Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; King's College London Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Campus, London, MSc in Aesthetic Dentistry, United Kingdom.
Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J Dent. 2020 Sep;100:103427. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103427. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
To investigate the impact of an e-training resource with the consistency of tooth wear scoring using the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE).
Gold standard (GS) BEWE scores were attained from a trained examiner using the photographic and dental cast records for three conveniently selected cases representing low, medium and severe tooth wear. Four successive cohorts of first year post-graduate students, (n = 76, mean age, 35.4 years) undertook a training exercise. Each was given written guidance on using the BEWE. Following e-training, scoring was repeated, and the results expressed as mean, confidence Intervals, (95% ci) and p-values (values <0.05 were considered statistically significant).
The e-training resulted in a mean improvement in the agreement with the GS score by 15.6% and 15.3%, using the records of the medium and severe tooth wear cases, (cumulative BEWE scores of 13 and 15 respectively). Post-training reductions were reported, with the mean number of disagreements with the GS and the mean change in the size of disagreement with the GS scores with records for the medium and severe cases (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). No significant difference was revealed for the low wear case.
e-training resulted in significant improvements in scoring BEWE, compared to the gold standard.
Online training resources can help provide training with the BEWE.
使用基本侵蚀性磨损检查(BEWE)调查具有一致性牙齿磨损评分的电子培训资源的影响。
使用照相和牙模记录,从经过培训的检查者那里获得金标准(GS)BEWE 评分,选择三个方便的案例代表低、中、重度牙齿磨损。四组连续的第一年研究生(n=76,平均年龄 35.4 岁)接受了培训练习。每位学生都获得了关于使用 BEWE 的书面指导。电子培训后,重复评分,并表示为平均值、置信区间(95%置信区间)和 p 值(<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义)。
电子培训使与 GS 评分的一致性平均提高了 15.6%和 15.3%,分别使用中度和重度牙齿磨损病例的记录(累积 BEWE 评分分别为 13 和 15)。报告了培训后的减少,中度和重度病例的 GS 评分与 GS 评分记录的不一致数量平均值和不一致大小的平均值变化(p=0.001 和 p<0.001)。对于轻度磨损病例,没有发现显著差异。
与金标准相比,电子培训在 BEWE 评分方面取得了显著提高。
在线培训资源可以帮助提供 BEWE 培训。