Figueras-Alvarez Oscar, Cantó-Navés Oriol, Cabratosa-Termes Josep, Roig-Cayón Miguel, Felipe-Spada Natalia, Tomàs-Aliberas Jordi
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of TMJ, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Nov 15;16(11):1971-1974. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8676.
To compare the assessment of snoring using the SnoreLab application (app) using three different smartphones by one participant to validate SnoreLab as a method for collecting data for studies on the effectiveness of snoring treatment.
A person from the research group was monitored for 30 consecutive nights with the SnoreLab app using three different smartphones (Xiaomi MI8Pro, Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and BQ Aquaris V). The SnoreLab app instructions were strictly followed, and data were collected from the app.
No significant differences were found in the measurements from the three smartphones in the time in bed, all snoring time, snoring percentage, and quiet time. BQ and Samsung smartphones determined significantly more light snoring time than did the Xiaomi smartphone. The Samsung smartphone assessed significantly less loud snoring time than did the Xiaomi smartphone and measured the shortest epic snoring time. The lowest Snore Score was calculated with the Samsung smartphone, the highest with the Xiaomi smartphone. Pearson's correlation coefficients demonstrated a relatively strong relationship between the Snore Score measured with the three smartphones.
Even though there was a relatively strong relationship between the Snore Score measured with the three smartphones by one participant, the observed differences make it difficult to use this index as a method of collecting data for studies on snoring treatment effectiveness when patients use different smartphones; however, the SnoreLab app may be handy to quantify treatment effectiveness for a specific patient, provided the patient always uses the same smartphone.
由一名参与者使用三款不同的智能手机,通过SnoreLab应用程序(app)比较对打鼾的评估,以验证SnoreLab作为收集打鼾治疗效果研究数据的一种方法。
研究小组的一名人员使用三款不同的智能手机(小米MI8 Pro、三星Galaxy Alpha和BQ Aquaris V),通过SnoreLab应用程序连续监测30个晚上。严格遵循SnoreLab应用程序的说明,并从该应用程序收集数据。
三款智能手机在卧床时间、总打鼾时间、打鼾百分比和安静时间的测量结果中未发现显著差异。BQ和三星智能手机确定的轻度打鼾时间比小米智能手机显著更多。三星智能手机评估的重度打鼾时间比小米智能手机显著更少,且测量的最长鼾声时间最短。用三星智能手机计算出的鼾声评分最低,用小米智能手机计算出的鼾声评分最高。Pearson相关系数表明,三款智能手机测量的鼾声评分之间存在相对较强的关系。
尽管一名参与者使用三款智能手机测量的鼾声评分之间存在相对较强的关系,但观察到的差异使得当患者使用不同智能手机时,难以将该指标用作收集打鼾治疗效果研究数据的方法;然而,如果患者始终使用同一部智能手机,SnoreLab应用程序可能便于量化特定患者的治疗效果。