• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卒中后改善初级护理(IPCAS)随机对照试验:多维过程评估方案

Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) randomised controlled trial: protocol for a multidimensional process evaluation.

作者信息

Aquino Maria Raisa Jessica Ryc, Mullis Ricky, Kreit Elizabeth, Johnson Vicki, Grant Julie, Lim Lisa, Sutton Stephen, Mant Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 8;10(7):e036879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036879.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036879
PMID:32641334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7348649/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Primary care interventions are often multicomponent, with several targets (eg, patients and healthcare professionals). Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) is a novel primary care-based model of long-term stroke care involving a review of stroke-related needs, a self-management programme, a direct point of contact in general practice, enhanced communication between care services, and a directory of national and local community services, currently being evaluated in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). Informed by Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions and the Behaviour Change Consortium fidelity framework, this protocol outlines the process evaluation of IPCAS within this RCT. The process evaluation aimed to explore how the intervention was delivered in context and how participants engaged with the intervention.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Mixed methods will be used: (1) design: intervention content will be compared with 'usual care'; (2) training: intervention training sessions will be audio/video-recorded where feasible; (3) delivery: healthcare professional self-reports, audio recordings of intervention delivery and observations of My Life After Stroke course (10% of reviews and sessions) will be coded separately; semistructured interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of healthcare professionals; (4) receipt and (5) enactment: where available, structured stroke review records will be analysed quantitatively; semistructured interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of study participants. Self-reports, observations and audio/video recordings will be coded and scored using specifically developed checklists. Semistructured interviews will be analysed thematically. Data will be analysed iteratively, independent of primary endpoint analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Favourable ethical opinion was gained from Yorkshire & The Humber-Bradford Leeds NHS Research Ethics Committee (19 December 2017, 17/YH/0441). Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03353519; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

初级保健干预措施通常包含多个组成部分,有多个目标对象(例如患者和医疗保健专业人员)。卒中后改善初级保健(IPCAS)是一种新型的基于初级保健的长期卒中护理模式,包括对卒中相关需求的评估、自我管理计划、全科医疗中的直接联系点、护理服务之间加强沟通以及国家和地方社区服务目录,目前正在一项整群随机对照试验(RCT)中进行评估。本方案依据医学研究理事会关于复杂干预措施的指南以及行为改变联盟的保真度框架,概述了该RCT中IPCAS的过程评估。过程评估旨在探究干预措施在实际情境中的实施方式以及参与者对干预措施的参与情况。

方法与分析

将采用混合方法:(1)设计:将干预内容与“常规护理”进行比较;(2)培训:可行的情况下,对干预培训课程进行音频/视频录制;(3)实施:医疗保健专业人员的自我报告、干预实施的音频记录以及对“卒中后我的生活”课程(10%的评估和课程)的观察将分别进行编码;将对有目的抽样的医疗保健专业人员进行半结构化访谈;(4)接受情况和(5)实施情况:如有可用的结构化卒中评估记录,将进行定量分析;将对有目的抽样的研究参与者进行半结构化访谈。自我报告、观察结果以及音频/视频记录将使用专门制定的清单进行编码和评分。半结构化访谈将进行主题分析。数据将独立于主要终点分析进行迭代分析。

伦理与传播

获得了约克郡和亨伯-布拉德福德利兹国民保健服务研究伦理委员会的有利伦理意见(2017年12月19日,17/YH/0441)。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并在相关会议上展示。

