Dental Academy for Continuing Professional Development, Karlsruhe, Lorenzstrasse 7, 76135, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital, Saarland University, Building 73, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01179-3.
It is not well-known which pre-implantological procedures are preferred by maxillofacial (MFS) and oral surgeons (OS) for the narrow atrophic alveolar ridge under practice based conditions and, if different training paths in surgery lead to other pre-implantological techniques being preferred. This study aims to identify which procedures are preferred by the respective specialists in which indication.
A questionnaire was sent to a total of 300 MFS and OS in southern Germany. The questionnaire examined pre-implantological procedures (bone block, bone grafting material and/or particulate autogenous bone, titanium mesh, bone split, resection) in the edentulous severely atrophic mandible and in the severely atrophic single-tooth gap. Kendall's Tau-b test was used for statistical analyses.
One hundred seventeen participants returned the questionnaire. 68 (58%) were OS and 49 (42%) were MFS. In the edentulous mandible, bone substitute material and resection were most preferred by both specialists. Bone blocks were statistically significantly more frequently associated with MFS and bone substitute materials with OS. Bone split was more frequently used in the atrophic single tooth gap than in the edentulous mandible. OS preferred bone blocks in the single tooth gap more often than in the edentulous mandible. MFS and OS preferred resection in the edentulous mandible significantly more frequently than in the single tooth gap.
MFS in general prefer more invasive pre-implantological therapies with the same initial diagnosis than OS, which seems to be attributed to different training paths.
在基于实践的条件下,颌面外科医生(MFS)和口腔外科医生(OS)对狭窄萎缩的牙槽嵴更喜欢哪些植入前程序尚不清楚,如果手术的不同培训路径导致更倾向于其他植入前技术,那么哪些程序是各自专科医生在哪些适应症中更倾向于使用的。本研究旨在确定在无牙严重萎缩下颌骨和严重萎缩单牙间隙中,各自的专家分别更倾向于哪些程序。
向德国南部的总共 300 名 MFS 和 OS 发送了一份问卷。该问卷检查了植入前程序(骨块、骨移植材料和/或颗粒自体骨、钛网、骨劈开、切除)在无牙严重萎缩下颌骨和严重萎缩单牙间隙中的应用。采用 Kendall's Tau-b 检验进行统计学分析。
117 名参与者返回了问卷。68 名(58%)为 OS,49 名(42%)为 MFS。在无牙下颌骨中,骨替代材料和切除是两种专家最倾向使用的方法。骨块与 MFS 更相关,而骨替代材料与 OS 更相关。骨劈开在萎缩的单牙间隙中比在无牙下颌骨中更常用。OS 在单牙间隙中比在无牙下颌骨中更倾向于使用骨块。MFS 和 OS 在无牙下颌骨中比在单牙间隙中更倾向于使用切除。
与 OS 相比,MFS 总体上更喜欢更具侵入性的植入前治疗方法,这似乎归因于不同的培训路径。