Phillips Joseph D, Porter Eleah D, Beaulieu-Jones Brendin R, Fay Kayla A, Hasson Rian M, Millington Timothy M, Finley David J
Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon NH, USA.
The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jun;12(6):3110-3124. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-180.
Studies have demonstrated that chemoprophylaxis following anatomic lung resection can reduce post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). However, it is unclear if non-anatomic wedge resection warrants prophylaxis, as previously published rates vary widely. The primary goal of this study was to assess an institutional rate of POAF following anatomic resections with implementation of a novel amiodarone administration regimen compared to wedge resections without prophylaxis.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database and compared anatomic and wedge lung resection patients from 1/2015 to 4/2018. During the study period, a previously unpublished amiodarone order set consisting of a 300 mg IV bolus followed by 400 mg tablets TID ×3 days was administered to anatomic resection patients ≥65 who met criteria. Wedge resection patients were not intended to receive amiodarone prophylaxis. The primary outcome was POAF incidence. Risk factors for developing POAF were assessed.
A total of 537 patients met inclusion where 56% underwent anatomic resection and 44% wedge resection. Overall, 5.4% of patients experienced POAF. There was a significant reduction in post-anatomic resection POAF as compared to historic rates without prophylaxis (9.3% 20.3%, P<0.001). A single wedge resection patient (0.4%) developed POAF. On multivariable analysis, the only independent POAF risk factor was age ≥65 (OR: 5.41, 95% CI: 1.47-19.85).
Administration of our novel amiodarone order set reduces POAF after anatomic resection; however, POAF following wedge resection is too rare to warrant chemoprophylaxis.
研究表明,解剖性肺切除术后进行化学预防可降低术后房颤(POAF)的发生率。然而,对于非解剖性楔形切除是否需要预防尚不清楚,因为先前公布的发生率差异很大。本研究的主要目的是评估在实施一种新型胺碘酮给药方案的情况下,解剖性切除术后的机构POAF发生率,并与未进行预防的楔形切除术进行比较。
我们对一个前瞻性维护的数据库进行了回顾性队列研究,比较了2015年1月至2018年4月期间的解剖性和楔形肺切除患者。在研究期间,符合标准的≥65岁的解剖性切除患者接受了一种先前未发表的胺碘酮医嘱套餐,包括静脉推注300mg,随后口服400mg片剂,每日三次,共3天。楔形切除患者未接受胺碘酮预防。主要结局是POAF的发生率。评估了发生POAF的危险因素。
共有537例患者符合纳入标准,其中56%接受了解剖性切除,44%接受了楔形切除。总体而言,5.4%的患者发生了POAF。与未进行预防的历史发生率相比,解剖性切除术后的POAF发生率显著降低(9.3%对20.3%,P<0.001)。一名楔形切除患者(0.4%)发生了POAF。在多变量分析中,唯一独立的POAF危险因素是年龄≥65岁(OR:5.41,95%CI:1.47-19.85)。
使用我们新型的胺碘酮医嘱套餐可降低解剖性切除术后的POAF发生率;然而,楔形切除术后的POAF非常罕见,无需进行化学预防。