Bliven E, Sandriesser S, Augat P, von Rüden C, Hackl S
Institute for Biomechanics, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany.
Institute for Biomechanics, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Bone Joint Res. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):314-321. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.96.BJR-2019-0331.R1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Evaluate if treating an unstable femoral neck fracture with a locking plate and spring-loaded telescoping screw system would improve construct stability compared to gold standard treatment methods.
A 31B2 Pauwels' type III osteotomy with additional posterior wedge was cut into 30 fresh-frozen femur cadavers implanted with either: three cannulated screws in an inverted triangle configuration (CS), a sliding hip screw and anti-rotation screw (SHS), or a locking plate system with spring-loaded telescoping screws (LP). Dynamic cyclic compressive testing representative of walking with increasing weight-bearing was applied until failure was observed. Loss of fracture reduction was recorded using a high-resolution optical motion tracking system.
LP constructs demonstrated the highest mean values for initial stiffness and failure load. LP and SHS constructs survived on mean over 50% more cycles and to loads 450 N higher than CS. During the early stages of cyclic loading, mean varus collapse of the femoral head was 0.5° (SD 0.8°) for LP, 0.7° (SD 0.7°) for SHS, and 1.9° (SD 2.3°) for CS (p = 0.071). At 30,000 cycles (1,050 N) mean femoral neck shortening was 1.8 mm (SD 1.9) for LP, 2.0 mm (SD 0.9) for SHS, and 3.2 mm (SD 2.5) for CS (p = 0.262). Mean leg shortening at construct failure was 4.9 mm (SD 2.7) for LP, 8.9 mm (SD 3.2) for SHS, and 7.0 mm (SD 4.3) for CS (p = 0.046).
Use of the LP system provided similar (hip screw) or better (cannulated screws) biomechanical performance as the current gold standard methods suggesting that the LP system could be a promising alternative for the treatment of unstable fractures of the femoral neck.Cite this article: 2020;9(6):314-321.
评估与金标准治疗方法相比,使用锁定钢板和弹簧加载伸缩螺钉系统治疗不稳定型股骨颈骨折是否能提高结构稳定性。
对30具新鲜冷冻的股骨尸体进行31B2 Pauwels III型截骨并附加后楔形截骨,然后植入以下装置之一:呈倒三角形配置的三根空心螺钉(CS)、一枚滑动髋螺钉和一枚防旋转螺钉(SHS)或带有弹簧加载伸缩螺钉的锁定钢板系统(LP)。施加代表负重增加的动态循环压缩测试,直至观察到失效。使用高分辨率光学运动跟踪系统记录骨折复位丢失情况。
LP结构在初始刚度和失效载荷方面的平均值最高。LP和SHS结构的平均存活周期比CS多50%以上,承受的载荷比CS高450 N。在循环加载的早期阶段,LP组股骨头平均内翻塌陷为0.5°(标准差0.8°),SHS组为0.7°(标准差0.7°),CS组为1.9°(标准差2.3°)(p = 0.071)。在30000次循环(1050 N)时,LP组股骨颈平均缩短1.8 mm(标准差1.9),SHS组为2.0 mm(标准差0.9),CS组为3.2 mm(标准差2.5)(p = 0.262)。结构失效时的平均腿缩短情况为:LP组4.9 mm(标准差2.7),SHS组8.9 mm(标准差3.2),CS组7.0 mm(标准差4.3)(p = 0.046)。
LP系统的使用提供了与当前金标准方法相似(髋螺钉)或更好(空心螺钉)的生物力学性能,表明LP系统可能是治疗不稳定型股骨颈骨折的一种有前景的替代方法。引用本文:2020;9(6):314 - 321。