• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于植入超环生物心脏瓣膜的外翻与非外翻缝合技术比较

comparison of everting non-everting suture techniques for the implantation of a supra-annular biological heart valve.

作者信息

Puluca Nazan, Münsterer Andrea, Prinzing Anatol, Sexton Zachary A, Lange Rüdiger, Meyer-Saraei Roza, Scharfschwerdt Michael

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany.

Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2443-2449. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.55.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2020.03.55
PMID:32642150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7330396/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effect of different suturing techniques for aortic valve replacement (AVR) . Whether or not the applied suturing technique impacts the outflow tract diameter by narrowing the annulus diameter was examined.

METHODS

The commonly applied non-everting pledget forced suture technique (NE, n=13) was compared with an everting pledget forced suture (ET, n=13) for AVR using the 25 mm St. Jude Trifecta aortic valve. Hemodynamic parameters were obtained in a pulsatile flow simulator. A high speed camera captured the visual aspects of the suturing technique.

RESULTS

Despite some kind of left ventricular outflow narrowing due to protruding pledgets using the NE suture technique, mean pressure gradients of both techniques were nearly similar (NE 5.88±2.7 mmHg, ET 5.23±1.31 mmHg, P=0.44). Closing volume (NE 3.16±0.48 mL; ET 3.51±0.68 mL; P=0.14) and the leakage volume (NE: 8.09±2.53 mL; ET: 8.35±3.65 mL; P=0.83) also showed no differences.

CONCLUSIONS

AVR using either suturing techniques leads to a similar hemodynamic performance . The impact of the suturing technique may be higher in a smaller annulus. Therefore, further studies using smaller prostheses are necessary.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估不同缝合技术用于主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的血流动力学效果。研究了所应用的缝合技术是否会通过缩小瓣环直径而影响流出道直径。

方法

使用25mm圣犹达Trifecta主动脉瓣,将常用于AVR的非外翻带垫片强制缝合技术(NE,n = 13)与外翻带垫片强制缝合技术(ET,n = 13)进行比较。在脉动流模拟器中获取血流动力学参数。高速摄像机记录了缝合技术的视觉情况。

结果

尽管使用NE缝合技术时由于带垫片突出导致左心室流出道有所狭窄,但两种技术的平均压力梯度几乎相似(NE 5.88±2.7mmHg,ET 5.23±1.31mmHg,P = 0.44)。闭合容积(NE 3.16±0.48mL;ET 3.51±0.68mL;P = 0.14)和漏血容积(NE:8.09±2.53mL;ET:8.35±3.65mL;P = 0.83)也无差异。

