Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 7;10(7):e038430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038430.
The BRIGhTMIND study aims to determine the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and mechanism of action of connectivity guided intermittent theta burst stimulation (cgiTBS) versus standard repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in adults with moderate to severe treatment resistant depression.
The study is a randomised double-blind controlled trial with 1:1 allocation to either 20 sessions of (1) cgiTBS or (2) neuronavigated rTMS not using connectivity guidance. A total of 368 eligible participants with a diagnosis of current unipolar major depressive disorder that is both treatment resistant (defined as scoring 2 or more on the Massachusetts General Hospital Staging Score) and moderate to severe (scoring 16 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17)), will be recruited from primary and secondary care settings at four treatment centres in the UK. The primary outcome is depression response at 16 weeks (50% or greater reduction in HDRS-17 score from baseline). Secondary outcomes include assessments of self-rated depression, anxiety, psychosocial functioning, cognition and quality of life at 8, 16 and 26 weeks postrandomisation. Cost-effectiveness, patient acceptability, safety, mechanism of action and predictors of response will also be examined.
Ethical approval was granted by East Midlands Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee (ref: 18/EM/0232) on 30 August 2018. The results of the study will be published in relevant peer-reviewed journals, and then through professional and public conferences and media. Further publications will explore patient experience, moderators and mediators of outcome and mechanism of action.
ISRCTN19674644.
BRIGhTMIND 研究旨在确定连接引导间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(cgiTBS)与标准重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在中重度治疗抵抗性抑郁症成人中的临床效果、成本效益和作用机制。
该研究是一项随机、双盲对照试验,采用 1:1 分配,分别接受(1)20 次 cgiTBS 或(2)不使用连接引导的神经导航 rTMS。共有 368 名符合条件的参与者,他们被诊断为当前单相重度抑郁症,且具有治疗抵抗性(定义为马萨诸塞州综合医院分期评分(Massachusetts General Hospital Staging Score)得分为 2 或以上)和中重度(汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(17 项)(Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17,HDRS-17)得分为 16),将从英国四个治疗中心的初级和二级保健机构招募。主要结局是 16 周时的抑郁反应(HDRS-17 评分从基线降低 50%或以上)。次要结局包括在随机分组后 8、16 和 26 周时自我评估的抑郁、焦虑、心理社会功能、认知和生活质量的评估。还将检查成本效益、患者可接受性、安全性、作用机制和反应预测因素。
伦理批准于 2018 年 8 月 30 日由东米德兰兹莱斯特中央研究伦理委员会(ref:18/EM/0232)授予。该研究的结果将发表在相关的同行评议期刊上,然后通过专业和公众会议和媒体发布。进一步的出版物将探讨患者的体验、结局的调节因素和中介因素以及作用机制。
ISRCTN82446554。