Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute (APH), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 7;15(7):e0234551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234551. eCollection 2020.
Historically, the Netherlands has hosted a large number of migrant sex workers. Since sex work is considered a legal profession it might serve as an example of better access to health services, including HIV testing, at least for those working within the legal framework. However, migrant sex workers, especially non-European Union (EU) nationals, might not be eligible to register for official employment and thus face obstacles in obtaining access to health services, becoming essentially invisible. This study examined context-specific vulnerabilities of migrant female sex workers (FSWs) from Belarus, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine, whether and how they have access to HIV testing compared to other EE, non-EU migrant FSWs in Amsterdam in the Netherlands. We conducted a multi-stakeholder perspective study from November 2015 to September 2017 in Amsterdam. The study comprised 1) semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (N = 19); 2) in-depth interviews with Eastern European, non-EU migrant FSWs (N = 5) and field observations of the escort agency working with them; and 3) in-depth interviews with key stakeholders (N = 12). We found six key barriers to HIV testing: 1) migration and sex-work policies; 2) stigma, including self-stigmatization; 3) lack of trust in healthcare providers or social workers; 4) low levels of Dutch or English languages; 5) negative experience in accessing healthcare services in the home country; and 6) low perceived risk and HIV-related knowledge. Having a family and children, social support and working at the licensed sex-work venues might facilitate HIV testing. However, Internet-based sex workers remain invisible in the sex-work industry. Our findings indicate the importance of addressing women's diverse experiences, shaped by intrapersonal, interpersonal, community, network and policy-level factors, with stigma being at the core. We call for the scaling up of outreach interventions focusing on FSWs and, in particular, migrant FSWs working online.
从历史上看,荷兰曾有大量移民性工作者。由于性工作被视为一种合法职业,因此它可能为更好地获得包括艾滋病毒检测在内的卫生服务提供了一个范例,至少对于那些在法律框架内工作的人来说是如此。然而,移民性工作者,特别是非欧盟(EU)国民,可能没有资格注册正式就业,因此在获得卫生服务方面面临障碍,基本上处于隐形状态。本研究考察了来自白俄罗斯、摩尔多瓦、俄罗斯和乌克兰的移民女性性工作者(FSW)的具体背景下的脆弱性,以及她们与阿姆斯特丹的其他东欧、非欧盟移民 FSW 相比,是否以及如何获得艾滋病毒检测。我们于 2015 年 11 月至 2017 年 9 月在阿姆斯特丹进行了一项多利益攸关方视角的研究。该研究包括:1)与关键利益攸关方进行半结构化访谈(N=19);2)对东欧、非欧盟移民 FSW 进行深入访谈(N=5),并对与他们合作的伴游机构进行实地观察;3)与关键利益攸关方进行深入访谈(N=12)。我们发现了六个艾滋病毒检测的关键障碍:1)移民和性工作政策;2)耻辱感,包括自我耻辱感;3)对医疗保健提供者或社会工作者缺乏信任;4)荷兰语或英语水平低;5)在原籍国获得医疗保健服务的负面经历;以及 6)对风险和艾滋病毒相关知识的认识不足。有家庭和孩子、社会支持以及在许可的性工作场所工作可能会促进艾滋病毒检测。然而,基于互联网的性工作者在性工作行业中仍然是隐形的。我们的研究结果表明,必须解决妇女的各种经历,这些经历受到个人、人际、社区、网络和政策层面因素的影响,而耻辱感是核心。我们呼吁扩大外联干预措施,重点关注性工作者,特别是在线工作的移民性工作者。