Suppr超能文献

腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术中的镇痛效果:荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。

The analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block in caesarean delivery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, MM(DU), Mullana, Ambala, India.

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2020 Dec;34(6):814-824. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02822-7. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has recently gained popularity for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery (CD) as it provides both visceral and somato-sensory blockade of the abdomen. Aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the analgesic potential of QLB after CD.

METHODS

Electronic database from inception to December 2019 was searched systematically for randomized-controlled trials comparing QLB with injection of inactive solution in women undergoing CD. Primary outcome was consumption of morphine at 24 h. Morphine consumption at 48 h, dynamic and static pain scores at various time intervals were the secondary outcomes studied.

RESULTS

Seven trials met the inclusion criteria. Morphine consumption was reduced significantly with QLB in comparison to sham or no block at 24 h (mean difference [MD] - 9.84 mg; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 18.16, - 0.50; p = 0.04; I = zero). Adequate "information size" for above outcome was confirmed with trial sequential analysis, ruling out any possibility of a false-positive result. QLB significantly reduced pain scores at rest (MD - 1.13; 95% CI - 1.75, - 0.56; p = 0.00) and on movement (MD - 1.48; 95% CI - 2.5, - 0.46; p = 0.01) at 6 h. However, statistically significant difference in pain scores persisted only for dynamic pain at 24 h (MD - 0.55; 95% CI - 1.04, - 0.06; p = 0.03). QLB does not provide any additional analgesic benefit to the parturient receiving intrathecal morphine.

CONCLUSION

QLB significantly reduces opioid requirements in CD and may have analgesic effects lasting 24 h.

摘要

目的

腰方肌阻滞(QLB)最近在剖宫产(CD)后镇痛中变得流行,因为它可以提供腹部内脏和躯体感觉阻滞。本荟萃分析的目的是评估 QLB 在 CD 后的镇痛潜力。

方法

系统地从数据库建立到 2019 年 12 月搜索比较 QLB 与在接受 CD 的女性中注射无效溶液的随机对照试验。主要结局是 24 小时内吗啡的消耗量。次要结局是研究 48 小时时的吗啡消耗量、不同时间间隔的动态和静态疼痛评分。

结果

7 项试验符合纳入标准。与假阻滞或无阻滞相比,QLB 可显著减少 24 小时吗啡的消耗量(均数差 [MD] -9.84mg;95%置信区间 [CI] -18.16,-0.50;p=0.04;I=0)。通过试验序贯分析确认了上述结果的“信息大小”足够,排除了任何假阳性结果的可能性。QLB 可显著降低静息时(MD -1.13;95%CI -1.75,-0.56;p=0.00)和运动时(MD -1.48;95%CI -2.5,-0.46;p=0.01)的疼痛评分,在 6 小时时。然而,只有在 24 小时时动态疼痛评分上,差异才具有统计学意义(MD -0.55;95%CI -1.04,-0.06;p=0.03)。QLB 不能为接受鞘内吗啡的产妇提供任何额外的镇痛益处。

结论

QLB 可显著减少 CD 中的阿片类药物需求,并可能具有持续 24 小时的镇痛作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验