Schneider P, Börner W, Mazess R B, Barden H
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, FRG.
Bone Miner. 1988 Jul;4(3):279-87.
Bone measurements were made in young normal women (n = 125) using single-photon absorptiometry (SPA with 125I) of the radius shaft and ultradistal radius, dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA with 153Gd) of the lumbar spine and the proximal femur, and 125I-based quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the distal radius. Measurements of the appendicular and axial sites also were made in 21 women with spinal osteoporosis. The standard error of estimate in predicting axial densities from peripheral measurements was about 0.11 g/cm2 (10-13%) with all methods. The osteoporotic-normal difference was 21% for SPA of the radius shaft and 125I-QCT of the distal radius, 30% for the lumbar spine and 34% for the femoral neck. Prediction of spine and femur density, and diagnostic sensitivity, with 125I-QCT were equivalent to that obtained with conventional SPA, but the precision of 125I-QCT (0.8%) was 2-3 times better than both SPA and DPA.
对125名年轻正常女性使用单光子吸收法(125I的SPA)测量桡骨干和桡骨远端、双光子吸收法(153Gd的DPA)测量腰椎和股骨近端以及基于125I的定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)测量桡骨远端进行骨测量。还对21名患有脊柱骨质疏松症的女性进行了四肢和轴向部位的测量。所有方法从外周测量预测轴向密度的估计标准误差约为0.11g/cm²(10 - 13%)。桡骨干的SPA和桡骨远端的125I - QCT的骨质疏松症与正常的差异为21%,腰椎为30%,股骨颈为34%。125I - QCT对脊柱和股骨密度的预测以及诊断敏感性与传统SPA相当,但125I - QCT的精度(0.8%)比SPA和DPA都要好2 - 3倍。