Suppr超能文献

经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗 Kummell 病:侧开套管或前开套管的应用?

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty with Side-Opening Cannula or Front-Opening Cannula in the Treatment of Kummell Disease?

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, ZiBo, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Rizhao Central Hospital, Rizhao, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1190-1198. doi: 10.1111/os.12730. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of bone cement distribution, cement leakage, and clinical outcomes with side-opening cannula for bone cement injection in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in treatment of Kummell disease.

METHODS

A prospective study of patients with Kummell disease undergoing PVP was conducted from April 2012 to September 2017. In total, 43 patients (11 males, 32 females) with Kummell disease who received bilateral PVP were included in the study. The patients were divided into front-opening cannulas (FOC) group with front-opening cannulas and side-opening cannulas (SOC) group with side-opening cannulas. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The patient general information such as gender, age, bone density, compression ratio, operative time, and location of fracture vertebrae were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), bone cement distribution, radiation exposure time, bone cement leakage rate and vertebral height, and kyphosis angle were measured and compared for two groups before surgery, 1 day and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were enrolled, including 11 males and 32 females, aged 61-84 years. The bone density (T value) was 2.5 ± 0.6 in FOC group and 2.4 ± 0.6 in SOC group (P > 0.05). The compression ratio and operative time were 36.1% ± 13.0%, 39.3 ± 7.9 min in FOC group and 35.2% ± 13.7%, 40.0 ± 10.7 min in SOC group (P > 0.05). There was no significance between FOC and SOC groups in the location of fracture vertebrae. All patients underwent at least 6 months of follow-up. At 6 months postoperatively, the VAS and ODI were significantly higher in the FOC group (3.0 ± 0.8, 35.7% ± 2.1%) than in the SOC group (1.3 ± 0.4, 18.6% ± 2.4%) (P < 0.05). The cement leakage rate of the SOC group was 4.8%, which was lower than that of the FOC group (31.8%, P < 0.05), and the bone cement distribution ratio was higher than that of the FOC group (63.1% ± 7.9% vs 40.5% ± 8.6%, P < 0.05). At 6 months after operation, the height of the anterior and posterior vertebral bodies of the patients in the SOC group restored better than the FOC group (anterior SOC: FOC 5.1 ± 0.5 mm vs 4.5 ± 0.5 mm; posterior SOC: FOC 0.6 ± 0.1 mm vs 0.3 ± 0.1 mm, P < 0.05), and the kyphosis correction was more obvious than patients in FOC group (SOC: FOC 8.5° ± 1.4° vs 4.6° ± 0.8°, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous vertebroplasty with side-opening cannula is safe and effective in avoiding bone cement leakage, improving bone cement distribution, and restoring vertebral height.

摘要

目的

探讨侧开口套管在经皮椎体后凸成形术中(PVP)骨水泥注射中的骨水泥分布、骨水泥渗漏及临床效果,以治疗 Kummell 病。

方法

前瞻性研究 2012 年 4 月至 2017 年 9 月收治的 Kummell 病患者,43 例 Kummell 病患者(男 11 例,女 32 例)接受双侧 PVP 治疗。患者分为前开口套管(FOC)组和侧开口套管(SOC)组。所有患者均随访 6 个月。记录患者一般信息,如性别、年龄、骨密度、压缩比、手术时间和骨折椎体部位。测量并比较两组患者术前、术后 1 天和 6 个月时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)、骨水泥分布、辐射暴露时间、骨水泥渗漏率和椎体高度、后凸角。

结果

共纳入 43 例患者,男 11 例,女 32 例,年龄 61-84 岁。FOC 组和 SOC 组的骨密度(T 值)分别为 2.5±0.6 和 2.4±0.6(P>0.05)。压缩比和手术时间分别为 36.1%±13.0%、39.3±7.9min 和 35.2%±13.7%、40.0±10.7min(P>0.05)。两组患者骨折椎体部位无显著差异。所有患者均至少随访 6 个月。术后 6 个月,FOC 组 VAS(3.0±0.8)和 ODI(35.7%±2.1)评分均显著高于 SOC 组(1.3±0.4 和 18.6%±2.4)(P<0.05)。SOC 组骨水泥渗漏率为 4.8%,低于 FOC 组的 31.8%(P<0.05),骨水泥分布率高于 FOC 组(63.1%±7.9%比 40.5%±8.6%)(P<0.05)。术后 6 个月,SOC 组患者的椎体前、后高度恢复优于 FOC 组(椎体前 SOC:FOC 5.1±0.5mm 比 4.5±0.5mm;椎体后 SOC:FOC 0.6±0.1mm 比 0.3±0.1mm)(P<0.05),后凸角矫正也优于 FOC 组(SOC:FOC 8.5°±1.4°比 4.6°±0.8°)(P<0.05)。

结论

经皮椎体后凸成形术侧开口套管能安全有效地避免骨水泥渗漏,改善骨水泥分布,恢复椎体高度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19fd/7454207/5a64da648425/OS-12-1190-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验