Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Microbiology Section, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Jul 7;46(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00859-8.
Allergic rhinitis (AR) and adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) are the most frequent causative disorders of nasal obstruction in children, leading to recurrent respiratory infections. Both nasal cavities are colonized by a stable microbial community susceptible to environmental changes and Staphylococcus aureus seems to play the major role. Furthermore, nasal microbiota holds a large number and variety of viruses with upper respiratory tract infections. This local microbiota deserves attention because its modification could induce a virtuous cross-talking with the immune system, with a better clearance of pathogens. Although AR and AH present a different etiopathogenesis, they have in common a minimal chronic inflammation surrounding nasal obstruction; hence it would be challenging to evaluate the effect of an immunomodulator on this minimal chronic inflammation with possible clinical and microbiological effects. The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate the efficacy of an immunomoldulator (Pidotimod) on nasal obstruction in children with AR and/or AH and whether its action involves a variation of nasal microbiota.
We enrolled 76 children: those with allergic rhinitis (AR) sensitized to dust mites entered the AR group, those with adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) the AH group, those with both conditions the AR/AH group and those without AR ± AH as controls (CTRL). At the first visit they performed: skin prick tests, nasal fiberoptic endoscopy, anterior rhinomanometry, nasal swabs. Children with. AR ± AH started treatment with Pidotimod. After 1 month they were re-evaluated performing the same procedures. The primary outcome was the evaluation of nasal obstruction after treatment and the secondary outcome was the improvement of symptoms and the changes in nasal microflora.
All patients improved their mean nasal flow (mNF) in respect to the baseline. In AR children mNF reached that one of CTRL. In AH children±AR the mNF was lower in respect to CTRL and AR group. We did not find any differences among all the groups at the two different time points in nasal microflora.
Pidotimod is able to give an improvement in nasal obstruction, especially in AR children but this effect seems to be not mediated by changes in nasal microbiota.
变应性鼻炎(AR)和腺样体肥大(AH)是导致儿童鼻腔阻塞的最常见病因,导致反复呼吸道感染。两个鼻腔都被一个稳定的微生物群定植,易受环境变化的影响,金黄色葡萄球菌似乎起着主要作用。此外,鼻腔微生物群携带大量的呼吸道感染病毒。这个局部微生物群值得关注,因为它的改变可以与免疫系统进行良性交流,从而更好地清除病原体。虽然 AR 和 AH 具有不同的发病机制,但它们都有一个共同的特点,即围绕鼻腔阻塞的最小慢性炎症;因此,评估免疫调节剂对这种最小慢性炎症的疗效及其可能的临床和微生物学效果将是具有挑战性的。因此,本研究旨在评估免疫调节剂(匹多莫德)对 AR 和/或 AH 儿童鼻腔阻塞的疗效,以及其作用是否涉及鼻腔微生物群的变化。
我们招募了 76 名儿童:对尘螨过敏的儿童进入 AR 组,腺样体肥大的儿童进入 AH 组,同时存在两种情况的儿童进入 AR/AH 组,没有 AR 和 AH 的儿童作为对照组(CTRL)。在第一次就诊时,他们进行了皮肤点刺试验、鼻纤维内镜检查、前鼻测压和鼻腔拭子检查。AR±AH 的儿童开始使用匹多莫德治疗。一个月后,他们进行了同样的评估。主要结局是治疗后评估鼻腔阻塞情况,次要结局是改善症状和鼻腔微生物群的变化。
所有患者的平均鼻流量(mNF)均较基线有所改善。在 AR 儿童中,mNF 达到了 CTRL 的水平。在 AH 儿童±AR 中,mNF 低于 CTRL 和 AR 组。在两个不同的时间点,我们没有发现所有组在鼻腔微生物群之间存在任何差异。
匹多莫德能够改善鼻腔阻塞,尤其是在 AR 儿童中,但这种效果似乎不是通过鼻腔微生物群的改变来介导的。