试验注册号

NCT03353519;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1421/7348649/00fc0b25b02b/bmjopen-2020-036879f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1421/7348649/00fc0b25b02b/bmjopen-2020-036879f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1421/7348649/00fc0b25b02b/bmjopen-2020-036879f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) randomised controlled trial: protocol for a multidimensional process evaluation.卒中后改善初级护理(IPCAS)随机对照试验:多维过程评估方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 8;10(7):e036879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036879.
2
Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) trial: protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a novel model of care for stroke survivors living in the community.改善卒中后初级保健(IPCAS)试验:一项随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估一种针对社区中卒中幸存者的新型护理模式。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e030285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030285.
3
Intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour and improve outcomes after stroke (Get Set Go): a study protocol for the process evaluation of a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RECREATE).干预以减少中风后久坐行为并改善结局(开始行动):一项针对试点整群随机对照试验(再造)的过程评价的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 12;13(9):e075363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075363.
4
5
Protocol for the process and feasibility evaluations of a new model of primary care service delivery for managing pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (PARTNER) using a mixed methods approach.采用混合方法评估管理膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和功能的新型初级保健服务提供新模式(PARTNER)的过程和可行性的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 4;10(2):e034526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034526.
6
RECREATE: a study protocol for a multicentre pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) in UK stroke services evaluating an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in stroke survivors (Get Set Go) with embedded process and economic evaluations.RECREATE:一项多中心试点整群随机对照试验(cRCT)的研究方案,在英国卒中服务中评估一项干预措施,以减少卒中幸存者的久坐行为(Get Set Go),并嵌入了过程和经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 30;13(7):e074607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074607.
7
A Self-Management Programme of Activity Coping and Education - SPACE for COPD(C) - in primary care: The protocol for a pragmatic trial.一项针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的活动应对与教育自我管理计划——SPACE for COPD(C)——在初级保健中的应用:一项实用试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e014463. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014463.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory.RETurn to work After stroKE(RETAKE)试验:使用正常化进程理论的混合方法过程评估议定书。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):e053111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053111.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing a new model of primary care for stroke survivors living in the community: a mixed-methods process evaluation.为社区中风幸存者实施新的初级保健模式:一项混合方法的过程评估。
Trials. 2025 Jul 19;26(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08957-w.
2
Patients' experience of and participation in a stroke self-management programme, My Life After Stroke (MLAS): a multimethod study.患者参与卒中自我管理项目(My Life After Stroke,MLAS)的体验:一项多方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):e062700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062700.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing quality fidelity and engagement measures for complex health interventions.开发复杂健康干预措施的质量保真度和参与度衡量标准。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Feb;25(1):39-60. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12394. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
2
Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) trial: protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a novel model of care for stroke survivors living in the community.改善卒中后初级保健(IPCAS)试验:一项随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估一种针对社区中卒中幸存者的新型护理模式。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e030285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030285.
3
Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study.
使用清单来促进中风后长期护理需求的管理:来自焦点小组和可行性研究的见解。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jan 4;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0894-3.
4
Stroke survivors' and informal caregivers' experiences of primary care and community healthcare services - A systematic review and meta-ethnography.中风幸存者及非正式照护者对初级保健和社区医疗服务的体验——一项系统评价与元民族志研究
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192533. eCollection 2018.
5
Measures of fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions: A systematic review of measure quality.评估复杂面对面健康行为改变干预措施的传递和参与的忠实度的测量方法:测量质量的系统评价。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):872-903. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12260. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
Global Burden of Stroke.全球卒中负担。
Circ Res. 2017 Feb 3;120(3):439-448. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308413.
7
A multidimensional approach to assessing intervention fidelity in a process evaluation of audit and feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions: a study protocol.在一项旨在减少不必要输血的审核与反馈干预措施的过程评估中,采用多维方法评估干预保真度:一项研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2016 Dec 12;11(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0528-x.
8
Protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of family-led rehabilitation post stroke (ATTEND) in India.印度中风后家庭主导康复随机对照试验(ATTEND)的过程评估方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 15;6(9):e012027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012027.
9
Improving reporting and utility of evaluations of complex interventions.提高复杂干预措施评估的报告质量和实用性。
Evid Based Med. 2016 Feb;21(1):1-3. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2015-110342. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
Stroke Prevention Worldwide--What Could Make It Work?全球范围内的中风预防——如何才能取得成效?
Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):215-20. doi: 10.1159/000441104. Epub 2015 Oct 28.