heated 200 mg/m oxaliplatin displayed increased cytotoxicity as compared with 460 mg/m oxaliplatin (25% vs. 54%, p < 0.001 and 31% vs. 53%, p = 0.008, respectively).
Organoids treated with MMC or 200 mg/m heated oxaliplatin for 2 h displayed increased susceptibility in comparison with 30-min 460 mg/m oxaliplatin. Optimal perfusion protocol varies among patients, and organoid technology may offer a platform for tailoring HIPEC conditions to the individual patient level.
腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)方案中的化疗持续时间和灌注温度差异很大。本研究旨在探讨患者来源的肿瘤类器官作为平台,以确定在个体化方法中最有效的灌注方案。
对 15 例阑尾和 8 例结肠癌患者的腹膜肿瘤组织进行了研究,这些患者接受了 CRS/HIPEC 治疗。将类器官在 37°C 和 42°C 下平行灌注,使用低剂量和高剂量奥沙利铂(200mg/m2,持续 2 小时与 460mg/m2,持续 30 分钟)和丝裂霉素 C(40mg/3L,持续 2 小时)。进行了活力测定,并进行了汇总分析。
75%(6/8)的结肠癌患者和 73%(11/15)的阑尾癌患者生成了足够数量的类器官。所有 42°C 处理的活力均低于 37°C 处理。在汇总分析中,对于阑尾和结肠癌类器官,丝裂霉素 C 和 200mg/m2 奥沙利铂治疗没有差异(19%比 25%,p=0.22 和 27%比 31%,p=0.55),而加热丝裂霉素 C 优于 460mg/m2 奥沙利铂(19%比 54%,p<0.001 和 27%比 53%,p=0.002)。在阑尾和结肠癌肿瘤类器官中,与 460mg/m2 奥沙利铂相比,加热 200mg/m2 奥沙利铂显示出更高的细胞毒性(25%比 54%,p<0.001 和 31%比 53%,p=0.008)。
与 30 分钟 460mg/m2 奥沙利铂相比,用丝裂霉素 C 或加热 2 小时的 200mg/m2 奥沙利铂处理的类器官显示出更高的敏感性。最佳灌注方案在患者之间存在差异,类器官技术可能为将 HIPEC 条件定制到个体患者水平提供平台。