结论

采用任何一种缝合技术进行AVR均能产生相似的血流动力学表现。在较小的瓣环中,缝合技术的影响可能更大。因此,有必要使用更小的人工瓣膜进行进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/9819bcb373aa/jtd-12-05-2443-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/9cce2ae7b8a7/jtd-12-05-2443-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/22fc461e8b2a/jtd-12-05-2443-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/a2ff3d9dcfab/jtd-12-05-2443-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/9819bcb373aa/jtd-12-05-2443-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/9cce2ae7b8a7/jtd-12-05-2443-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/22fc461e8b2a/jtd-12-05-2443-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/a2ff3d9dcfab/jtd-12-05-2443-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/7330396/9819bcb373aa/jtd-12-05-2443-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
comparison of everting non-everting suture techniques for the implantation of a supra-annular biological heart valve.用于植入超环生物心脏瓣膜的外翻与非外翻缝合技术比较
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2443-2449. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.55.
2
The figure-of-8 aortic valve suturing technique optimizes the effective orifice area of a small aortic annulus-an ex vivo study.8 字主动脉瓣缝合技术优化了小主动脉瓣环的有效瓣口面积:一项离体研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 3;62(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac195.
3
Suture technique does not affect hemodynamic performance of the small supra-annular Trifecta bioprosthesis.缝合技术不影响小瓣环上Trifecta生物假体的血流动力学性能。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
4
Figure of eight suture technique in aortic valve replacement decreases prosthesis-patient mismatch.主动脉瓣置换术中的 8 字缝合技术可减少假体-患者不匹配。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 10;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02260-y.
5
Perpendicular and turbulent flow after aortic valve replacement: paravalvular or transvalvular leakage? - a case report.主动脉瓣置换术后的垂直和湍流:瓣周漏还是瓣叶漏?——一例病例报告
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jan 14;15(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-1050-4.
6
Stented bioprosthetic valve hemodynamics: is the supra-annular implant better than the intra-annular?带支架生物瓣膜的血流动力学:瓣环上植入是否优于瓣环内植入?
J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Mar;15(2):238-46.
7
Simple interrupted suturing increases valve performance after aortic valve replacement with a small supra-annular bioprosthesis.小瓣环上生物瓣置换术后单纯间断缝合可提高瓣膜性能。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
8
Matched Comparison of Two Different Biological Prostheses for Complete Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement.两种不同生物假体用于完全瓣环上主动脉瓣置换的匹配比较。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;63(6):459-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1548744. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
9
Continuous or interrupted pledgeted suture technique in stented bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a comparison of in-hospital outcomes.支架生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术中连续或间断带线缝合技术:院内结局比较。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Apr 4;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02754-3.
10
Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.小主动脉根部患者使用Trifecta和Freestyle生物瓣膜的早期血流动力学评估:一项前瞻性随机研究的初步结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 Sep;23(5):633-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Rationale and Design of the CREATE Trial: A Multicenter, Randomized Comparison of Continuation or Cessation of Single Antithrombotic Therapy at 1 Year After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.CREATE试验的原理与设计:经导管主动脉瓣置换术后1年单药抗栓治疗持续或停用的多中心随机对照研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr;14(7):e039350. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039350. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
German Heart Surgery Report 2017: The Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.《2017年德国心脏手术报告:德国胸心血管外科学会年度更新登记册》
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;66(8):608-621. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676131. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
2
Supra-annular versus intra-annular prostheses in aortic valve replacement: impact on haemodynamics and clinical outcomes.主动脉瓣置换术中瓣环上与瓣环内人工瓣膜:对血流动力学和临床结局的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):58-64. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy190.
3
Opening/closing pattern of Trifecta and Freestyle valves versus native aortic valve: Are stentless valves more physiologic than a stented valve?
Trifecta和Freestyle瓣膜与天然主动脉瓣的开闭模式:无支架瓣膜比有支架瓣膜更符合生理吗?
J Card Surg. 2017 Nov;32(11):680-685. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13231. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
4
Every millimeter counts.每毫米都很关键。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct;152(4):1028-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.035. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
5
Early haemodynamic performance of a latest generation supra-annular aortic bioprosthesis: experience from a large single-centre series.最新一代超环主动脉生物瓣的早期血流动力学性能:来自大型单中心系列研究的经验
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jun;49(6):1691-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv411. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
6
Comparison of Hemodynamics After Aortic Root Replacement Using Valve-Sparing or Bioprosthetic Valved Conduit.使用保留瓣膜或生物人工带瓣管道进行主动脉根部置换术后的血流动力学比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.109. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
Does the type of suture technique affect the fluid-dynamic performance of bioprostheses implanted in small aortic roots? Results from an in vitro study.缝合技术的类型是否会影响植入小主动脉根部的生物假体的流体动力学性能?一项体外研究的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;149(3):912-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.096. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
8
Diagnosis and management of valvular aortic stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄的诊断与管理
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2014 Oct 19;8(Suppl 1):15-24. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S15716. eCollection 2014.
9
Suture technique does not affect hemodynamic performance of the small supra-annular Trifecta bioprosthesis.缝合技术不影响小瓣环上Trifecta生物假体的血流动力学性能。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
10
The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?新型 St Jude Trifecta 与 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna 和 Magna Ease 主动脉生物瓣比较:是否具有血液动力学优势?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 May;147(5):1553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.045. Epub 2013 Jul 16.